The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Lymphocyte telomere length is long in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers regardless of cancer-affected status

Lymphocyte telomere length is long in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers regardless of cancer-affected status
Lymphocyte telomere length is long in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers regardless of cancer-affected status
BACKGROUND:
Telomere length has been linked to risk of common diseases, including cancer, and has previously been proposed as a biomarker for cancer risk. Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations predispose to breast, ovarian, and other cancer types.

METHODS:
We investigated telomere length in BRCA mutation carriers and their non-carrier relatives and further examined whether telomere length is a modifier of cancer risk in mutation carriers. We measured mean telomere length in DNA extracted from whole blood using high-throughput quantitative PCR. Participants were from the EMBRACE study in United Kingdom and Eire (n = 4,822) and comprised BRCA1 (n = 1,628) and BRCA2 (n = 1,506) mutation carriers and their non-carrier relatives (n = 1,688).

RESULTS:
We find no significant evidence that mean telomere length is associated with breast or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA mutation carriers. However, we find mutation carriers to have longer mean telomere length than their non-carrier relatives (all carriers vs. non-carriers, Ptrend = 0.0018), particularly in families with BRCA2 mutations (BRCA2 mutation carriers vs. all non-carriers, Ptrend = 0.0016).

CONCLUSIONS:
Our findings lend little support to the hypothesis that short mean telomere length predisposes to cancer. Conversely, our main and unexpected finding is that BRCA mutation carriers (regardless of cancer status) have longer telomeres than their non-mutation carrier, non-cancer-affected relatives. The longer telomere length in BRCA2 mutation carriers is consistent with its role in DNA damage response. Overall, it seems that increased telomere length may be a consequence of these mutations, but is not itself directly related to the increased cancer risk in carriers.

