The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Integrating Landsat pixel composites and change metrics with lidar plots to predictively map forest structure and aboveground biomass in Saskatchewan, Canada

Integrating Landsat pixel composites and change metrics with lidar plots to predictively map forest structure and aboveground biomass in Saskatchewan, Canada
Integrating Landsat pixel composites and change metrics with lidar plots to predictively map forest structure and aboveground biomass in Saskatchewan, Canada
Forest inventory and monitoring programs are needed to provide timely, spatially complete (i.e. mapped), and verifiable information to support forest management, policy formulation, and reporting obligations. Satellite images, in particular data from the Landsat Thematic Mapper and Enhanced Thematic Mapper (TM/ETM +) sensors, are often integrated with field plots from forest inventory programs, leveraging the complete spatial coverage of imagery with detailed ecological information from a sample of plots to spatially model forest conditions and resources. However, in remote and unmanaged areas such as Canada's northern forests, financial and logistic constraints can severely limit the availability of inventory plot data. Additionally, Landsat spectral information has known limitations for characterizing vertical vegetation structure and biomass; while clouds, snow, and short growing seasons can limit development of large area image mosaics that are spectrally and phenologically consistent across space and time. In this study we predict and map forest structure and aboveground biomass over 37 million ha of forestland in Saskatchewan, Canada. We utilize lidar plots—observations of forest structure collected from airborne discrete-return lidar transects acquired in 2010—as a surrogate for traditional field and photo plots. Mapped explanatory data included Tasseled Cap indices and multi-temporal change metrics derived from Landsat TM/ETM + pixel-based image composites. Maps of forest structure and total aboveground biomass were created using a Random Forest (RF) implementation of Nearest Neighbor (NN) imputation. The imputation model had moderate to high plot-level accuracy across all forest attributes (R2 values of 0.42–0.69), as well as reasonable attribute predictions and error estimates (for example, canopy cover above 2 m on validation plots averaged 35.77%, with an RMSE of 13.45%, while unsystematic and systematic agreement coefficients (ACuns and ACsys) had values of 0.63 and 0.97 respectively). Additionally, forest attributes displayed consistent trends in relation to the time since and magnitude of wildfires, indicating model predictions captured the dominant ecological patterns and processes in these forests. Acknowledging methodological and conceptual challenges based upon the use of lidar plots from transects, this study demonstrates that using lidar plots and pixel compositing in imputation mapping can provide forest inventory and monitoring information for regions lacking ongoing or up-to-date field data collection programs.
lidar, landsat, pixel composites, change metrics, random forest, imputation
0034-4257
188-201
Zald, H.
1d4abfcb-1f92-4bbc-8113-97094db9a68a
Wulder, M.A.
e9b0e7a1-494e-40cf-a1e5-20f487f6c6ff
White, J.C.
2a3dffea-5fa9-4065-9e4d-34b7abafa1a0
Hilker, T.
c7fb75b8-320d-49df-84ba-96c9ee523d40
Hermosilla, T.
3e16db4f-a80e-4488-8a47-86315c0b5a44
Hobart, G.W.
eab746a9-d869-4c6f-8334-bce636245b44
Coops, N.C.
b10725db-8b4c-4338-92b8-ead49cebc80e
Zald, H.
1d4abfcb-1f92-4bbc-8113-97094db9a68a
Wulder, M.A.
e9b0e7a1-494e-40cf-a1e5-20f487f6c6ff
White, J.C.
2a3dffea-5fa9-4065-9e4d-34b7abafa1a0
Hilker, T.
c7fb75b8-320d-49df-84ba-96c9ee523d40
Hermosilla, T.
3e16db4f-a80e-4488-8a47-86315c0b5a44
Hobart, G.W.
eab746a9-d869-4c6f-8334-bce636245b44
Coops, N.C.
b10725db-8b4c-4338-92b8-ead49cebc80e

Zald, H., Wulder, M.A., White, J.C., Hilker, T., Hermosilla, T., Hobart, G.W. and Coops, N.C. (2016) Integrating Landsat pixel composites and change metrics with lidar plots to predictively map forest structure and aboveground biomass in Saskatchewan, Canada. Remote Sensing of Environment, 176, 188-201. (doi:10.1016/j.rse.2016.01.015).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Forest inventory and monitoring programs are needed to provide timely, spatially complete (i.e. mapped), and verifiable information to support forest management, policy formulation, and reporting obligations. Satellite images, in particular data from the Landsat Thematic Mapper and Enhanced Thematic Mapper (TM/ETM +) sensors, are often integrated with field plots from forest inventory programs, leveraging the complete spatial coverage of imagery with detailed ecological information from a sample of plots to spatially model forest conditions and resources. However, in remote and unmanaged areas such as Canada's northern forests, financial and logistic constraints can severely limit the availability of inventory plot data. Additionally, Landsat spectral information has known limitations for characterizing vertical vegetation structure and biomass; while clouds, snow, and short growing seasons can limit development of large area image mosaics that are spectrally and phenologically consistent across space and time. In this study we predict and map forest structure and aboveground biomass over 37 million ha of forestland in Saskatchewan, Canada. We utilize lidar plots—observations of forest structure collected from airborne discrete-return lidar transects acquired in 2010—as a surrogate for traditional field and photo plots. Mapped explanatory data included Tasseled Cap indices and multi-temporal change metrics derived from Landsat TM/ETM + pixel-based image composites. Maps of forest structure and total aboveground biomass were created using a Random Forest (RF) implementation of Nearest Neighbor (NN) imputation. The imputation model had moderate to high plot-level accuracy across all forest attributes (R2 values of 0.42–0.69), as well as reasonable attribute predictions and error estimates (for example, canopy cover above 2 m on validation plots averaged 35.77%, with an RMSE of 13.45%, while unsystematic and systematic agreement coefficients (ACuns and ACsys) had values of 0.63 and 0.97 respectively). Additionally, forest attributes displayed consistent trends in relation to the time since and magnitude of wildfires, indicating model predictions captured the dominant ecological patterns and processes in these forests. Acknowledging methodological and conceptual challenges based upon the use of lidar plots from transects, this study demonstrates that using lidar plots and pixel compositing in imputation mapping can provide forest inventory and monitoring information for regions lacking ongoing or up-to-date field data collection programs.

Text
1-s2.0-S0034425716300165-main.pdf - Version of Record
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 January 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 February 2016
Published date: April 2016
Keywords: lidar, landsat, pixel composites, change metrics, random forest, imputation
Organisations: Earth Surface Dynamics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 384661
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/384661
ISSN: 0034-4257
PURE UUID: fa0eac13-82d9-40a9-a455-03afeab28d2f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Apr 2016 08:05
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 22:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: H. Zald
Author: M.A. Wulder
Author: J.C. White
Author: T. Hilker
Author: T. Hermosilla
Author: G.W. Hobart
Author: N.C. Coops

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×