The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Incorporation of charterparty terms by general words

Incorporation of charterparty terms by general words
Incorporation of charterparty terms by general words
[Preview]
The incorporation of charterparty terms by general words is a particular instance of contractual interpretation, principally of the contract into which the terms are to be incorporated. In Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank, Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony JSC, summarising the effect of earlier decisions, emphasised that

"... the exercise of construction is essentially one unitary exercise in which the court must consider the language used and ascertain what a reasonable person, that is a person who has all the background knowledge which would reasonably have been available to the parties in the situation in which they were at the time of the contract, would have understood the parties to have meant …."

Though, "[where] the parties have used unambiguous language, the court must apply it", Lord Clarke continue3:

"If there are two possible constructions, the court is entitled to prefer the construction which is consistent with business common sense and to reject the other."

Though one might perhaps doubt the utility, in particular situations, of general statements of this type, Lord Clarke’s preference has immediate application where there is genuine ambiguity, and only one interpretation which is consistent with business common sense. It seems reasonable to suppose that ambiguity includes the use of phrases the legal effect of which is uncertain. The real value of Rainy Sky, though, is to remind us that detailed traditional rules must always be judged against "the ultimate aim of interpreting a provision in a contract". To the extent that they do not, the technical rules should surely give way. In a similar vein, general statements in the Privy Council (this time in Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd) on the implication of terms into a contract, even if they might have little effect on the actual implication of terms into commercial contracts in particular situations, at least guard against treating "alternative [traditional] formulations of the question as if they had a life of their own". The detailed traditional rules are the servants, not the masters, of the general principle.
0021-9460
407-424
Todd, Paul
ccd4b3f3-16ae-474f-90ac-bba7d8bba9fc
Todd, Paul
ccd4b3f3-16ae-474f-90ac-bba7d8bba9fc

Todd, Paul (2014) Incorporation of charterparty terms by general words. Journal of Business Law, 5, 407-424.

Record type: Article

Abstract

[Preview]
The incorporation of charterparty terms by general words is a particular instance of contractual interpretation, principally of the contract into which the terms are to be incorporated. In Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank, Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony JSC, summarising the effect of earlier decisions, emphasised that

"... the exercise of construction is essentially one unitary exercise in which the court must consider the language used and ascertain what a reasonable person, that is a person who has all the background knowledge which would reasonably have been available to the parties in the situation in which they were at the time of the contract, would have understood the parties to have meant …."

Though, "[where] the parties have used unambiguous language, the court must apply it", Lord Clarke continue3:

"If there are two possible constructions, the court is entitled to prefer the construction which is consistent with business common sense and to reject the other."

Though one might perhaps doubt the utility, in particular situations, of general statements of this type, Lord Clarke’s preference has immediate application where there is genuine ambiguity, and only one interpretation which is consistent with business common sense. It seems reasonable to suppose that ambiguity includes the use of phrases the legal effect of which is uncertain. The real value of Rainy Sky, though, is to remind us that detailed traditional rules must always be judged against "the ultimate aim of interpreting a provision in a contract". To the extent that they do not, the technical rules should surely give way. In a similar vein, general statements in the Privy Council (this time in Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd) on the implication of terms into a contract, even if they might have little effect on the actual implication of terms into commercial contracts in particular situations, at least guard against treating "alternative [traditional] formulations of the question as if they had a life of their own". The detailed traditional rules are the servants, not the masters, of the general principle.

Text
Incorporation of charterparty terms by general words - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 2014
Published date: 2014
Organisations: Southampton Law School

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 380199
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/380199
ISSN: 0021-9460
PURE UUID: 88dec082-9b96-434d-af74-72d7b0e95e5a

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Sep 2015 14:20
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 20:56

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×