Probiotics and necrotizing enterocolitis
Probiotics and necrotizing enterocolitis
Probiotics for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis have attracted a huge interest. Combined data from heterogeneous randomised controlled trials suggest that probiotics may decrease the incidence of NEC. However, the individual studies use a variety of probiotic products, and the group at greatest risk of NEC, i.e., those with a birth weight of less than 1000 g, is relatively under-represented in these trials so we do not have adequate evidence of either efficacy or safety to recommend universal prophylactic administration of probiotics to premature infants. These problems have polarized neonatologists, with some taking the view that it is unethical not to universally administer probiotics to premature infants, whereas others regard the meta-analyses as flawed and that there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine probiotic administration. Another problem is that the mechanism by which probiotics might act is not clear, although some experimental evidence is starting to accumulate. This may allow development of surrogate endpoints of effectiveness, refinement of probiotic regimes, or even development of pharmacological agents that may act through the same mechanism. Hence, although routine probiotic administration is controversial, studies of probiotic effects may ultimately lead us to effective means to prevent this devastating disease
1111-1118
Hall, Nigel
6919e8af-3890-42c1-98a7-c110791957cf
Eaton, Simon
e14103c2-c06a-45e6-87fe-2358a3371283
Fleming, Paul
bfc34e43-23e5-42f1-8c7d-d32e86ae93c1
21 September 2015
Hall, Nigel
6919e8af-3890-42c1-98a7-c110791957cf
Eaton, Simon
e14103c2-c06a-45e6-87fe-2358a3371283
Fleming, Paul
bfc34e43-23e5-42f1-8c7d-d32e86ae93c1
Abstract
Probiotics for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis have attracted a huge interest. Combined data from heterogeneous randomised controlled trials suggest that probiotics may decrease the incidence of NEC. However, the individual studies use a variety of probiotic products, and the group at greatest risk of NEC, i.e., those with a birth weight of less than 1000 g, is relatively under-represented in these trials so we do not have adequate evidence of either efficacy or safety to recommend universal prophylactic administration of probiotics to premature infants. These problems have polarized neonatologists, with some taking the view that it is unethical not to universally administer probiotics to premature infants, whereas others regard the meta-analyses as flawed and that there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine probiotic administration. Another problem is that the mechanism by which probiotics might act is not clear, although some experimental evidence is starting to accumulate. This may allow development of surrogate endpoints of effectiveness, refinement of probiotic regimes, or even development of pharmacological agents that may act through the same mechanism. Hence, although routine probiotic administration is controversial, studies of probiotic effects may ultimately lead us to effective means to prevent this devastating disease
Text
Probiotics for NEC PSI 2015.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 31 August 2015
Published date: 21 September 2015
Organisations:
Human Development & Health
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 383715
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/383715
ISSN: 0179-0358
PURE UUID: ed7c0978-a6f7-4860-a8d6-472f061f830f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Nov 2015 15:28
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:38
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Simon Eaton
Author:
Paul Fleming
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics