The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Contested professional role boundaries in health care: a systematic review of the literature

Contested professional role boundaries in health care: a systematic review of the literature
Contested professional role boundaries in health care: a systematic review of the literature
Across the Western world, demographic changes have led to healthcare policy trends in the direction of role flexibility, challenging established role boundaries and professional hierarchies. Population ageing is known to be associated with a rise in prevalence of chronic illnesses which, coupled with a reducing workforce, now places much greater demands on healthcare provision. Role flexibility within the health professions has been identified as one of the key innovative practice developments which may mitigate the effects of these demographic changes and help to ensure a sustainable health provision into the future. However, it is clear that policy drives to encourage and enable greater role flexibility among the health professions may also lead to professional resistance and inter-professional role boundary disputes. In the foot and ankle arena, this has been evident in areas such as podiatric surgery, podiatrist prescribing and extended practice in diabetes care, but it is far from unique to podiatry.

Methods
A systematic review of the literature identifying examples of disputed role boundaries in health professions was undertaken, utilising the STARLITE framework and adopting a focus on the specific characteristics and outcomes of boundary disputes. Synthesis of the data was undertaken via template analysis, employing a thematic organisation and structure.

Results
The review highlights the range of role boundary disputes across the health professions, and a commonality of events preceding each dispute. It was notable that relatively few disputes were resolved through recourse to legal or regulatory mandates.

Conclusions
Whilst there are a number of different strategies underpinning boundary disputes, some common characteristics can be identified and related to existing theory. Importantly, horizontal substitution invokes more overt role boundary disputes than other forms, with less resolution, and with clear implications for professions working within the foot and ankle arena.
contested boundaries, professional boundaries, inter-professional boundaries
1757-1146
2
King, Olivia
fb0a80ff-08e9-49b6-84d8-8f6f1175f3cf
Nancarrow, Susan A.
b65c3631-5d59-4d4a-8aee-2f570a4b3b20
Borthwick, Alan M.
b4d1fa51-182d-4296-b5fe-5b7c32ef6f9d
Grace, Sandra
3191c250-f71d-4cff-970d-cdb3b85ff7dd
King, Olivia
fb0a80ff-08e9-49b6-84d8-8f6f1175f3cf
Nancarrow, Susan A.
b65c3631-5d59-4d4a-8aee-2f570a4b3b20
Borthwick, Alan M.
b4d1fa51-182d-4296-b5fe-5b7c32ef6f9d
Grace, Sandra
3191c250-f71d-4cff-970d-cdb3b85ff7dd

King, Olivia, Nancarrow, Susan A., Borthwick, Alan M. and Grace, Sandra (2015) Contested professional role boundaries in health care: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 8 (1), 2. (doi:10.1186/s13047-015-0061-1).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Across the Western world, demographic changes have led to healthcare policy trends in the direction of role flexibility, challenging established role boundaries and professional hierarchies. Population ageing is known to be associated with a rise in prevalence of chronic illnesses which, coupled with a reducing workforce, now places much greater demands on healthcare provision. Role flexibility within the health professions has been identified as one of the key innovative practice developments which may mitigate the effects of these demographic changes and help to ensure a sustainable health provision into the future. However, it is clear that policy drives to encourage and enable greater role flexibility among the health professions may also lead to professional resistance and inter-professional role boundary disputes. In the foot and ankle arena, this has been evident in areas such as podiatric surgery, podiatrist prescribing and extended practice in diabetes care, but it is far from unique to podiatry.

Methods
A systematic review of the literature identifying examples of disputed role boundaries in health professions was undertaken, utilising the STARLITE framework and adopting a focus on the specific characteristics and outcomes of boundary disputes. Synthesis of the data was undertaken via template analysis, employing a thematic organisation and structure.

Results
The review highlights the range of role boundary disputes across the health professions, and a commonality of events preceding each dispute. It was notable that relatively few disputes were resolved through recourse to legal or regulatory mandates.

Conclusions
Whilst there are a number of different strategies underpinning boundary disputes, some common characteristics can be identified and related to existing theory. Importantly, horizontal substitution invokes more overt role boundary disputes than other forms, with less resolution, and with clear implications for professions working within the foot and ankle arena.

Text
ABContested professional role boundaries.pdf - Other
Download (679kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 January 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 February 2015
Published date: 5 February 2015
Keywords: contested boundaries, professional boundaries, inter-professional boundaries
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 378908
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/378908
ISSN: 1757-1146
PURE UUID: d7be2dca-34ff-4bbf-9366-796c23a4e552

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Jul 2015 12:54
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 20:30

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Olivia King
Author: Susan A. Nancarrow
Author: Alan M. Borthwick
Author: Sandra Grace

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×