The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The views of doctors in their first year of medical practice on the lasting impact of a preparation for house officer course they undertook as final year medical students

The views of doctors in their first year of medical practice on the lasting impact of a preparation for house officer course they undertook as final year medical students
The views of doctors in their first year of medical practice on the lasting impact of a preparation for house officer course they undertook as final year medical students
BACKGROUND: The UK General Medical Council recommends that medical students have the opportunity of shadowing the outgoing new doctor whose post they will soon undertake. At the University of Nottingham the two-week shadowing period was preceded by two weeks of lectures/seminars wherein students followed sessions on topics such as common medical/surgical emergencies, contracts, time management, surviving the first two years of clinical practice, careers advice and so on. The present study aimed to gain a better knowledge and understanding of the lasting impact of a four-week preparation course for new Foundation Year 1 doctors [F1 s - interns]. The objectives chosen to achieve this aim were: 1/ to determine the extent to which the lecture/seminar course and shadowing period achieved their stated aim of smoothing the transition from life as a medical student to work as a new doctor; 2/ to evaluate perceptions of the importance of various forms of knowledge in easing the transition between medical student and new doctor

METHOD: In the spring of 2007, 90 graduates from Nottingham were randomly selected and then emailed a link to a short, online survey of quantitative and qualitative questions. Of these 76 responded. Analysis of quantitative data was carried out using SPSS 16.0 and employed McNemar's test. Analysis of the qualitative data was carried out using the constant comparative method.

RESULTS: Only 31% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed that the lecture/seminar part of the course prepared them well for their first FY1 post; 14% agreed that during their first job they drew on the knowledge gained during the lecture/seminar course; 94% strongly agreed or agreed that the shadowing part of the course was more useful than the lecture/seminar part. Experiential knowledge gained in the shadowing was the most highly valued, followed by procedural knowledge with propositional knowledge coming far behind.

CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that new doctors retrospectively value most the knowledge they are able to transfer to the workplace and value least material which seems to repeat what they had learned for their final exams.
1472-6920
48-[9pp]
Matheson, Catherine B.
609d16bf-fe81-4fcd-8f6c-91431c55a9fc
Matheson, David J.
eba46032-8552-450d-b585-3ead28373850
Saunders, John H
d7799029-f634-4656-bce7-d0e5209f752f
Howarth, Claire
08b944b8-2c53-428b-9a66-fcf8273f4a6b
Matheson, Catherine B.
609d16bf-fe81-4fcd-8f6c-91431c55a9fc
Matheson, David J.
eba46032-8552-450d-b585-3ead28373850
Saunders, John H
d7799029-f634-4656-bce7-d0e5209f752f
Howarth, Claire
08b944b8-2c53-428b-9a66-fcf8273f4a6b

Matheson, Catherine B., Matheson, David J., Saunders, John H and Howarth, Claire (2010) The views of doctors in their first year of medical practice on the lasting impact of a preparation for house officer course they undertook as final year medical students. BMC Medical Education, 10 (1), 48-[9pp]. (doi:10.1186/1472-6920-10-48). (PMID:20573253)

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The UK General Medical Council recommends that medical students have the opportunity of shadowing the outgoing new doctor whose post they will soon undertake. At the University of Nottingham the two-week shadowing period was preceded by two weeks of lectures/seminars wherein students followed sessions on topics such as common medical/surgical emergencies, contracts, time management, surviving the first two years of clinical practice, careers advice and so on. The present study aimed to gain a better knowledge and understanding of the lasting impact of a four-week preparation course for new Foundation Year 1 doctors [F1 s - interns]. The objectives chosen to achieve this aim were: 1/ to determine the extent to which the lecture/seminar course and shadowing period achieved their stated aim of smoothing the transition from life as a medical student to work as a new doctor; 2/ to evaluate perceptions of the importance of various forms of knowledge in easing the transition between medical student and new doctor

METHOD: In the spring of 2007, 90 graduates from Nottingham were randomly selected and then emailed a link to a short, online survey of quantitative and qualitative questions. Of these 76 responded. Analysis of quantitative data was carried out using SPSS 16.0 and employed McNemar's test. Analysis of the qualitative data was carried out using the constant comparative method.

RESULTS: Only 31% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed that the lecture/seminar part of the course prepared them well for their first FY1 post; 14% agreed that during their first job they drew on the knowledge gained during the lecture/seminar course; 94% strongly agreed or agreed that the shadowing part of the course was more useful than the lecture/seminar part. Experiential knowledge gained in the shadowing was the most highly valued, followed by procedural knowledge with propositional knowledge coming far behind.

CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that new doctors retrospectively value most the knowledge they are able to transfer to the workplace and value least material which seems to repeat what they had learned for their final exams.

Text
Views of doctors in their first year of medical practice.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (524kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 23 June 2010
Published date: 23 June 2010
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 384035
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/384035
ISSN: 1472-6920
PURE UUID: 5a437e53-ea1b-4b92-893a-d4f523c3d1f5

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Dec 2015 15:26
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 21:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: David J. Matheson
Author: John H Saunders
Author: Claire Howarth

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×