The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Universal health care and equity: evidence of maternal health based on an analysis of demographic and household survey data

Universal health care and equity: evidence of maternal health based on an analysis of demographic and household survey data
Universal health care and equity: evidence of maternal health based on an analysis of demographic and household survey data
INTRODUCTION:
The drive toward universal health coverage (UHC) is central to the post 2015 agenda, and is incorporated as a target in the new Sustainable Development Goals. However, it is recognised that an equity dimension needs to be included when progress to this goal is monitored. WHO have developed a monitoring framework which proposes a target of 80 % coverage for all populations regardless of income and place of residence by 2030, and this paper examines the feasibility of this target in relation to antenatal care and skilled care at delivery.

METHODOLOGY:
We analyse the coverage gap between the poorest and richest groups within the population for antenatal care and presence of a skilled attendant at birth for countries grouped by overall coverage of each maternal health service. Average annual rates of improvement needed for each grouping (disaggregated by wealth quintile and urban/rural residence) to reach the goal are also calculated, alongside rates of progress over the past decades for comparative purposes.

FINDINGS:
Marked inequities are seen in all groups except in countries where overall coverage is high. As the monitoring framework has an absolute target countries with currently very low coverage are required to make rapid and sustained progress, in particular for the poorest and those living in rural areas. The rate of past progress will need to be accelerated markedly in most countries if the target is to be achieved, although several countries have demonstrated the rate of progress required is feasible both for the population as a whole and for the poorest.

CONCLUSIONS:
For countries with currently low coverage the target of 80 % essential coverage for all populations will be challenging. Lessons should be drawn from countries who have achieved rapid and equitable progress in the past.
maternal health, universal health coverage, sustainable development goals, monitoring, inequity
1475-9276
Neal, Sarah
2b63ebf7-1cf9-423d-80a2-bd99a759f784
Channon, Andrew A.R.
5a60607c-6861-4960-a81d-504169d5880c
Carter, Sarah
a5111bba-b67c-47ec-b74a-b0bcef477fe6
Falkingham, Jane
8df36615-1547-4a6d-ad55-aa9496e85519
Neal, Sarah
2b63ebf7-1cf9-423d-80a2-bd99a759f784
Channon, Andrew A.R.
5a60607c-6861-4960-a81d-504169d5880c
Carter, Sarah
a5111bba-b67c-47ec-b74a-b0bcef477fe6
Falkingham, Jane
8df36615-1547-4a6d-ad55-aa9496e85519

Neal, Sarah, Channon, Andrew A.R., Carter, Sarah and Falkingham, Jane (2015) Universal health care and equity: evidence of maternal health based on an analysis of demographic and household survey data. International Journal for Equity in Health, 14 (1), [56]. (doi:10.1186/s12939-015-0184-9). (PMID:26076751)

Record type: Article

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:
The drive toward universal health coverage (UHC) is central to the post 2015 agenda, and is incorporated as a target in the new Sustainable Development Goals. However, it is recognised that an equity dimension needs to be included when progress to this goal is monitored. WHO have developed a monitoring framework which proposes a target of 80 % coverage for all populations regardless of income and place of residence by 2030, and this paper examines the feasibility of this target in relation to antenatal care and skilled care at delivery.

METHODOLOGY:
We analyse the coverage gap between the poorest and richest groups within the population for antenatal care and presence of a skilled attendant at birth for countries grouped by overall coverage of each maternal health service. Average annual rates of improvement needed for each grouping (disaggregated by wealth quintile and urban/rural residence) to reach the goal are also calculated, alongside rates of progress over the past decades for comparative purposes.

FINDINGS:
Marked inequities are seen in all groups except in countries where overall coverage is high. As the monitoring framework has an absolute target countries with currently very low coverage are required to make rapid and sustained progress, in particular for the poorest and those living in rural areas. The rate of past progress will need to be accelerated markedly in most countries if the target is to be achieved, although several countries have demonstrated the rate of progress required is feasible both for the population as a whole and for the poorest.

CONCLUSIONS:
For countries with currently low coverage the target of 80 % essential coverage for all populations will be challenging. Lessons should be drawn from countries who have achieved rapid and equitable progress in the past.

Text
__userfiles.soton.ac.uk_Users_slb1_mydesktop_Neal.pdf - Other
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 14 June 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 June 2015
Published date: 16 June 2015
Keywords: maternal health, universal health coverage, sustainable development goals, monitoring, inequity
Organisations: Social Statistics & Demography

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 378715
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/378715
ISSN: 1475-9276
PURE UUID: 78cebb82-bce9-4917-9b78-c79160844006
ORCID for Sarah Neal: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1812-7221
ORCID for Andrew A.R. Channon: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4855-0418
ORCID for Jane Falkingham: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7135-5875

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Jul 2015 13:07
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sarah Neal ORCID iD
Author: Sarah Carter
Author: Jane Falkingham ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×