IMPACT:
The finding that mutation carriers have longer mean telomere lengths than their non-carrier relatives is unexpected but biologically plausible and could open up new lines of research into the functions of the BRCA proteins. To our knowledge, this is the largest study of telomere length in BRCA mutation carriers and their relatives. The null cancer-risk association supports recent large prospective studies of breast and ovarian cancer and indicates that mean telomere length would not be a useful biomarker in these cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(6); 1018-24.
1018-1024
Pooley, K.A.
965a7580-d42e-4cec-81b1-9efbbd653acf
McGuffog, L.
8b274aa8-90b9-488f-870d-59ab2f3f3a1c
Barrowdale, D.
29a3f932-a715-4cb5-82e4-2126f62f8b0c
Frost, D.
aacda8ac-d343-4d95-a2d4-5c95a98072f2
Ellis, S.D.
a2821c0b-6b20-4be0-b0bd-0ea37d5ad1c3
Fineberg, E.
e60ff694-b95e-4204-8c9e-1f20f23bce8b
Platte, R.
6401fb23-5b0e-4c9f-8a45-100dd0f17d6d
Izatt, L.
5cabcdef-374a-4441-b571-9c7b1665b720
Adlard, J.
38e0d937-9ad6-420a-90d9-a8e602955e73
Bardwell, J.
25b82966-a439-4375-8b97-8c1597ae00b7
Brewer, C.
f50e5721-93d3-43ef-8cd2-572f238d04be
Cole, T.
5330af8b-76ec-4957-87b2-3aa3580a74c0
Cook, J.
45c40993-978e-496e-9922-65774f13985e
Davidson, R.
9f684474-a989-4d8c-988c-a42e3d19db25
Donaldson, A.
ea10ac5a-4f77-4ef5-91d5-7f32ea33db36
Dorkins, H.
c5c983b7-709c-4580-b98c-771a57aa31f0
Douglas, F.
9dc3db90-827e-419d-86f1-48e22b6845ab
Eason, J.
8259442f-7b72-4b76-9a30-fa549384bbe0
Houghton, C.
8d7598b1-daf0-44c0-80ba-4ff2a2a104fe
Kennedy, M.J.
617fefc1-ee68-48ca-9fd6-66ef3733b442
McCann, E.
847633f8-dcc5-4e53-8647-df45fbac2a5f
Miedzybrodzka, Z.
88cf9144-bcf0-4490-a0e4-21d0df095155
Murray, A.
d80b2bea-5bde-448f-a1d2-c5627db1df99
Porteous, M.E.
e9bac242-13be-4b4b-bb8c-5ac6b8835e8c
Rogers, M.T.
fbdb3c18-7bd3-42ae-8919-78433e498a11
Side, L.E.
35b06306-9246-4d20-887a-4472912fcf11
Tischkowitz, M.
d479aaea-0e4f-4f55-bc25-25fb599e7668
Walker, L.
99ada328-aeda-4264-8fc8-3154e2090265
Hodgson, S.
745600cf-b91f-4f39-9b5e-4f76989d268f
Eccles, D.M.
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
Morrison, P. J.
b2d85956-d63c-4d00-b8ed-b821a43eae4f
Evans, D.G.
b58c99fc-4da0-4d7e-b140-f22307befe5e
Eeles, R.A.
b4d711ae-9a55-4557-ad7a-1071488185bb
Antoniou, A.C.
6dc040a0-bd30-4178-995b-ca6f237949e1
Easton, D.F.
ef4b7694-86fa-4568-969f-d0ee512127fc
Dunning, A.M.
1e319e8b-20d9-4032-ae08-cac48ff41786
Pooley, K.A.
965a7580-d42e-4cec-81b1-9efbbd653acf
McGuffog, L.
8b274aa8-90b9-488f-870d-59ab2f3f3a1c
Barrowdale, D.
29a3f932-a715-4cb5-82e4-2126f62f8b0c
Frost, D.
aacda8ac-d343-4d95-a2d4-5c95a98072f2
Ellis, S.D.
a2821c0b-6b20-4be0-b0bd-0ea37d5ad1c3
Fineberg, E.
e60ff694-b95e-4204-8c9e-1f20f23bce8b
Platte, R.
6401fb23-5b0e-4c9f-8a45-100dd0f17d6d
Izatt, L.
5cabcdef-374a-4441-b571-9c7b1665b720
Adlard, J.
38e0d937-9ad6-420a-90d9-a8e602955e73
Bardwell, J.
25b82966-a439-4375-8b97-8c1597ae00b7
Brewer, C.
f50e5721-93d3-43ef-8cd2-572f238d04be
Cole, T.
5330af8b-76ec-4957-87b2-3aa3580a74c0
Cook, J.
45c40993-978e-496e-9922-65774f13985e
Davidson, R.
9f684474-a989-4d8c-988c-a42e3d19db25
Donaldson, A.
ea10ac5a-4f77-4ef5-91d5-7f32ea33db36
Dorkins, H.
c5c983b7-709c-4580-b98c-771a57aa31f0
Douglas, F.
9dc3db90-827e-419d-86f1-48e22b6845ab
Eason, J.
8259442f-7b72-4b76-9a30-fa549384bbe0
Houghton, C.
8d7598b1-daf0-44c0-80ba-4ff2a2a104fe
Kennedy, M.J.
617fefc1-ee68-48ca-9fd6-66ef3733b442
McCann, E.
847633f8-dcc5-4e53-8647-df45fbac2a5f
Miedzybrodzka, Z.
88cf9144-bcf0-4490-a0e4-21d0df095155
Murray, A.
d80b2bea-5bde-448f-a1d2-c5627db1df99
Porteous, M.E.
e9bac242-13be-4b4b-bb8c-5ac6b8835e8c
Rogers, M.T.
fbdb3c18-7bd3-42ae-8919-78433e498a11
Side, L.E.
35b06306-9246-4d20-887a-4472912fcf11
Tischkowitz, M.
d479aaea-0e4f-4f55-bc25-25fb599e7668
Walker, L.
99ada328-aeda-4264-8fc8-3154e2090265
Hodgson, S.
745600cf-b91f-4f39-9b5e-4f76989d268f
Eccles, D.M.
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
Morrison, P. J.
b2d85956-d63c-4d00-b8ed-b821a43eae4f
Evans, D.G.
b58c99fc-4da0-4d7e-b140-f22307befe5e
Eeles, R.A.
b4d711ae-9a55-4557-ad7a-1071488185bb
Antoniou, A.C.
6dc040a0-bd30-4178-995b-ca6f237949e1
Easton, D.F.
ef4b7694-86fa-4568-969f-d0ee512127fc
Dunning, A.M.
1e319e8b-20d9-4032-ae08-cac48ff41786

