The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Non-attendance in musculoskeletal outpatients: the good, the bad and the ugly

Non-attendance in musculoskeletal outpatients: the good, the bad and the ugly
Non-attendance in musculoskeletal outpatients: the good, the bad and the ugly
Background: Non-attendance, i.e. the failure of patients to keep scheduled outpatient appointments, is well recognised. In England, of the 100.5 million outpatient appointments made between April 2013 and March 2014, 7.0 million (6.9%) were reportedly not attended. National non-attendance rates for physical therapy are unknown.

Non-attendance is claimed to increase health costs, lower productivity and disrupt patient flow, resulting in poor access to health care, longer waiting lists, delays in diagnosis and treatment, sub-optimal care and poor clinical outcomes. However, the empirical evidence for these claims is limited.

Understanding the causal chain to determine whether non-attendance is a voluntary behaviour, or whether there are underlying health system characteristics beyond the patient's control, is essential in designing interventions to reduce non-attendance rates.

Purpose: To identify why patients fail to complete physical therapy care episodes, using mixed methods, in multiple musculoskeletal outpatient settings.

Methods: An observational, longitudinal study was undertaken in one primary care musculoskeletal service, with 15 patients, purposively sampled and referred with low back pain. All physical therapy appointments were observed and audio-recorded. The clinicians and patients were interviewed about their physical therapy assessments and treatments, and a thematic analysis was undertaken, using a framework approach.

In addition, two postal surveys were undertaken, in physical therapy departments in a large teaching hospital and a small community hospital, using retrospective sampling. Patients who had attended the department at least once in the last 12 months and failed to complete their care were sent a 25-item checklist about the reasons for not finishing their physical therapy, with space for free text.

Results: In the observational study 8/15 patients did not complete their care. The interviews (in patients’ homes) revealed rich data about their decision to not attend, with some mismatches evident between patients’ and clinicians’ perceptions, in the multiple factors identified.

In the teaching hospital, 12/50 (24%) of the questionnaires were returned, with a mean of 1 factor cited for not attending (range 0–5). The top 3 reasons reported for non-attendance were: ‘my condition improved’ (17%); ‘no improvement with physiotherapy’ (17%); and ‘advised not to attend by another health care professional’ (17%).

There were 25 mailed and 5 telephone responses to the 77 questionnaires in the community hospital (39%), with a mean of 2.1 factors cited for not attending (range 1–6). The top 3 reasons for non-attendance were: ‘no improvement with physiotherapy’ (27%); ‘my condition improved’ (23%); and ‘other health issues took priority (23%).

Conclusion(s): The factors influencing non-attendance in three musculoskeletal outpatient services included voluntary behaviours by the patient, behaviours exhibited by other patients, service constraints, environmental factors and resolution of symptoms. A mixed methods approach to understand the reasons for non-attendance enabled depth of data through the qualitative interviews and breadth through the surveys. Systematic collection of non-attendance data is recommended using mixed methods, to identify the contributing factors from the patients’ perspective.

Implications: Identifying local reasons for non-attendance, directly from patients, could help in designing and implementing initiatives to reduce non-attendance in physical therapy services and enhance efficiency.
non-attendance, service delivery, musculoskeletal
0031-9406
e1289-e1290
Roberts, L.
0a937943-5246-4877-bd6b-4dcd172b5cd0
Garo-Falides, J.
fd3934bd-402b-4b94-8aa8-1c9ebb9ef00c
Bowran, H.
d71babd0-8f9b-4581-a196-e680d7ea0688
Roberts, L.
0a937943-5246-4877-bd6b-4dcd172b5cd0
Garo-Falides, J.
fd3934bd-402b-4b94-8aa8-1c9ebb9ef00c
Bowran, H.
d71babd0-8f9b-4581-a196-e680d7ea0688

Roberts, L., Garo-Falides, J. and Bowran, H. (2015) Non-attendance in musculoskeletal outpatients: the good, the bad and the ugly. [in special issue: World Confederation for Physical Therapy Congress 2015 Abstracts, Singapore, 1-4 May 2015] Physiotherapy, 101, supplement S1, e1289-e1290. (doi:10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.1205).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Non-attendance, i.e. the failure of patients to keep scheduled outpatient appointments, is well recognised. In England, of the 100.5 million outpatient appointments made between April 2013 and March 2014, 7.0 million (6.9%) were reportedly not attended. National non-attendance rates for physical therapy are unknown.

Non-attendance is claimed to increase health costs, lower productivity and disrupt patient flow, resulting in poor access to health care, longer waiting lists, delays in diagnosis and treatment, sub-optimal care and poor clinical outcomes. However, the empirical evidence for these claims is limited.

Understanding the causal chain to determine whether non-attendance is a voluntary behaviour, or whether there are underlying health system characteristics beyond the patient's control, is essential in designing interventions to reduce non-attendance rates.

Purpose: To identify why patients fail to complete physical therapy care episodes, using mixed methods, in multiple musculoskeletal outpatient settings.

Methods: An observational, longitudinal study was undertaken in one primary care musculoskeletal service, with 15 patients, purposively sampled and referred with low back pain. All physical therapy appointments were observed and audio-recorded. The clinicians and patients were interviewed about their physical therapy assessments and treatments, and a thematic analysis was undertaken, using a framework approach.

In addition, two postal surveys were undertaken, in physical therapy departments in a large teaching hospital and a small community hospital, using retrospective sampling. Patients who had attended the department at least once in the last 12 months and failed to complete their care were sent a 25-item checklist about the reasons for not finishing their physical therapy, with space for free text.

Results: In the observational study 8/15 patients did not complete their care. The interviews (in patients’ homes) revealed rich data about their decision to not attend, with some mismatches evident between patients’ and clinicians’ perceptions, in the multiple factors identified.

In the teaching hospital, 12/50 (24%) of the questionnaires were returned, with a mean of 1 factor cited for not attending (range 0–5). The top 3 reasons reported for non-attendance were: ‘my condition improved’ (17%); ‘no improvement with physiotherapy’ (17%); and ‘advised not to attend by another health care professional’ (17%).

There were 25 mailed and 5 telephone responses to the 77 questionnaires in the community hospital (39%), with a mean of 2.1 factors cited for not attending (range 1–6). The top 3 reasons for non-attendance were: ‘no improvement with physiotherapy’ (27%); ‘my condition improved’ (23%); and ‘other health issues took priority (23%).

Conclusion(s): The factors influencing non-attendance in three musculoskeletal outpatient services included voluntary behaviours by the patient, behaviours exhibited by other patients, service constraints, environmental factors and resolution of symptoms. A mixed methods approach to understand the reasons for non-attendance enabled depth of data through the qualitative interviews and breadth through the surveys. Systematic collection of non-attendance data is recommended using mixed methods, to identify the contributing factors from the patients’ perspective.

Implications: Identifying local reasons for non-attendance, directly from patients, could help in designing and implementing initiatives to reduce non-attendance in physical therapy services and enhance efficiency.

Text
Non-attendance in musculoskeletal outpatients the good, the bad and the ugly.pdf - Other
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 3 May 2015
Keywords: non-attendance, service delivery, musculoskeletal
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 380997
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/380997
ISSN: 0031-9406
PURE UUID: b14c3ac4-4eb4-45ed-a2db-e660eb6db959
ORCID for L. Roberts: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2662-6696

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Sep 2015 10:41
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:53

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: L. Roberts ORCID iD
Author: J. Garo-Falides
Author: H. Bowran

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×