The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Hydrodynamic instabilities in gaseous detonations: a comparison of Euler, Navier-Stokes and large eddy simulation

Hydrodynamic instabilities in gaseous detonations: a comparison of Euler, Navier-Stokes and large eddy simulation
Hydrodynamic instabilities in gaseous detonations: a comparison of Euler, Navier-Stokes and large eddy simulation
A large-eddy simulation is conducted to investigate the transient structure of an unstable detonation wave in two dimensions and the evolution of intrinsic hydrodynamic instabilities. The dependency of the detonation structure on the grid resolution is investigated, and the structures obtained by large-eddy simulation are compared with the predictions from solving the Euler and Navier–Stokes equations directly. The results indicate that to predict irregular detonation structures in agreement with experimental observations the vorticity generation and dissipation in small scale structures should be taken into account. Thus, large-eddy simulation with high grid resolution is required. In a low grid resolution scenario, in which numerical diffusion dominates, the structures obtained by solving the Euler or Navier–Stokes equations and large-eddy simulation are qualitatively similar. When high grid resolution is employed, the detonation structures obtained by solving the Euler or Navier–Stokes equations directly are roughly similar yet equally in disagreement with the experimental results. For high grid resolution, only the large-eddy simulation predicts detonation substructures correctly, a fact that is attributed to the increased dissipation provided by the subgrid scale model. Specific to the investigated configuration, major differences are observed in the occurrence of unreacted gas pockets in the high-resolution Euler and Navier–Stokes computations, which appear to be fully combusted when large-eddy simulation is employed.
0748-4658
384-396
Mahmoudi, Y.
0ee490c6-5f9b-4fd0-8cc2-aceeed6d580e
Karimi, N.
8d08f0c3-9962-4046-9512-fa50745069c0
Deiterding, R.
ce02244b-6651-47e3-8325-2c0a0c9c6314
Emami, S.
1603f18b-4e84-41ca-a198-146fa0b111fb
Mahmoudi, Y.
0ee490c6-5f9b-4fd0-8cc2-aceeed6d580e
Karimi, N.
8d08f0c3-9962-4046-9512-fa50745069c0
Deiterding, R.
ce02244b-6651-47e3-8325-2c0a0c9c6314
Emami, S.
1603f18b-4e84-41ca-a198-146fa0b111fb

Mahmoudi, Y., Karimi, N., Deiterding, R. and Emami, S. (2014) Hydrodynamic instabilities in gaseous detonations: a comparison of Euler, Navier-Stokes and large eddy simulation. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 30 (2), 384-396. (doi:10.2514/1.B34986).

Record type: Article

Abstract

A large-eddy simulation is conducted to investigate the transient structure of an unstable detonation wave in two dimensions and the evolution of intrinsic hydrodynamic instabilities. The dependency of the detonation structure on the grid resolution is investigated, and the structures obtained by large-eddy simulation are compared with the predictions from solving the Euler and Navier–Stokes equations directly. The results indicate that to predict irregular detonation structures in agreement with experimental observations the vorticity generation and dissipation in small scale structures should be taken into account. Thus, large-eddy simulation with high grid resolution is required. In a low grid resolution scenario, in which numerical diffusion dominates, the structures obtained by solving the Euler or Navier–Stokes equations and large-eddy simulation are qualitatively similar. When high grid resolution is employed, the detonation structures obtained by solving the Euler or Navier–Stokes equations directly are roughly similar yet equally in disagreement with the experimental results. For high grid resolution, only the large-eddy simulation predicts detonation substructures correctly, a fact that is attributed to the increased dissipation provided by the subgrid scale model. Specific to the investigated configuration, major differences are observed in the occurrence of unreacted gas pockets in the high-resolution Euler and Navier–Stokes computations, which appear to be fully combusted when large-eddy simulation is employed.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 3 July 2013
Published date: March 2014
Organisations: Aerodynamics & Flight Mechanics Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 380649
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/380649
ISSN: 0748-4658
PURE UUID: 9e8de9d9-a841-4336-8bd1-314aff820ccf
ORCID for R. Deiterding: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4776-8183

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Sep 2015 15:52
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Y. Mahmoudi
Author: N. Karimi
Author: R. Deiterding ORCID iD
Author: S. Emami

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×