The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Telephone versus face-to-face psychological therapy in an improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT) low-intensity service: an exploration of practitioners' and patients' experiences and its effectiveness

Telephone versus face-to-face psychological therapy in an improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT) low-intensity service: an exploration of practitioners' and patients' experiences and its effectiveness
Telephone versus face-to-face psychological therapy in an improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT) low-intensity service: an exploration of practitioners' and patients' experiences and its effectiveness
Over-the-Telephone (OTT) delivered therapies as an alternative method to face-to-face (F2F) therapy are becoming more prevalent in mental healthcare. This mixed methods project explored the differences between OTT and F2F low-intensity therapies within the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme. The views and experiences of IAPT service users and practitioners were collected using questionnaires and interviews. Service user psychometric outcome data were also collected. Established research documents a range of benefits of OTT use in psychotherapies but there are growing concerns over its potential effects on the therapeutic relationship. The results from this project raised five topics for discussion: (1) The effectiveness of OTT versus F2F therapy: Symptom score reductions were found across both modalities, but OTT users showed significant improvements which were not evident with F2F users. (2) The impact of OTT versus F2F on the therapeutic relationship: The therapeutic relationship is central to recovery in therapy and the absence of visual and non-verbal communication in OTT use contributed to a potential loss of ‘humanness’ in the experience of therapy. (3) Improving access to psychological therapies: OTT use was commended by patients and practitioners for removing barriers to access psychotherapies. (4) Patient attitudes to telephone use: Patients were initially sceptical about OTT because of their view that F2F is the ‘norm’ in psychotherapies. (5) Practitioner views on telemedicine use and the IAPT process: Practitioners expressed wariness towards OTT use, particularly in the context of the IAPT services’ quantitatively driven goals. Overall, these results support previous research in telemedicine. However, this project is unique in providing data on the patient and practitioner experiences of OTT and F2F in IAPT and contributes new understanding to an emerging research area. Possibilities for future research are outlined including ideas about how to develop and apply theoretical models which are relevant to the experience of therapy in an IAPT service.
Turner, J.
bc39d4a6-c2d4-405d-9b69-2079afceb86d
Turner, J.
bc39d4a6-c2d4-405d-9b69-2079afceb86d
Brown, Joanne
a4e89a80-d3b2-417e-8969-c103ddba409a
Carpenter, Diane
936c407f-ce4b-40db-9a7c-6a932e639237

Turner, J. (2015) Telephone versus face-to-face psychological therapy in an improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT) low-intensity service: an exploration of practitioners' and patients' experiences and its effectiveness. University of Southampton, Faculty of Health Sciences, Doctoral Thesis, 474pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Over-the-Telephone (OTT) delivered therapies as an alternative method to face-to-face (F2F) therapy are becoming more prevalent in mental healthcare. This mixed methods project explored the differences between OTT and F2F low-intensity therapies within the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme. The views and experiences of IAPT service users and practitioners were collected using questionnaires and interviews. Service user psychometric outcome data were also collected. Established research documents a range of benefits of OTT use in psychotherapies but there are growing concerns over its potential effects on the therapeutic relationship. The results from this project raised five topics for discussion: (1) The effectiveness of OTT versus F2F therapy: Symptom score reductions were found across both modalities, but OTT users showed significant improvements which were not evident with F2F users. (2) The impact of OTT versus F2F on the therapeutic relationship: The therapeutic relationship is central to recovery in therapy and the absence of visual and non-verbal communication in OTT use contributed to a potential loss of ‘humanness’ in the experience of therapy. (3) Improving access to psychological therapies: OTT use was commended by patients and practitioners for removing barriers to access psychotherapies. (4) Patient attitudes to telephone use: Patients were initially sceptical about OTT because of their view that F2F is the ‘norm’ in psychotherapies. (5) Practitioner views on telemedicine use and the IAPT process: Practitioners expressed wariness towards OTT use, particularly in the context of the IAPT services’ quantitatively driven goals. Overall, these results support previous research in telemedicine. However, this project is unique in providing data on the patient and practitioner experiences of OTT and F2F in IAPT and contributes new understanding to an emerging research area. Possibilities for future research are outlined including ideas about how to develop and apply theoretical models which are relevant to the experience of therapy in an IAPT service.

Text
Final Thesis.pdf - Other
Download (5MB)

More information

Published date: July 2015
Organisations: University of Southampton, Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 379620
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/379620
PURE UUID: 85465dca-4b19-450c-9315-82f4c9727438
ORCID for Joanne Brown: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3383-8809

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Aug 2015 13:26
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 20:45

Export record

Contributors

Author: J. Turner
Thesis advisor: Joanne Brown ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Diane Carpenter

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×