Interpretation of GAFTA 78, clauses 11.3 and 17 – arbitration: Public Company Rise v Nibulon SA [2015] EWHC 684 (Comm)
Interpretation of GAFTA 78, clauses 11.3 and 17 – arbitration: Public Company Rise v Nibulon SA [2015] EWHC 684 (Comm)
Interpretation of GAFTA 78, clauses 11.3 and 17 – arbitrationPublic Company Rise: background The dispute between the sellers (claimants) and the buyers (defendants) arose out of three contracts for the sale of 158,000 mt in total of Ukrainian feed corn. The contracts incorporated Incoterms 2000. The sellers were to obtain export licences and each contract incorporated the provision of GAFTA 78.
5-7
Reed, Daniel Simon
9735b2e0-379a-4f63-848a-695ba170f8fc
1 June 2015
Reed, Daniel Simon
9735b2e0-379a-4f63-848a-695ba170f8fc
Reed, Daniel Simon
(2015)
Interpretation of GAFTA 78, clauses 11.3 and 17 – arbitration: Public Company Rise v Nibulon SA [2015] EWHC 684 (Comm).
Shipping & Trade Law, 15 (5), .
Abstract
Interpretation of GAFTA 78, clauses 11.3 and 17 – arbitrationPublic Company Rise: background The dispute between the sellers (claimants) and the buyers (defendants) arose out of three contracts for the sale of 158,000 mt in total of Ukrainian feed corn. The contracts incorporated Incoterms 2000. The sellers were to obtain export licences and each contract incorporated the provision of GAFTA 78.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 June 2015
Organisations:
Southampton Law School
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 378702
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/378702
PURE UUID: eb302952-2b36-4f71-af6f-2ad7462982e9
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Jul 2015 10:05
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 06:59
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Daniel Simon Reed
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics