The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

“The damage I could do…”– Qualitative evaluation of a low-fidelity medication administration simulation that generates error as a learning experience for pre-registration nursing students

“The damage I could do…”– Qualitative evaluation of a low-fidelity medication administration simulation that generates error as a learning experience for pre-registration nursing students
“The damage I could do…”– Qualitative evaluation of a low-fidelity medication administration simulation that generates error as a learning experience for pre-registration nursing students
Background: In recent years, nurse education has emphasised the development of high cost, high-fidelity simulations because they are considered to provide a more realistic learning experience. Integral is the facility to commit and learn from error. Error may provide a mechanism to make low cost, low-fidelity simulations more psychologically realistic and salient. We developed a web based medication administration simulation which included all essential cognitive elements of medication administration task, but was “low-fidelity” in engineering terms of its portrayal of the physical world. The simulation incorporated conditions designed to generate high rates of medication administration error. The purpose of this study was to determine if the low cost low-fidelity simulation provided a salient, effective and psychologically realistic learning experience for pre-registration nursing students over the long term.

Methods: Individual qualitative interviews were conducted with 12 pre-registration nursing students, from one UK university, from a group of 49 students who had received the simulation as trial participants 2-years previously. The interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: Most participants were able to reflect on their experiences of the simulation in depth, and considered the simulation to be a valuable component to their learning. The simulation encouraged students to question their practice and highlighted their vulnerability to medication administration error. It reinforced both the importance of completing checking procedures and the potential consequences of making an error in practice. Most students believed the low- fidelity simulation provided a psychologically realistic representation of medication administration, which was underpinned by the negative emotional reactions to making an error, for example, guilt.

Conclusions: Low-fidelity web based simulations can provide a sufficiently realistic psychological representation of medication administration to produce a salient, effective learning experience over the long-term. Low-fidelity simulations can provide a low cost alternative to high-fidelity simulations. Making error in a simulation should be transformed from a useful but passive by-product into an active component of the simulation learning approach.
low-fidelity simulation, patient safety, drug administration error, qualitative research
1925-4040
11-19
Helyar, Sinead Marie
f975730d-d6fe-4de1-8f15-05e6ca2aaa97
Griffiths, Peter
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b
Norman, Ian J.
24dd7dd3-7af4-4bff-9f20-7bbaecd3421a
Helyar, Sinead Marie
f975730d-d6fe-4de1-8f15-05e6ca2aaa97
Griffiths, Peter
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b
Norman, Ian J.
24dd7dd3-7af4-4bff-9f20-7bbaecd3421a

Helyar, Sinead Marie, Griffiths, Peter and Norman, Ian J. (2013) “The damage I could do…”– Qualitative evaluation of a low-fidelity medication administration simulation that generates error as a learning experience for pre-registration nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 4 (2), 11-19. (doi:10.5430/jnep.v4n2p11).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: In recent years, nurse education has emphasised the development of high cost, high-fidelity simulations because they are considered to provide a more realistic learning experience. Integral is the facility to commit and learn from error. Error may provide a mechanism to make low cost, low-fidelity simulations more psychologically realistic and salient. We developed a web based medication administration simulation which included all essential cognitive elements of medication administration task, but was “low-fidelity” in engineering terms of its portrayal of the physical world. The simulation incorporated conditions designed to generate high rates of medication administration error. The purpose of this study was to determine if the low cost low-fidelity simulation provided a salient, effective and psychologically realistic learning experience for pre-registration nursing students over the long term.

Methods: Individual qualitative interviews were conducted with 12 pre-registration nursing students, from one UK university, from a group of 49 students who had received the simulation as trial participants 2-years previously. The interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: Most participants were able to reflect on their experiences of the simulation in depth, and considered the simulation to be a valuable component to their learning. The simulation encouraged students to question their practice and highlighted their vulnerability to medication administration error. It reinforced both the importance of completing checking procedures and the potential consequences of making an error in practice. Most students believed the low- fidelity simulation provided a psychologically realistic representation of medication administration, which was underpinned by the negative emotional reactions to making an error, for example, guilt.

Conclusions: Low-fidelity web based simulations can provide a sufficiently realistic psychological representation of medication administration to produce a salient, effective learning experience over the long-term. Low-fidelity simulations can provide a low cost alternative to high-fidelity simulations. Making error in a simulation should be transformed from a useful but passive by-product into an active component of the simulation learning approach.

Text
The damage I could do. Qualitative evaluation of a low fidelity.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 6 May 2013
Published date: 10 September 2013
Keywords: low-fidelity simulation, patient safety, drug administration error, qualitative research
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 379869
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/379869
ISSN: 1925-4040
PURE UUID: 09e1731c-506e-40c4-b142-49f743d22792
ORCID for Peter Griffiths: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2439-2857

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Aug 2015 11:22
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sinead Marie Helyar
Author: Peter Griffiths ORCID iD
Author: Ian J. Norman

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×