The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Teachers as health promoters: a longitudinal study of the effect of a health education curriculum for trainee teachers on their practice in schools

Teachers as health promoters: a longitudinal study of the effect of a health education curriculum for trainee teachers on their practice in schools
Teachers as health promoters: a longitudinal study of the effect of a health education curriculum for trainee teachers on their practice in schools
Background: teachers have an important role as health promoters; therefore they require adequate training to meet this responsibility. However, little is known about how pre-service health education training affects teachers’ knowledge and attitudes towards promoting health in school once they are qualified. Our research assessed recently qualified teachers’ attitudes towards, experiences of, and perceived confidence and skills for health promotion, up to 3 years after an innovative health curriculum developed at the University of Southampton for pre-service teachers.

Methods: we sent an online and postal 15 min questionnaire to all contactable teachers (n=976) who had qualified at Southampton Education School between 2012 and 2014. It assessed their self-reported attitudes towards promoting health, experiences of and perceived competence and confidence to promote health, and perceptions of their school's health promotion culture and environment. The curriculum consisted of a Health Day with workshops and subsequent school-based tasks, delivered via a multiagency approach. Results are reported as the percentage of all people who responded to a particular question.

Findings: the response rate was 11% (n=104). Positive attitudes towards promoting health were reported by 88 (96·7%) of 91 teachers. 50 (74·6%) of 67 teachers felt that the training had positively influenced their health education teaching. Between 57·3% (55/96) and 87·5% (84/96) felt confident and skilled in teaching ten health-related topics (median 71·9%). The teachers most frequently reported that their life experience (87/95, 91·6%), practical teaching experience (75/94, 79·8%), and support received in school since qualifying (65/93, 69·9%) had been influential in their gaining competence. However, 80 (81·6%) of 98 teachers agreed with the statement that “academic attainment is prioritised over other elements of pupils’ education” in their school.

Interpretation: the low response rate creates possible participation bias and generalisability issues. However, the high proportions of these teachers reporting positive attitudes towards and feeling confident and competent in promoting health suggest a possible longer term positive effect of the training. The findings indicate that teachers value support from colleagues, and practical and life experience for developing competence, but feel that health education is not always prioritised. The Southampton training model could be used by other initial teacher education institutions. Our findings do not indicate, however, how such training could ultimately affect pupils’ health and education outcomes.

Funding: The Leverhulme Trust
teacher training, health and well-being, children and young people, health education, personal, social, health and economic education, pshe
0140-6736
S63
Pickett, Karen
1bac9d88-da29-4a3e-9fd2-e469f129f963
Byrne, Jenny
135bc0f8-7c8a-42d9-bdae-5934b832c4bf
Rietdijk, Willeke
0edd8cf8-a325-43d0-9b08-2268c9e7b7f4
Shepherd, Jonathan
dfbca97a-9307-4eee-bdf7-e27bcb02bc67
Roderick, Paul
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Grace, Marcus
bb019e62-4134-4f74-9e2c-d235a6f89b97
Pickett, Karen
1bac9d88-da29-4a3e-9fd2-e469f129f963
Byrne, Jenny
135bc0f8-7c8a-42d9-bdae-5934b832c4bf
Rietdijk, Willeke
0edd8cf8-a325-43d0-9b08-2268c9e7b7f4
Shepherd, Jonathan
dfbca97a-9307-4eee-bdf7-e27bcb02bc67
Roderick, Paul
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Grace, Marcus
bb019e62-4134-4f74-9e2c-d235a6f89b97

Pickett, Karen, Byrne, Jenny, Rietdijk, Willeke, Shepherd, Jonathan, Roderick, Paul and Grace, Marcus (2015) Teachers as health promoters: a longitudinal study of the effect of a health education curriculum for trainee teachers on their practice in schools. The Lancet, 386, supplement 2, S63. (doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00901-0).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: teachers have an important role as health promoters; therefore they require adequate training to meet this responsibility. However, little is known about how pre-service health education training affects teachers’ knowledge and attitudes towards promoting health in school once they are qualified. Our research assessed recently qualified teachers’ attitudes towards, experiences of, and perceived confidence and skills for health promotion, up to 3 years after an innovative health curriculum developed at the University of Southampton for pre-service teachers.

Methods: we sent an online and postal 15 min questionnaire to all contactable teachers (n=976) who had qualified at Southampton Education School between 2012 and 2014. It assessed their self-reported attitudes towards promoting health, experiences of and perceived competence and confidence to promote health, and perceptions of their school's health promotion culture and environment. The curriculum consisted of a Health Day with workshops and subsequent school-based tasks, delivered via a multiagency approach. Results are reported as the percentage of all people who responded to a particular question.

Findings: the response rate was 11% (n=104). Positive attitudes towards promoting health were reported by 88 (96·7%) of 91 teachers. 50 (74·6%) of 67 teachers felt that the training had positively influenced their health education teaching. Between 57·3% (55/96) and 87·5% (84/96) felt confident and skilled in teaching ten health-related topics (median 71·9%). The teachers most frequently reported that their life experience (87/95, 91·6%), practical teaching experience (75/94, 79·8%), and support received in school since qualifying (65/93, 69·9%) had been influential in their gaining competence. However, 80 (81·6%) of 98 teachers agreed with the statement that “academic attainment is prioritised over other elements of pupils’ education” in their school.

Interpretation: the low response rate creates possible participation bias and generalisability issues. However, the high proportions of these teachers reporting positive attitudes towards and feeling confident and competent in promoting health suggest a possible longer term positive effect of the training. The findings indicate that teachers value support from colleagues, and practical and life experience for developing competence, but feel that health education is not always prioritised. The Southampton training model could be used by other initial teacher education institutions. Our findings do not indicate, however, how such training could ultimately affect pupils’ health and education outcomes.

Funding: The Leverhulme Trust

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 13 November 2015
Keywords: teacher training, health and well-being, children and young people, health education, personal, social, health and economic education, pshe
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences, Mathematics, Science & Health Education

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 384078
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/384078
ISSN: 0140-6736
PURE UUID: f259d6c9-2cc0-48c3-8bdf-cd1c62257730
ORCID for Karen Pickett: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8631-6465
ORCID for Jenny Byrne: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6969-5539
ORCID for Jonathan Shepherd: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1682-4330
ORCID for Paul Roderick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9475-6850
ORCID for Marcus Grace: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1949-1765

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Dec 2015 10:23
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:20

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Karen Pickett ORCID iD
Author: Jenny Byrne ORCID iD
Author: Willeke Rietdijk
Author: Paul Roderick ORCID iD
Author: Marcus Grace ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×