The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A Model to Compare Cloud and non-Cloud Storage of Big Data

A Model to Compare Cloud and non-Cloud Storage of Big Data
A Model to Compare Cloud and non-Cloud Storage of Big Data
When comparing Cloud and non-Cloud Storage it can be difficult to ensure that the comparison is fair. In this paper we examine the process of setting up such a comparison and the metric used. Performance comparisons on Cloud and non Cloud systems, deployed for biomedical scientists, have been conducted to identify improvements of efficiency and performance. Prior to the experiments, network latency, file size and job failures were identified as factors which degrade performance and experiments were conducted to understand their impacts. Organizational Sustainability Modeling (OSM) is used before, during and after the experiments to ensure fair comparisons are achieved. OSM defines the actual and expected execution time, risk control rates and is used to understand key outputs related to both Cloud and non-Cloud experiments. Forty experiments on both Cloud and non Cloud systems were undertaken with two case studies. The first case study was focused on transferring and backing up 10,000 files of 1 GB each and the second case study was focused on transferring and backing up 1,000 files 10 GB each. Results showed that first, the actual and expected execution time on the Cloud was lower than on the non-Cloud system. Second, there was more than 99% consistency between the actual and expected execution time on the Cloud while no comparable consistency was found on the non-Cloud system. Third, the improvement in efficiency was higher on the Cloud than the non-Cloud. OSM is the metric used to analyze the collected data and provided synthesis and insights to the data analysis and visualization of the two case studies.
Organizational Sustainability Modeling (OSM), Comparison between Cloud and non-Cloud storage platforms, Real Cloud case studies, data analysis and visualization.
Chang, Victor
a7c75287-b649-4a63-a26c-6af6f26525a4
Wills, Gary
3a594558-6921-4e82-8098-38cd8d4e8aa0
Chang, Victor
a7c75287-b649-4a63-a26c-6af6f26525a4
Wills, Gary
3a594558-6921-4e82-8098-38cd8d4e8aa0

Chang, Victor and Wills, Gary (2016) A Model to Compare Cloud and non-Cloud Storage of Big Data. Future Generation Computer Systems. (doi:10.1016/j.future.2015.10.003).

Record type: Article

Abstract

When comparing Cloud and non-Cloud Storage it can be difficult to ensure that the comparison is fair. In this paper we examine the process of setting up such a comparison and the metric used. Performance comparisons on Cloud and non Cloud systems, deployed for biomedical scientists, have been conducted to identify improvements of efficiency and performance. Prior to the experiments, network latency, file size and job failures were identified as factors which degrade performance and experiments were conducted to understand their impacts. Organizational Sustainability Modeling (OSM) is used before, during and after the experiments to ensure fair comparisons are achieved. OSM defines the actual and expected execution time, risk control rates and is used to understand key outputs related to both Cloud and non-Cloud experiments. Forty experiments on both Cloud and non Cloud systems were undertaken with two case studies. The first case study was focused on transferring and backing up 10,000 files of 1 GB each and the second case study was focused on transferring and backing up 1,000 files 10 GB each. Results showed that first, the actual and expected execution time on the Cloud was lower than on the non-Cloud system. Second, there was more than 99% consistency between the actual and expected execution time on the Cloud while no comparable consistency was found on the non-Cloud system. Third, the improvement in efficiency was higher on the Cloud than the non-Cloud. OSM is the metric used to analyze the collected data and provided synthesis and insights to the data analysis and visualization of the two case studies.

Text
VC_FGCS_stor_per_cloud_BD_accepted.pdf - Other
Download (810kB)

More information

Published date: March 2016
Keywords: Organizational Sustainability Modeling (OSM), Comparison between Cloud and non-Cloud storage platforms, Real Cloud case studies, data analysis and visualization.
Organisations: Electronics & Computer Science, Electronic & Software Systems

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 382709
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/382709
PURE UUID: 29eb9425-7c53-41ba-9409-65d949291366
ORCID for Gary Wills: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5771-4088

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Oct 2015 11:16
Last modified: 15 Aug 2019 00:53

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Victor Chang
Author: Gary Wills ORCID iD

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×