The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Appendix V: Pollen Analysis

Appendix V: Pollen Analysis
Appendix V: Pollen Analysis
This project, commissioned by English Heritage (EH), concerned the application of geophysical and geotechnical/seabed sampling methodologies to marine aggregate deposits that have been demonstrated to contain potential preDevensian or Devensian artefactual material.
Artefactual material, including hand axes, flakes, cores and faunal remains, were recovered from dredging licence Area 240 (licensed to Hanson Aggregates Marine Ltd.) in 2008, situated approximately 11km off the coast of Great Yarmouth. The findings show that significant archaeological material can be present in deposits that are being targeted for marine aggregate extraction. The place where the finds were dredged is relatively discrete, and the provenance of the artefacts is secure. The area where the hand axes were recovered is currently subject to a rectangular exclusion zone based on dredger trackplots, implemented voluntarily by Hanson Aggregates Marine Ltd in accordance with the BMAPA/EH Protocol.
The principal aim of the project is to improve the future management of the potential effects of aggregate dredging on the marine historic environment by developing techniques to evaluating the source of prehistoric artefactual material discovered in the East Coast region. This report presents the findings of Stage 1: review of existing data and discusses the reinterpretation of geophysical and geotechnical data acquired on behalf of HAML for the assessment of aggregate reserves.
The geophysics data reviewed included multi-beam bathymetric data and sub-bottom profiler (boomer source) data acquired by Andrews Surveys Ltd (now Gardline Surveys Ltd) during June and July 2005. The geotechnical data included 158 vibrocore logs and photographs acquired between 1999 and 2007.
The review of the geophysical and geotechnical indicate a complex history of deposition and erosion within Area 240. This history is further complicated by dredging operations conducted over the last 20 years. Eight sediment units were identified in the data, dating from the Late Pliocene/Early Pleistocene (Unit 1) to marine deposits associated with the last transgression in the Holocene (Unit 8). The area is dominated by two channel features, one possibly dating to the Late Anglian (c. 480,000BP), the other a shallow meandering channel infilled with peats, possible deposited as late as the Mesolithic (c. 10,000 – 7,500 BP).
Within the area where the artefacts were dredged, three particular sediment units were identified sub-cropping the surficial sediment unit. Based on the artefact appearance and the initial dating of faunal material, the artefacts may be associated with particular units (Units 2, 4 and 6). The two channels lie to the north of this area, indicating that the artefacts, if associated with the channel, are associated with the channel edge rather than immediately adjacent to the channels.
36-45
Wessex Archaeology
Grant, Michael J.
56dae074-d54a-4da8-858a-2bf364a5a550
Russell, J.
Tizzard, L.
DeLoecker, D.
Grant, Michael J.
56dae074-d54a-4da8-858a-2bf364a5a550
Russell, J.
Tizzard, L.
DeLoecker, D.

Grant, Michael J. (2011) Appendix V: Pollen Analysis. In, Russell, J., Tizzard, L. and DeLoecker, D. (eds.) Seabed Prehistory: Site Evaluation Techniques (Area 240). Synthesis: Appendices. Salisbury, GB. Wessex Archaeology, pp. 36-45. (doi:10.5284/1008287).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

This project, commissioned by English Heritage (EH), concerned the application of geophysical and geotechnical/seabed sampling methodologies to marine aggregate deposits that have been demonstrated to contain potential preDevensian or Devensian artefactual material.
Artefactual material, including hand axes, flakes, cores and faunal remains, were recovered from dredging licence Area 240 (licensed to Hanson Aggregates Marine Ltd.) in 2008, situated approximately 11km off the coast of Great Yarmouth. The findings show that significant archaeological material can be present in deposits that are being targeted for marine aggregate extraction. The place where the finds were dredged is relatively discrete, and the provenance of the artefacts is secure. The area where the hand axes were recovered is currently subject to a rectangular exclusion zone based on dredger trackplots, implemented voluntarily by Hanson Aggregates Marine Ltd in accordance with the BMAPA/EH Protocol.
The principal aim of the project is to improve the future management of the potential effects of aggregate dredging on the marine historic environment by developing techniques to evaluating the source of prehistoric artefactual material discovered in the East Coast region. This report presents the findings of Stage 1: review of existing data and discusses the reinterpretation of geophysical and geotechnical data acquired on behalf of HAML for the assessment of aggregate reserves.
The geophysics data reviewed included multi-beam bathymetric data and sub-bottom profiler (boomer source) data acquired by Andrews Surveys Ltd (now Gardline Surveys Ltd) during June and July 2005. The geotechnical data included 158 vibrocore logs and photographs acquired between 1999 and 2007.
The review of the geophysical and geotechnical indicate a complex history of deposition and erosion within Area 240. This history is further complicated by dredging operations conducted over the last 20 years. Eight sediment units were identified in the data, dating from the Late Pliocene/Early Pleistocene (Unit 1) to marine deposits associated with the last transgression in the Holocene (Unit 8). The area is dominated by two channel features, one possibly dating to the Late Anglian (c. 480,000BP), the other a shallow meandering channel infilled with peats, possible deposited as late as the Mesolithic (c. 10,000 – 7,500 BP).
Within the area where the artefacts were dredged, three particular sediment units were identified sub-cropping the surficial sediment unit. Based on the artefact appearance and the initial dating of faunal material, the artefacts may be associated with particular units (Units 2, 4 and 6). The two channels lie to the north of this area, indicating that the artefacts, if associated with the channel, are associated with the channel edge rather than immediately adjacent to the channels.

Text
Area240.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (9MB)

More information

Published date: March 2011
Organisations: Geology & Geophysics, Archaeology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 378939
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/378939
PURE UUID: 8766f274-774c-4e39-b008-78bb30648fb2
ORCID for Michael J. Grant: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-6913

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Jul 2015 10:26
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:49

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Editor: J. Russell
Editor: L. Tizzard
Editor: D. DeLoecker

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×