Development of an online tailored self-management program for patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Development of an online tailored self-management program for patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Background: Every day rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients make many decisions about managing their disease. An online,computer-tailored, self-management program can support this decision making, but development of such a program requires the active participation of patients.
Objective: To develop an online, computer-tailored, self-management program integrated with the nursing care, as nurses have an important role in supporting self-management behavior.
Methods: The intervention mapping framework was used to develop the program. Development was a multistep process: (1) needs assessment; (2) developing program and change objectives in a matrix; (3) selecting theory-based intervention methods and practical application strategies; (4) producing program components; (5) planning and adoption, implementation, and sustainability; and (6) planning for evaluation.
Results: After conducting the needs assessment (step 1), nine health-related problems were identified: (1) balancing rest and activity, (2) setting boundaries, (3) asking for help and support, (4) use of medicines, (5) communicating with health professionals, (6) use of assistive devices, (7) performing physical exercises, (8) coping with worries, and (9) coping with RA. After defining performance and change objectives (step 2), we identified a number of methods which could be used to achieve them (step 3), such as provision of general information about health-related behavior, self-monitoring of behavior, persuasive communication,
modeling, and self-persuasion and tailoring. We described and operationalized these methods in texts, videos, exercises, and a medication intake schedule. The resulting program (step 4) consisted of an introduction module and nine modules dealing with health-related problems. The content of these modules is tailored to the user’s self-efficacy, and patients can use the online program as often as they want, working through a module or modules at their own speed. After implementation (step 5), the program will be evaluated in a two-center pilot trial involving 200 RA patients. Log-in data and qualitative interviews will used for a process evaluation.
Conclusions: The intervention mapping framework was used to guide development of an online computer-tailored self-management program via a process which could serve as a model for the development of other interventions. A pilot
randomized controlled trial (RCT) will provide insight into the important outcome measures in preparation for a larger RCT. The process evaluation will provide insight into how RA patients use the program and the attrition rate.
Zuidema, R.M.
26497637-84b0-42ae-ae4d-7138b331cf8e
Van Gaal, B.G.I.
066737a8-2dd7-41e4-bac8-badc4bca8771
van Dulmen, S.
d5d82261-42c3-46d5-bb89-1fd6ebe74a5c
Repping-Wuts, H.
9fd74a2c-2576-4e3c-aa33-aed59393178b
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
25 December 2015
Zuidema, R.M.
26497637-84b0-42ae-ae4d-7138b331cf8e
Van Gaal, B.G.I.
066737a8-2dd7-41e4-bac8-badc4bca8771
van Dulmen, S.
d5d82261-42c3-46d5-bb89-1fd6ebe74a5c
Repping-Wuts, H.
9fd74a2c-2576-4e3c-aa33-aed59393178b
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Zuidema, R.M., Van Gaal, B.G.I., van Dulmen, S., Repping-Wuts, H. and Schoonhoven, Lisette
(2015)
Development of an online tailored self-management program for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) Research Protocols.
(doi:10.2196/resprot.4571).
(PMID:26706653)
Abstract
Background: Every day rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients make many decisions about managing their disease. An online,computer-tailored, self-management program can support this decision making, but development of such a program requires the active participation of patients.
Objective: To develop an online, computer-tailored, self-management program integrated with the nursing care, as nurses have an important role in supporting self-management behavior.
Methods: The intervention mapping framework was used to develop the program. Development was a multistep process: (1) needs assessment; (2) developing program and change objectives in a matrix; (3) selecting theory-based intervention methods and practical application strategies; (4) producing program components; (5) planning and adoption, implementation, and sustainability; and (6) planning for evaluation.
Results: After conducting the needs assessment (step 1), nine health-related problems were identified: (1) balancing rest and activity, (2) setting boundaries, (3) asking for help and support, (4) use of medicines, (5) communicating with health professionals, (6) use of assistive devices, (7) performing physical exercises, (8) coping with worries, and (9) coping with RA. After defining performance and change objectives (step 2), we identified a number of methods which could be used to achieve them (step 3), such as provision of general information about health-related behavior, self-monitoring of behavior, persuasive communication,
modeling, and self-persuasion and tailoring. We described and operationalized these methods in texts, videos, exercises, and a medication intake schedule. The resulting program (step 4) consisted of an introduction module and nine modules dealing with health-related problems. The content of these modules is tailored to the user’s self-efficacy, and patients can use the online program as often as they want, working through a module or modules at their own speed. After implementation (step 5), the program will be evaluated in a two-center pilot trial involving 200 RA patients. Log-in data and qualitative interviews will used for a process evaluation.
Conclusions: The intervention mapping framework was used to guide development of an online computer-tailored self-management program via a process which could serve as a model for the development of other interventions. A pilot
randomized controlled trial (RCT) will provide insight into the important outcome measures in preparation for a larger RCT. The process evaluation will provide insight into how RA patients use the program and the attrition rate.
Text
Zuidema_JMIR2015.pdf
- Other
Available under License Other.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 24 July 2015
Published date: 25 December 2015
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 380951
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/380951
ISSN: 1929-0748
PURE UUID: eb0e7fb3-7a39-4b67-8b41-89c6028e2024
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Sep 2015 12:31
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:41
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
R.M. Zuidema
Author:
B.G.I. Van Gaal
Author:
S. van Dulmen
Author:
H. Repping-Wuts
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics