The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Aesthetics and ascetics

Aesthetics and ascetics
Aesthetics and ascetics
The aim of this dissertation is to offer a revaluation of several (related) phenomena that, it is argued here, are too readily omitted from, unjustifiedly maligned by, or inadequately accounted for in the considerations of philosophers of aesthetics: the phenomena of asceticism, the grotesque, and the (visual) arts of the (Christian) Middle Ages (in which, incidentally, the ascetic and the grotesque (are commonly considered to) coalesce). The first step towards such a revaluation is a reappraisal of philosophical aesthetics itself, which is undertaken here in Chapter One. This is followed, in the latter half of Chapter One and in Chapter Two, by a (re)appraisal of (the reception and representation of) asceticism, and a (re)valuation of the grotesque. Chapters Three and Four are given over to a more detailed account of what is (claimed here to be) entailed by the aesthetic endeavour, by the ascetic’s peculiar investment therein, and what “lessons” may be learned from his example.
Reicher, Nina
f63e2595-3678-454f-96ac-afa8d8018abc
Reicher, Nina
f63e2595-3678-454f-96ac-afa8d8018abc
Neill, Alex
356f9035-0820-4df8-838d-94b5bd219814
Ridley, Aaron
64d82169-aa92-4352-975d-2ef8bb3f2cc7
McManus, Denis
95bb0718-d3fa-4982-9cde-05ac00b5bb24

Reicher, Nina (2015) Aesthetics and ascetics. University of Southampton, Faculty of Humanities, Masters Thesis, 130pp.

Record type: Thesis (Masters)

Abstract

The aim of this dissertation is to offer a revaluation of several (related) phenomena that, it is argued here, are too readily omitted from, unjustifiedly maligned by, or inadequately accounted for in the considerations of philosophers of aesthetics: the phenomena of asceticism, the grotesque, and the (visual) arts of the (Christian) Middle Ages (in which, incidentally, the ascetic and the grotesque (are commonly considered to) coalesce). The first step towards such a revaluation is a reappraisal of philosophical aesthetics itself, which is undertaken here in Chapter One. This is followed, in the latter half of Chapter One and in Chapter Two, by a (re)appraisal of (the reception and representation of) asceticism, and a (re)valuation of the grotesque. Chapters Three and Four are given over to a more detailed account of what is (claimed here to be) entailed by the aesthetic endeavour, by the ascetic’s peculiar investment therein, and what “lessons” may be learned from his example.

Text
ReicherMPhil.pdf - Other
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: April 2015
Organisations: University of Southampton, Philosophy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 383144
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/383144
PURE UUID: f0179696-f3d5-4904-89c7-9d63851f204e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Nov 2015 13:52
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 21:39

Export record

Contributors

Author: Nina Reicher
Thesis advisor: Alex Neill
Thesis advisor: Aaron Ridley
Thesis advisor: Denis McManus

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×