The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Feather roughness reduces flow separation during low Reynolds number glides of swifts

Feather roughness reduces flow separation during low Reynolds number glides of swifts
Feather roughness reduces flow separation during low Reynolds number glides of swifts
Swifts are aerodynamically sophisticated birds with a small arm and large hand wing that provides them with exquisite control over their glide performance. However, their hand wings have a seemingly unsophisticated surface roughness that is poised to disturb flow. This roughness of about 2% chord length is formed by the valleys and ridges of overlapping primary feathers with thick protruding rachides, which make the wing stiffer. An earlier flow study of laminar–turbulent boundary layer transition over prepared swift wings suggests that swifts can attain laminar flow at low angle-of-attack. In contrast, aerodynamic design theory suggests that airfoils must be extremely smooth to attain such laminar flow. In hummingbirds, which have similarly rough wings, flow measurements on a 3D printed model suggests that the flow separates at the leading edge and becomes turbulent well above the rachis bumps in a detached shear layer. The aerodynamic function of wing roughness in small birds is, therefore, not fully understood. Here we perform particle image velocimetry and force measurements to compare smooth versus rough 3D-printed models of the swift hand wing. The high-resolution boundary layer measurements show that the flow over rough wings is indeed laminar at low angle-of-attack and Reynolds number, but becomes turbulent at higher values. In contrast, the boundary layer over the smooth wing forms open laminar separation bubbles that extend beyond the trailing edge. The boundary layer dynamics of the smooth surface varies nonlinear as a function of angle-of-attack and Reynolds number, whereas the rough surface boasts more consistent turbulent boundary layer dynamics. Comparison of the corresponding drag values, lift values, and glide ratios suggests, however, that glide performance is equivalent. The increased structural performance, boundary layer robustness, and equivalent aerodynamic performance of rough wings might have provided small (proto) birds with an evolutionary window to high glide performance.
0022-0949
3179-3191
van Bokhorst, Evelien
a76540c2-3291-49e1-9d69-61ecc433b406
de Kat, Roeland
d46a99a4-8653-4698-9ef4-46dd0c77ba5d
Elsinga, Gerrit E.
7bae8ba5-9821-48c4-9a51-f46ffab05922
Lentink, David
25389990-daa2-4511-80aa-3f60f184df33
van Bokhorst, Evelien
a76540c2-3291-49e1-9d69-61ecc433b406
de Kat, Roeland
d46a99a4-8653-4698-9ef4-46dd0c77ba5d
Elsinga, Gerrit E.
7bae8ba5-9821-48c4-9a51-f46ffab05922
Lentink, David
25389990-daa2-4511-80aa-3f60f184df33

van Bokhorst, Evelien, de Kat, Roeland, Elsinga, Gerrit E. and Lentink, David (2015) Feather roughness reduces flow separation during low Reynolds number glides of swifts. Journal of Experimental Biology, 218 (20), 3179-3191. (doi:10.1242/jeb.121426).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Swifts are aerodynamically sophisticated birds with a small arm and large hand wing that provides them with exquisite control over their glide performance. However, their hand wings have a seemingly unsophisticated surface roughness that is poised to disturb flow. This roughness of about 2% chord length is formed by the valleys and ridges of overlapping primary feathers with thick protruding rachides, which make the wing stiffer. An earlier flow study of laminar–turbulent boundary layer transition over prepared swift wings suggests that swifts can attain laminar flow at low angle-of-attack. In contrast, aerodynamic design theory suggests that airfoils must be extremely smooth to attain such laminar flow. In hummingbirds, which have similarly rough wings, flow measurements on a 3D printed model suggests that the flow separates at the leading edge and becomes turbulent well above the rachis bumps in a detached shear layer. The aerodynamic function of wing roughness in small birds is, therefore, not fully understood. Here we perform particle image velocimetry and force measurements to compare smooth versus rough 3D-printed models of the swift hand wing. The high-resolution boundary layer measurements show that the flow over rough wings is indeed laminar at low angle-of-attack and Reynolds number, but becomes turbulent at higher values. In contrast, the boundary layer over the smooth wing forms open laminar separation bubbles that extend beyond the trailing edge. The boundary layer dynamics of the smooth surface varies nonlinear as a function of angle-of-attack and Reynolds number, whereas the rough surface boasts more consistent turbulent boundary layer dynamics. Comparison of the corresponding drag values, lift values, and glide ratios suggests, however, that glide performance is equivalent. The increased structural performance, boundary layer robustness, and equivalent aerodynamic performance of rough wings might have provided small (proto) birds with an evolutionary window to high glide performance.

Text
J Exp Biol-2015-van Bokhorst-jeb.121426.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (3MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 6 August 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 September 2015
Published date: 2015
Organisations: Aerodynamics & Flight Mechanics Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 381461
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/381461
ISSN: 0022-0949
PURE UUID: 8971d86d-b080-443e-b405-002c0be7bde9
ORCID for Roeland de Kat: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6851-4409

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Oct 2015 13:37
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 21:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Evelien van Bokhorst
Author: Roeland de Kat ORCID iD
Author: Gerrit E. Elsinga
Author: David Lentink

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×