The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Using the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork (EAST) to explore conflicts between different road user groups when making right hand turns at urban intersections

Using the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork (EAST) to explore conflicts between different road user groups when making right hand turns at urban intersections
Using the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork (EAST) to explore conflicts between different road user groups when making right hand turns at urban intersections
Collisions between different types of road users at intersections form a substantial component of the road toll. This paper presents an analysis of driver, cyclist, motorcyclist and pedestrian behaviour at intersections that involved the application of an integrated suite of ergonomics methods, the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork (EAST) framework, to on-road study data. EAST was used to analyse behaviour at three intersections using data derived from an on-road study of driver, cyclist, motorcyclist and pedestrian behaviour. The analysis shows the differences in behaviour and cognition across the different road user groups and pinpoints instances where this may be creating conflicts between different road users. The role of intersection design in creating these differences in behaviour and resulting conflicts is discussed. It is concluded that currently intersections are not designed in a way that supports behaviour across the four forms of road user studied. Interventions designed to improve intersection safety are discussed. Practitioner Summary: Intersection safety currently represents a key road safety issue worldwide. This paper presents a novel application of a framework of ergonomics methods for studying differences in road user behaviour at intersections. The findings support development of interventions that consider all road users as opposed to one group in isolation.
intersections, road safety, EAST, systems analysis, drivers, cyclists, motorcyclists, pedestrians
0169-8141
1628-1642
Salmon, P.M.
e96abc65-12e8-4c75-8c1c-1cb986e0492f
Lenne, M.G.
885d4396-ec78-4bf9-aac3-c7fb4eb414ae
Walker, G.H.
79e57e9e-7e21-4d38-8267-5fb68fa3469b
Filtness, A.
1e77f123-60b3-4ac8-be01-b3920509be6c
Stanton, N.A.
351a44ab-09a0-422a-a738-01df1fe0fadd
Salmon, P.M.
e96abc65-12e8-4c75-8c1c-1cb986e0492f
Lenne, M.G.
885d4396-ec78-4bf9-aac3-c7fb4eb414ae
Walker, G.H.
79e57e9e-7e21-4d38-8267-5fb68fa3469b
Filtness, A.
1e77f123-60b3-4ac8-be01-b3920509be6c
Stanton, N.A.
351a44ab-09a0-422a-a738-01df1fe0fadd

Salmon, P.M., Lenne, M.G., Walker, G.H., Filtness, A. and Stanton, N.A. (2014) Using the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork (EAST) to explore conflicts between different road user groups when making right hand turns at urban intersections. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 57 (11), 1628-1642. (doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.945491). (PMID:25205241)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Collisions between different types of road users at intersections form a substantial component of the road toll. This paper presents an analysis of driver, cyclist, motorcyclist and pedestrian behaviour at intersections that involved the application of an integrated suite of ergonomics methods, the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork (EAST) framework, to on-road study data. EAST was used to analyse behaviour at three intersections using data derived from an on-road study of driver, cyclist, motorcyclist and pedestrian behaviour. The analysis shows the differences in behaviour and cognition across the different road user groups and pinpoints instances where this may be creating conflicts between different road users. The role of intersection design in creating these differences in behaviour and resulting conflicts is discussed. It is concluded that currently intersections are not designed in a way that supports behaviour across the four forms of road user studied. Interventions designed to improve intersection safety are discussed. Practitioner Summary: Intersection safety currently represents a key road safety issue worldwide. This paper presents a novel application of a framework of ergonomics methods for studying differences in road user behaviour at intersections. The findings support development of interventions that consider all road users as opposed to one group in isolation.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 July 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 10 September 2014
Keywords: intersections, road safety, EAST, systems analysis, drivers, cyclists, motorcyclists, pedestrians
Organisations: Transportation Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 383335
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/383335
ISSN: 0169-8141
PURE UUID: 4c87fc18-13df-4e95-b4a6-5b2d706b3d63
ORCID for N.A. Stanton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8562-3279

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Nov 2015 14:42
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:33

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: P.M. Salmon
Author: M.G. Lenne
Author: G.H. Walker
Author: A. Filtness
Author: N.A. Stanton ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×