The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Implementation science: a reappraisal of our journal mission and scope

Implementation science: a reappraisal of our journal mission and scope
Implementation science: a reappraisal of our journal mission and scope
The implementation of research findings into healthcare practice has become increasingly recognised as a major priority for researchers, service providers, research funders and policymakers over the past decade. Nine years after its establishment, Implementation Science, an international online open access journal, currently publishes over 150 articles each year. This is fewer than 30% of those submitted for publication. The majority of manuscript rejections occur at the point of initial editorial screening, frequently because we judge them to fall outside of journal scope. There are a number of common reasons as to why manuscripts are rejected on grounds of scope. Furthermore, as the field of implementation research has evolved and our journal submissions have risen, we have, out of necessity, had to become more selective in what we publish. We have also expanded our scope, particularly around patient-mediated and population health interventions, and will monitor the impact of such changes. We hope this editorial on our evolving priorities and common reasons for rejection without peer review will help authors to better judge the relevance of their papers to Implementation Science
implementation research, methodology
1-7
Foy, Robbie
1d8d5d63-1e0c-4b0e-a3d2-4145f6f4f926
Sales, Anne
c356dd91-c5f4-4105-99b8-4209f2ec6f63
Wensing, Michel
8702046c-6c87-404a-81a7-fcfcdebfb9cc
Aarons, Gregory A.
cbc39d2e-7fb1-405b-979e-9737f8c3afab
Flottorp, Signe
f8a3d4c7-521a-4a6c-98e3-4ba17840d9ca
Kent, Bridie
9a16161a-c0a4-4a2d-a1da-47ab54241c34
Michie, Susan
47e0a907-79cb-47d5-b5a9-82d2afe1747a
O’Connor, Denise
04103c70-2e48-46f1-ac0f-bc6cf4c4bfad
Rogers, Anne
105eeebc-1899-4850-950e-385a51738eb7
Sevdalis, Nick
0910262b-1085-41fa-931c-40b643912854
Straus, Sharon
05a18081-a806-4fa9-ab48-0f49f232f329
Wilson, Paul
8240bb8b-42b2-4822-8c8b-33e12687403b
Foy, Robbie
1d8d5d63-1e0c-4b0e-a3d2-4145f6f4f926
Sales, Anne
c356dd91-c5f4-4105-99b8-4209f2ec6f63
Wensing, Michel
8702046c-6c87-404a-81a7-fcfcdebfb9cc
Aarons, Gregory A.
cbc39d2e-7fb1-405b-979e-9737f8c3afab
Flottorp, Signe
f8a3d4c7-521a-4a6c-98e3-4ba17840d9ca
Kent, Bridie
9a16161a-c0a4-4a2d-a1da-47ab54241c34
Michie, Susan
47e0a907-79cb-47d5-b5a9-82d2afe1747a
O’Connor, Denise
04103c70-2e48-46f1-ac0f-bc6cf4c4bfad
Rogers, Anne
105eeebc-1899-4850-950e-385a51738eb7
Sevdalis, Nick
0910262b-1085-41fa-931c-40b643912854
Straus, Sharon
05a18081-a806-4fa9-ab48-0f49f232f329
Wilson, Paul
8240bb8b-42b2-4822-8c8b-33e12687403b

Foy, Robbie, Sales, Anne, Wensing, Michel, Aarons, Gregory A., Flottorp, Signe, Kent, Bridie, Michie, Susan, O’Connor, Denise, Rogers, Anne, Sevdalis, Nick, Straus, Sharon and Wilson, Paul (2015) Implementation science: a reappraisal of our journal mission and scope. Implementation Science, 10 (1), 1-7. (doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0240-2).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The implementation of research findings into healthcare practice has become increasingly recognised as a major priority for researchers, service providers, research funders and policymakers over the past decade. Nine years after its establishment, Implementation Science, an international online open access journal, currently publishes over 150 articles each year. This is fewer than 30% of those submitted for publication. The majority of manuscript rejections occur at the point of initial editorial screening, frequently because we judge them to fall outside of journal scope. There are a number of common reasons as to why manuscripts are rejected on grounds of scope. Furthermore, as the field of implementation research has evolved and our journal submissions have risen, we have, out of necessity, had to become more selective in what we publish. We have also expanded our scope, particularly around patient-mediated and population health interventions, and will monitor the impact of such changes. We hope this editorial on our evolving priorities and common reasons for rejection without peer review will help authors to better judge the relevance of their papers to Implementation Science

Text
Implementation science - a reappraisal of our journal mission and scope.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (385kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 30 March 2015
Published date: 17 April 2015
Keywords: implementation research, methodology
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 384341
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/384341
PURE UUID: b66a7ffb-7f37-44dc-9567-59726ff2e4b4

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Dec 2015 12:01
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 21:57

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Robbie Foy
Author: Anne Sales
Author: Michel Wensing
Author: Gregory A. Aarons
Author: Signe Flottorp
Author: Bridie Kent
Author: Susan Michie
Author: Denise O’Connor
Author: Anne Rogers
Author: Nick Sevdalis
Author: Sharon Straus
Author: Paul Wilson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×