Pooley, K.A., McGuffog, L. and Barrowdale, D. et al. (2014) Lymphocyte telomere length is long in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers regardless of cancer-affected status. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 23 (6), 1018-1024. (doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0635-T). (PMID:24642354)

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND:
Telomere length has been linked to risk of common diseases, including cancer, and has previously been proposed as a biomarker for cancer risk. Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations predispose to breast, ovarian, and other cancer types.

METHODS:
We investigated telomere length in BRCA mutation carriers and their non-carrier relatives and further examined whether telomere length is a modifier of cancer risk in mutation carriers. We measured mean telomere length in DNA extracted from whole blood using high-throughput quantitative PCR. Participants were from the EMBRACE study in United Kingdom and Eire (n = 4,822) and comprised BRCA1 (n = 1,628) and BRCA2 (n = 1,506) mutation carriers and their non-carrier relatives (n = 1,688).

RESULTS:
We find no significant evidence that mean telomere length is associated with breast or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA mutation carriers. However, we find mutation carriers to have longer mean telomere length than their non-carrier relatives (all carriers vs. non-carriers, Ptrend = 0.0018), particularly in families with BRCA2 mutations (BRCA2 mutation carriers vs. all non-carriers, Ptrend = 0.0016).

CONCLUSIONS:
Our findings lend little support to the hypothesis that short mean telomere length predisposes to cancer. Conversely, our main and unexpected finding is that BRCA mutation carriers (regardless of cancer status) have longer telomeres than their non-mutation carrier, non-cancer-affected relatives. The longer telomere length in BRCA2 mutation carriers is consistent with its role in DNA damage response. Overall, it seems that increased telomere length may be a consequence of these mutations, but is not itself directly related to the increased cancer risk in carriers.

IMPACT:
The finding that mutation carriers have longer mean telomere lengths than their non-carrier relatives is unexpected but biologically plausible and could open up new lines of research into the functions of the BRCA proteins. To our knowledge, this is the largest study of telomere length in BRCA mutation carriers and their relatives. The null cancer-risk association supports recent large prospective studies of breast and ovarian cancer and indicates that mean telomere length would not be a useful biomarker in these cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(6); 1018-24.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 28 February 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 March 2014
Published date: 23 June 2014
Organisations: Cancer Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 382483
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/382483
PURE UUID: e944462f-777c-450d-9f91-6c380560dcf1
ORCID for D.M. Eccles: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9935-3169

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Oct 2015 09:43
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: K.A. Pooley
Author: L. McGuffog
Author: D. Barrowdale
Author: D. Frost
Author: S.D. Ellis
Author: E. Fineberg
Author: R. Platte
Author: L. Izatt
Author: J. Adlard
Author: J. Bardwell
Author: C. Brewer
Author: T. Cole
Author: J. Cook
Author: R. Davidson
Author: A. Donaldson
Author: H. Dorkins
Author: F. Douglas
Author: J. Eason
Author: C. Houghton
Author: M.J. Kennedy
Author: E. McCann
Author: Z. Miedzybrodzka
Author: A. Murray
Author: M.E. Porteous
Author: M.T. Rogers
Author: L.E. Side
Author: M. Tischkowitz
Author: L. Walker
Author: S. Hodgson
Author: D.M. Eccles ORCID iD
Author: P. J. Morrison
Author: D.G. Evans
Author: R.A. Eeles
Author: A.C. Antoniou
Author: D.F. Easton
Author: A.M. Dunning

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×