Blame avoidance in comparative perspective: reactivity, staged retreat and efficacy
Blame avoidance in comparative perspective: reactivity, staged retreat and efficacy
Building on blame-avoidance analysis, this paper develops a method to assess the reactivity, sequencing and efficacy of defensive responses by officeholders facing a crisis of personal blame, analysing cases drawn from four advanced democracies. It tests the hypotheses that officeholders: react by positive action rather than non-engagement when blame levels are high; respond in a ‘staged retreat’ sequence; and can reduce the level of blame they face from one day to another through choice of presentational strategies. The paper applies event history analysis to test the sequencing hypothesis and time series cross-sectional models to test the reactivity and efficacy hypotheses. The analysis shows that officeholders tend to respond actively when blame levels are high, that to some extent their responses tend to follow a staged retreat pattern, and their interventions have a systematic effect on the next day’s media blame level only if they take the form of personal statements
542-562
Hood, Christopher
37c09ae1-5715-4188-94b6-3328e374370c
Jennings, Will
2ab3f11c-eb7f-44c6-9ef2-3180c1a954f7
Copeland, Paul
3f5430b5-0fb4-4e36-a3a4-8e95283a53f4
28 December 2015
Hood, Christopher
37c09ae1-5715-4188-94b6-3328e374370c
Jennings, Will
2ab3f11c-eb7f-44c6-9ef2-3180c1a954f7
Copeland, Paul
3f5430b5-0fb4-4e36-a3a4-8e95283a53f4
Hood, Christopher, Jennings, Will and Copeland, Paul
(2015)
Blame avoidance in comparative perspective: reactivity, staged retreat and efficacy.
Public Administration, 94 (2), .
(doi:10.1111/padm.12235).
Abstract
Building on blame-avoidance analysis, this paper develops a method to assess the reactivity, sequencing and efficacy of defensive responses by officeholders facing a crisis of personal blame, analysing cases drawn from four advanced democracies. It tests the hypotheses that officeholders: react by positive action rather than non-engagement when blame levels are high; respond in a ‘staged retreat’ sequence; and can reduce the level of blame they face from one day to another through choice of presentational strategies. The paper applies event history analysis to test the sequencing hypothesis and time series cross-sectional models to test the reactivity and efficacy hypotheses. The analysis shows that officeholders tend to respond actively when blame levels are high, that to some extent their responses tend to follow a staged retreat pattern, and their interventions have a systematic effect on the next day’s media blame level only if they take the form of personal statements
Text
PADM_AcceptedVersion.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 15 October 2015
Published date: 28 December 2015
Organisations:
Politics & International Relations
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 383322
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/383322
ISSN: 0033-3298
PURE UUID: 1511983e-6d00-4f19-a50e-8ad038d3d3d1
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Nov 2015 11:29
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:42
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Christopher Hood
Author:
Paul Copeland
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics