Patient safety policy in long-term care: a research protocol to assess executive walkrounds to improve management of early warning signs for patient safety
Patient safety policy in long-term care: a research protocol to assess executive walkrounds to improve management of early warning signs for patient safety
Background: at many hospitals and long-term care organizations (such as nursing homes), executive board members have a responsibility to manage patient safety. Executive WalkRounds offer an opportunity for boards to build a trusting relationship with professionals and seem useful as a leadership tool to pick up on soft signals, which are indirect signals or early warnings that something is wrong. Because the majority of the research on WalkRounds has been performed in hospitals, it is unknown how board members of long-term care organizations develop their patient safety policy. Also, it is not clear if these board members use soft signals as a leadership tool and, if so, how this influences their patient safety policies.
Objective: the objective of this study is to explore the added value and the feasibility of WalkRounds for patient safety management in long-term care. This study also aims to identify how executive board members of long-term care organizations manage patient safety and to describe the characteristics of boards.
Methods: an explorative before-and-after study was conducted between April 2012 and February 2014 in 13 long-term care organizations in the Netherlands. After implementing the intervention in 6 organizations, data from 72 WalkRounds were gathered by observation and a reporting form. Before and after the intervention period, data collection included interviews, questionnaires, and studying reports of the executive boards. A mixed-method analysis is performed using descriptive statistics, t tests, and content analysis.
Results: results are expected to be ready in mid 2014.
Conclusions: it is a challenge to keep track of ongoing development and implementation of patient safety management tools in long-term care. By performing this study in cooperation with the participating long-term care organizations, insight into the potential added value and the feasibility of this method will increase
1-9
Van Dusseldorp, L.
7786d344-b899-49e0-8202-592c37f564be
Hamers, H.
a916ae0a-54dd-4005-bba4-846b8ce8a791
van Achterberg, T.
1b413585-49b3-4989-a1b6-7fb4d4bac453
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
July 2014
Van Dusseldorp, L.
7786d344-b899-49e0-8202-592c37f564be
Hamers, H.
a916ae0a-54dd-4005-bba4-846b8ce8a791
van Achterberg, T.
1b413585-49b3-4989-a1b6-7fb4d4bac453
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Van Dusseldorp, L., Hamers, H., van Achterberg, T. and Schoonhoven, Lisette
(2014)
Patient safety policy in long-term care: a research protocol to assess executive walkrounds to improve management of early warning signs for patient safety.
Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) Research Protocols, 3 (3), .
(doi:10.2196/resprot.3256.).
(PMID:25048598)
Abstract
Background: at many hospitals and long-term care organizations (such as nursing homes), executive board members have a responsibility to manage patient safety. Executive WalkRounds offer an opportunity for boards to build a trusting relationship with professionals and seem useful as a leadership tool to pick up on soft signals, which are indirect signals or early warnings that something is wrong. Because the majority of the research on WalkRounds has been performed in hospitals, it is unknown how board members of long-term care organizations develop their patient safety policy. Also, it is not clear if these board members use soft signals as a leadership tool and, if so, how this influences their patient safety policies.
Objective: the objective of this study is to explore the added value and the feasibility of WalkRounds for patient safety management in long-term care. This study also aims to identify how executive board members of long-term care organizations manage patient safety and to describe the characteristics of boards.
Methods: an explorative before-and-after study was conducted between April 2012 and February 2014 in 13 long-term care organizations in the Netherlands. After implementing the intervention in 6 organizations, data from 72 WalkRounds were gathered by observation and a reporting form. Before and after the intervention period, data collection included interviews, questionnaires, and studying reports of the executive boards. A mixed-method analysis is performed using descriptive statistics, t tests, and content analysis.
Results: results are expected to be ready in mid 2014.
Conclusions: it is a challenge to keep track of ongoing development and implementation of patient safety management tools in long-term care. By performing this study in cooperation with the participating long-term care organizations, insight into the potential added value and the feasibility of this method will increase
Text
Van Dusseldorp et al Patient safety policy TLC walk rounds 2014.pdf
- Other
Text
Van Dusseldorp et al Patient safety policy TLC walk rounds 2014.pdf
- Other
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 9 June 2014
Published date: July 2014
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 380921
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/380921
ISSN: 1929-0748
PURE UUID: 63de1bb8-53d2-40a6-a70b-59e1e9b2bdee
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 Sep 2015 14:18
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:41
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
L. Van Dusseldorp
Author:
H. Hamers
Author:
T. van Achterberg
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics