On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: the case for the universality of self-esteem
On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: the case for the universality of self-esteem
Do self-enhancement/self-protection and self-esteem reflect fundamental human motivations or are they culturally bound occurrences? The debate on universalism versus cultural relativism of self-motives and self-esteem shows no sign of abatement. We advance the debate by proposing the extended self-enhancing tactician model. The model aspires to account for two seemingly contradictory phenomena: cross-cultural invariance (equivalence of self-motive strength and self-esteem desire across cultures) and cross-cultural variability (differential manifestations of self-motives and self-esteem across cultures). The model's four foundational tenets address cross-cultural invariance: (1) The individual self is panculturally valued, and it is so over the relational or collective self; (2) The self-enhancement/self-protection motives are equally potent in East and West; (3) The structure of self-enhancement and self-protection strivings is similar across the cultural divide; and (4) the desire for self-esteem is pancultural. The SCENT-R model's four key postulates address cross-cultural variability. First, Easterners assign relative importance to, and report higher, liking-based self-esteem, as well as consider collectivistic attributes important and self-enhance on them, whereas Westerners assign relative importance to, and report higher, competence-based self-esteem, as well as consider individualistic attributes important and self-enhance on them. Second, when constraints on candid self-enhancement are lifted, Easterners behave like Westerners: they report higher modesty and lower self-esteem than Westerners, but, controlling for modesty, differences in self-esteem disappear; they self-enhance in competitive, but self-efface in cooperative, settings; they profit from other-mediated than own-initiated self-enhancement. Third, implicit self-esteem is similarly high across cultures. Fourth, self-esteem and self-enhancement/self-protection confer parallel benefits in East–West, depending in part on domain relevance. Self-enhancement and self-protection, as well as self-esteem, reflect fundamental human motivation
culture, motivation, self, self-enhancement, self-esteem, self-protection
978-0-12-802270-2
185-241
Sedikides, C.
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Gaertner, L.
66825abf-c97c-446c-afc1-966bc950df25
Cai, H.
b50ecca5-ee0a-4778-94b6-598959608574
2015
Sedikides, C.
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Gaertner, L.
66825abf-c97c-446c-afc1-966bc950df25
Cai, H.
b50ecca5-ee0a-4778-94b6-598959608574
Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L. and Cai, H.
(2015)
On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: the case for the universality of self-esteem.
In,
Elliot, Andrew J.
(ed.)
Advances in Motivation Science.
Elsevier, .
(doi:10.1016/bs.adms.2015.04.002).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
Do self-enhancement/self-protection and self-esteem reflect fundamental human motivations or are they culturally bound occurrences? The debate on universalism versus cultural relativism of self-motives and self-esteem shows no sign of abatement. We advance the debate by proposing the extended self-enhancing tactician model. The model aspires to account for two seemingly contradictory phenomena: cross-cultural invariance (equivalence of self-motive strength and self-esteem desire across cultures) and cross-cultural variability (differential manifestations of self-motives and self-esteem across cultures). The model's four foundational tenets address cross-cultural invariance: (1) The individual self is panculturally valued, and it is so over the relational or collective self; (2) The self-enhancement/self-protection motives are equally potent in East and West; (3) The structure of self-enhancement and self-protection strivings is similar across the cultural divide; and (4) the desire for self-esteem is pancultural. The SCENT-R model's four key postulates address cross-cultural variability. First, Easterners assign relative importance to, and report higher, liking-based self-esteem, as well as consider collectivistic attributes important and self-enhance on them, whereas Westerners assign relative importance to, and report higher, competence-based self-esteem, as well as consider individualistic attributes important and self-enhance on them. Second, when constraints on candid self-enhancement are lifted, Easterners behave like Westerners: they report higher modesty and lower self-esteem than Westerners, but, controlling for modesty, differences in self-esteem disappear; they self-enhance in competitive, but self-efface in cooperative, settings; they profit from other-mediated than own-initiated self-enhancement. Third, implicit self-esteem is similarly high across cultures. Fourth, self-esteem and self-enhancement/self-protection confer parallel benefits in East–West, depending in part on domain relevance. Self-enhancement and self-protection, as well as self-esteem, reflect fundamental human motivation
Text
__soton.ac.uk_ude_PersonalFiles_Users_gg_mydocuments_constantine publications pdf's_2015_Sedikides, Gaertner, & Cai, 2015eprints.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 2015
Keywords:
culture, motivation, self, self-enhancement, self-esteem, self-protection
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 381166
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/381166
ISBN: 978-0-12-802270-2
PURE UUID: 93304469-2244-4e62-a724-e59c4655729b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Sep 2015 13:34
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:02
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
L. Gaertner
Author:
H. Cai
Editor:
Andrew J. Elliot
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics