Un-learning and criticality in intercultural education
Un-learning and criticality in intercultural education
This chapter engages with the question what critical thinking in intercultural education is, as well as what it is not, i.e. what constitutes uncritical thinking. I depart from the assumption that intercultural learning takes place at the boundaries between what we know and what we do not know: the experiences not yet lived, the perspectives not yet understood, as well as the discourses and other semiotic resources not yet encountered or appropriated. Intercultural learning as an engagement with difference is hence as much about learning as it is about un-learning and while criticality is important for the former, it is fundamental for the latter. In order to explore the notion of criticality in the context of un-learning, I draw upon most recent discussions (Sayer 2010 and 2011, Grenfell et al. 2011) about Bourdieu’s (1984) notion of ‘habitus’ and ‘field’. ‘Habitus’ captures the embodied nature and largely out-of-awareness dispositions that people acquire through years of socialization in specific ‘fields’, i.e. structured spaces with specific roles and relations
Zotzmann, Karin
83cb3ab3-c9cd-43c5-946e-cc48462ac234
Zotzmann, Karin
83cb3ab3-c9cd-43c5-946e-cc48462ac234
Zotzmann, Karin
(2018)
Un-learning and criticality in intercultural education.
In,
Dervin, Fred and Byrd Clark, Junie
(eds.)
Critical Thinking in Multilingual and Intercultural Education.
Info Age Publishing.
(In Press)
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
This chapter engages with the question what critical thinking in intercultural education is, as well as what it is not, i.e. what constitutes uncritical thinking. I depart from the assumption that intercultural learning takes place at the boundaries between what we know and what we do not know: the experiences not yet lived, the perspectives not yet understood, as well as the discourses and other semiotic resources not yet encountered or appropriated. Intercultural learning as an engagement with difference is hence as much about learning as it is about un-learning and while criticality is important for the former, it is fundamental for the latter. In order to explore the notion of criticality in the context of un-learning, I draw upon most recent discussions (Sayer 2010 and 2011, Grenfell et al. 2011) about Bourdieu’s (1984) notion of ‘habitus’ and ‘field’. ‘Habitus’ captures the embodied nature and largely out-of-awareness dispositions that people acquire through years of socialization in specific ‘fields’, i.e. structured spaces with specific roles and relations
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2018
Organisations:
Modern Languages
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 385371
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/385371
PURE UUID: 4daf7f94-dc9d-4dcb-a847-b66da657d4e2
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Jan 2016 14:33
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 08:29
Export record
Contributors
Editor:
Fred Dervin
Editor:
Junie Byrd Clark
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics