The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Exploring the role of practical nursing wisdom in the care of patients with urinary problems at the end of life: a qualitative interview study

Exploring the role of practical nursing wisdom in the care of patients with urinary problems at the end of life: a qualitative interview study
Exploring the role of practical nursing wisdom in the care of patients with urinary problems at the end of life: a qualitative interview study
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study examined how nurses understand urinary problems at the end of life, and identified sources of evidence upon which they base their practice through semi-structured qualitative interviews. The aim was to decide whether research or interventions (such as formulation of best practice guidelines) could improve continence care at the end of life.

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence in nursing literature to indicate how nurses should manage urinary problems at the end of life. Evidence is particularly lacking regarding the insertion of indwelling urinary catheters.
DESIGN: This was an applied qualitative interview study which used the 'guided interview' approach.

METHODS: Twelve participants who worked in two hospital wards and one hospice were interviewed about management of patients with urinary problems approaching the end of life. The transcribed interviews were organised using the qualitative analysis software qsr NVivo version 10 (QSR International, Melbourne, Australia). Constant comparison was used to analyse the interviews.

RESULTS: The patient and their family were a key concern of all interviewees. Participants focused on processes including: giving care, making decisions, managing uncertainty and assimilating knowledge. These processes are mediated by 'phronesis' or practical wisdom.

CONCLUSIONS: Within each of the processes (giving care, making decisions, managing uncertainty and assimilating knowledge), participants approached each patient as an individual, using experience, patient wishes, available resources, clinical knowledge and advice from colleagues to provide care. A generalised set of guidelines on managing urinary problems at the end of life would probably not be useful.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: There is uncertainty about what constitutes best practice in specific areas of continence care at the end of life such as indwelling urinary catheter insertion. A careful approach is needed to ensure that the intellectual and moral knowledge that constitutes practical wisdom is shared and developed throughout teams.
continence, end of life, palliative, phronesis, qualitative
0962-1067
Farrington, Naomi
47071599-9054-4fe3-9d9e-93bb1bfd73a3
Fader, Mandy
659b0223-ebb9-4717-9d6d-9ec7b7ad2971
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Sartain, Samantha
1a64411f-318d-4db8-a038-655cc21ab91b
Farrington, Naomi
47071599-9054-4fe3-9d9e-93bb1bfd73a3
Fader, Mandy
659b0223-ebb9-4717-9d6d-9ec7b7ad2971
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Sartain, Samantha
1a64411f-318d-4db8-a038-655cc21ab91b

Farrington, Naomi, Fader, Mandy, Richardson, Alison and Sartain, Samantha (2015) Exploring the role of practical nursing wisdom in the care of patients with urinary problems at the end of life: a qualitative interview study. Journal of Clinical Nursing. (doi:10.1111/jocn.12829). (PMID:25926132)

Record type: Article

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study examined how nurses understand urinary problems at the end of life, and identified sources of evidence upon which they base their practice through semi-structured qualitative interviews. The aim was to decide whether research or interventions (such as formulation of best practice guidelines) could improve continence care at the end of life.

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence in nursing literature to indicate how nurses should manage urinary problems at the end of life. Evidence is particularly lacking regarding the insertion of indwelling urinary catheters.
DESIGN: This was an applied qualitative interview study which used the 'guided interview' approach.

METHODS: Twelve participants who worked in two hospital wards and one hospice were interviewed about management of patients with urinary problems approaching the end of life. The transcribed interviews were organised using the qualitative analysis software qsr NVivo version 10 (QSR International, Melbourne, Australia). Constant comparison was used to analyse the interviews.

RESULTS: The patient and their family were a key concern of all interviewees. Participants focused on processes including: giving care, making decisions, managing uncertainty and assimilating knowledge. These processes are mediated by 'phronesis' or practical wisdom.

CONCLUSIONS: Within each of the processes (giving care, making decisions, managing uncertainty and assimilating knowledge), participants approached each patient as an individual, using experience, patient wishes, available resources, clinical knowledge and advice from colleagues to provide care. A generalised set of guidelines on managing urinary problems at the end of life would probably not be useful.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: There is uncertainty about what constitutes best practice in specific areas of continence care at the end of life such as indwelling urinary catheter insertion. A careful approach is needed to ensure that the intellectual and moral knowledge that constitutes practical wisdom is shared and developed throughout teams.

Text
Farrington NursingWisdomFINAL post referee JCN.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (620kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: February 2015
Published date: 29 April 2015
Keywords: continence, end of life, palliative, phronesis, qualitative
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 379026
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/379026
ISSN: 0962-1067
PURE UUID: 9feb971f-a4c8-4551-a2de-451a3220253c
ORCID for Alison Richardson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3127-5755

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Jul 2015 16:06
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Naomi Farrington
Author: Mandy Fader
Author: Samantha Sartain

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×