The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

What do external consultants from private and not-for-profit companies offer healthcare commissioners? A qualitative study of knowledge exchange

What do external consultants from private and not-for-profit companies offer healthcare commissioners? A qualitative study of knowledge exchange
What do external consultants from private and not-for-profit companies offer healthcare commissioners? A qualitative study of knowledge exchange
Objectives: The use of external consultants from private and not-for-profit providers in the NHS is intended to improve the quality of commissioning. The aim of this study was to learn about the support offered to healthcare commissioners, how external consultants and their clients work together and the perceived impact on the quality of commissioning.
Setting: NHS commissioning organisations and private and not-for-profit providers
Design: mixed methods case study of eight cases
Data collection: 92 interviews with external consultants (n=36), their clients (n=47) and others (n=9). Observation of 25 training events and meetings. Documentation e.g. meeting minutes and reports.
Analysis: Constant comparison. Data were coded, summarised and analysed by the research team with a coding framework to facilitate cross case comparison.
Results: In the four contracts presented here, external providers offered technical solutions (e.g. software tools), outsourcing and expertise including project management, data interpretation and brokering relationships with experts. In assessing perceived impact on quality of commissioning, two contracts had limited value, one had short term benefits and one provided short and longer term benefits. Contracts with commissioners actively learning, embedding and applying new skills were more valued. Other elements of success were: (i) addressing clearly agreed problems of relevance to managerial and operational staff (ii) solutions co-produced at all organisational levels (iii) external consultants working directly with clients to interpret data outputs to inform locally contextualised commissioning strategies. Without explicit knowledge exchange strategies, outsourcing commissioning to external providers resulted in the NHS clients becoming dependent.
Conclusion
NHS commissioning will be disadvantaged longer term if commissioners both fail to learn in the short term from the knowledge of external providers and in the longer term lose local skills. Knowledge exchange mechanisms are a vital component of commissioning and should be embedded in external provider contracts.
2044-6055
Wye, L.
03d65ace-a72e-40f9-973c-72ea9b8bbb79
Brangan, E.
04b89eb1-9d52-44d0-915f-4786996f600c
Cameron, A.
3a26740f-106b-4765-aed6-a10b51d6b5d1
Gabbay, J.
d779b76c-febe-461b-b3bb-e110163f114a
Klein, J.H.
639e04f0-059a-4566-9361-a4edda0dba7d
Anthwal, R.
42734079-5634-40f0-a107-3f70cd6ba392
Pope, C.
21ae1290-0838-4245-adcf-6f901a0d4607
Wye, L.
03d65ace-a72e-40f9-973c-72ea9b8bbb79
Brangan, E.
04b89eb1-9d52-44d0-915f-4786996f600c
Cameron, A.
3a26740f-106b-4765-aed6-a10b51d6b5d1
Gabbay, J.
d779b76c-febe-461b-b3bb-e110163f114a
Klein, J.H.
639e04f0-059a-4566-9361-a4edda0dba7d
Anthwal, R.
42734079-5634-40f0-a107-3f70cd6ba392
Pope, C.
21ae1290-0838-4245-adcf-6f901a0d4607

Wye, L., Brangan, E., Cameron, A., Gabbay, J., Klein, J.H., Anthwal, R. and Pope, C. (2015) What do external consultants from private and not-for-profit companies offer healthcare commissioners? A qualitative study of knowledge exchange. BMJ Open, 5 (2), [e006558]. (doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006558).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: The use of external consultants from private and not-for-profit providers in the NHS is intended to improve the quality of commissioning. The aim of this study was to learn about the support offered to healthcare commissioners, how external consultants and their clients work together and the perceived impact on the quality of commissioning.
Setting: NHS commissioning organisations and private and not-for-profit providers
Design: mixed methods case study of eight cases
Data collection: 92 interviews with external consultants (n=36), their clients (n=47) and others (n=9). Observation of 25 training events and meetings. Documentation e.g. meeting minutes and reports.
Analysis: Constant comparison. Data were coded, summarised and analysed by the research team with a coding framework to facilitate cross case comparison.
Results: In the four contracts presented here, external providers offered technical solutions (e.g. software tools), outsourcing and expertise including project management, data interpretation and brokering relationships with experts. In assessing perceived impact on quality of commissioning, two contracts had limited value, one had short term benefits and one provided short and longer term benefits. Contracts with commissioners actively learning, embedding and applying new skills were more valued. Other elements of success were: (i) addressing clearly agreed problems of relevance to managerial and operational staff (ii) solutions co-produced at all organisational levels (iii) external consultants working directly with clients to interpret data outputs to inform locally contextualised commissioning strategies. Without explicit knowledge exchange strategies, outsourcing commissioning to external providers resulted in the NHS clients becoming dependent.
Conclusion
NHS commissioning will be disadvantaged longer term if commissioners both fail to learn in the short term from the knowledge of external providers and in the longer term lose local skills. Knowledge exchange mechanisms are a vital component of commissioning and should be embedded in external provider contracts.

Text
__soton.ac.uk_ude_personalfiles_users_cjp_mydesktop_pre pub copies for eprints_Wye et al BMJ Open PREPUB Oct 2014 submission.docx - Other
Download (63kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 7 January 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 25 February 2015
Published date: 25 February 2015
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 378880
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/378880
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: 9cb74680-8acb-4e66-959f-79cc6d57ca8a
ORCID for J.H. Klein: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5495-8738
ORCID for C. Pope: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8935-6702

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Jul 2015 13:07
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: L. Wye
Author: E. Brangan
Author: A. Cameron
Author: J. Gabbay
Author: J.H. Klein ORCID iD
Author: R. Anthwal
Author: C. Pope ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×