Am I my brother’s keeper? A survey of ten healthcare professions in the Netherlands about experiences with impaired and incompetent colleagues
Am I my brother’s keeper? A survey of ten healthcare professions in the Netherlands about experiences with impaired and incompetent colleagues
Background: dealing with poor individual performance of healthcare professionals is essential in patient safety management. The objective of the current study was to explore potential differences regarding experiences with impaired and incompetent colleagues between a broad range of healthcare professions.
Methods: a survey of 10 legally regulated professions in the Netherlands on knowledge on dealing with impaired/incompetent colleagues, experiences with such colleagues, action taken upon an impaired and incompetent colleague and reasons for not taking action.
Results: we approached 4348 professionals, of whom 1238 responded (28.5%). One-third of the respondents (31.3%) had an experience with an impaired or incompetent colleague in the preceding 12?months, and 84% of these reported cases concerned incompetence. Even under the extreme assumption that all non-respondents had no such experiences, our results indicate that at least 9% of the total sample had dealt with an impaired or incompetent colleague in the previous 12?months. Two-thirds of the professionals (68.6%) who had an experience reported having acted upon it. Respondents significantly less often reported to have acted (49.6% vs 79.1%, p=0.000) when the colleague was working at a different organisation. The primary reason for not taking action was that impairment/incompetence could not be proven.
Conclusions: even using an extreme correction for our low response rate, at least 9% of healthcare professionals reported dealing with impaired or incompetent colleagues in the past year. Creating and clarifying reporting opportunities when confronted with an incompetent or impaired colleague should be a priority for professional organisations, policymakers and regulatory bodies
56-64
Weenink, J.W.
329bb789-d39a-4be0-9088-5d42f8728a75
Westert, G.P.
6b6d61d7-4d25-4aa7-bb7d-a6d8262cf086
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Wollersheim, H.
5e67270e-394d-41b8-b2c3-d0c7d14f00e7
Kool, R.B.
1dc76b98-77bc-488b-ab99-79add1bf03ce
January 2015
Weenink, J.W.
329bb789-d39a-4be0-9088-5d42f8728a75
Westert, G.P.
6b6d61d7-4d25-4aa7-bb7d-a6d8262cf086
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Wollersheim, H.
5e67270e-394d-41b8-b2c3-d0c7d14f00e7
Kool, R.B.
1dc76b98-77bc-488b-ab99-79add1bf03ce
Weenink, J.W., Westert, G.P., Schoonhoven, Lisette, Wollersheim, H. and Kool, R.B.
(2015)
Am I my brother’s keeper? A survey of ten healthcare professions in the Netherlands about experiences with impaired and incompetent colleagues.
BMJ Quality and Safety, 24, .
(doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003068).
Abstract
Background: dealing with poor individual performance of healthcare professionals is essential in patient safety management. The objective of the current study was to explore potential differences regarding experiences with impaired and incompetent colleagues between a broad range of healthcare professions.
Methods: a survey of 10 legally regulated professions in the Netherlands on knowledge on dealing with impaired/incompetent colleagues, experiences with such colleagues, action taken upon an impaired and incompetent colleague and reasons for not taking action.
Results: we approached 4348 professionals, of whom 1238 responded (28.5%). One-third of the respondents (31.3%) had an experience with an impaired or incompetent colleague in the preceding 12?months, and 84% of these reported cases concerned incompetence. Even under the extreme assumption that all non-respondents had no such experiences, our results indicate that at least 9% of the total sample had dealt with an impaired or incompetent colleague in the previous 12?months. Two-thirds of the professionals (68.6%) who had an experience reported having acted upon it. Respondents significantly less often reported to have acted (49.6% vs 79.1%, p=0.000) when the colleague was working at a different organisation. The primary reason for not taking action was that impairment/incompetence could not be proven.
Conclusions: even using an extreme correction for our low response rate, at least 9% of healthcare professionals reported dealing with impaired or incompetent colleagues in the past year. Creating and clarifying reporting opportunities when confronted with an incompetent or impaired colleague should be a priority for professional organisations, policymakers and regulatory bodies
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 20 October 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 November 2014
Published date: January 2015
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 380936
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/380936
ISSN: 2044-5415
PURE UUID: bfbbc376-c35f-422a-9af7-d1e92ad8d09e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Sep 2015 10:48
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:41
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
J.W. Weenink
Author:
G.P. Westert
Author:
H. Wollersheim
Author:
R.B. Kool
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics