Is single room hospital accommodation associated with differences in health care associated infection, falls, pressure ulcers or medication errors? A natural experiment with non-equivalent controls
Is single room hospital accommodation associated with differences in health care associated infection, falls, pressure ulcers or medication errors? A natural experiment with non-equivalent controls
Objectives: A wide range of patient benefits have been attributed to single room hospital accommodation including a reduction in adverse patient safety events. However, studies have been limited to the US with limited evidence from elsewhere. The aim of this study was to assess the impact on safety outcomes of the move to a newly built all single room acute hospital.
Methods: A natural experiment investigating the move to 100% single room accommodation in acute assessment, surgical and older people’s wards. Move to 100% single room accommodation compared to ‘steady state’ and ‘new build’ control hospitals. Falls, pressure ulcer, medication error, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile rates from routine data sources were measured over 36 months.
Results: Five of 15 time series in the wards that moved to single room accommodation revealed changes that coincided with the move to the new all single room hospital: specifically, increased fall, pressure ulcer and Clostridium difficile rates in the older people’s ward, and temporary increases in falls and medication errors in the acute assessment unit. However, because the case mix of the older people’s ward changed, and because the increase in falls and medication errors on the acute assessment ward did not last longer than six months, no clear effect of single rooms on the safety outcomes was demonstrated. There were no changes to safety events coinciding with the move at the new build control site.
Conclusion: For all changes in patient safety events that coincided with the move to single rooms, we found plausible alternative explanations such as case-mix change or disruption as a result of the re-organization of services after the move. The results provide no evidence of either benefit or harm from all single room accommodation in terms of safety-related outcomes, although there may be short-term risks associated with a move to single rooms.
health facility moving, hospitals, patient safety, quality of health care
147-155
Simon, Michael
40c7fa62-277a-469d-993e-6be6c6714896
Maben, Jill
3240b527-420c-498e-9f66-557b96561f40
Murrells, Trevor
9a57589a-d893-415c-8c3d-8b25d052f42c
Griffiths, Peter
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b
July 2016
Simon, Michael
40c7fa62-277a-469d-993e-6be6c6714896
Maben, Jill
3240b527-420c-498e-9f66-557b96561f40
Murrells, Trevor
9a57589a-d893-415c-8c3d-8b25d052f42c
Griffiths, Peter
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b
Simon, Michael, Maben, Jill, Murrells, Trevor and Griffiths, Peter
(2016)
Is single room hospital accommodation associated with differences in health care associated infection, falls, pressure ulcers or medication errors? A natural experiment with non-equivalent controls.
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 21 (3), .
(doi:10.1177/1355819615625700).
(PMID:26811373)
Abstract
Objectives: A wide range of patient benefits have been attributed to single room hospital accommodation including a reduction in adverse patient safety events. However, studies have been limited to the US with limited evidence from elsewhere. The aim of this study was to assess the impact on safety outcomes of the move to a newly built all single room acute hospital.
Methods: A natural experiment investigating the move to 100% single room accommodation in acute assessment, surgical and older people’s wards. Move to 100% single room accommodation compared to ‘steady state’ and ‘new build’ control hospitals. Falls, pressure ulcer, medication error, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile rates from routine data sources were measured over 36 months.
Results: Five of 15 time series in the wards that moved to single room accommodation revealed changes that coincided with the move to the new all single room hospital: specifically, increased fall, pressure ulcer and Clostridium difficile rates in the older people’s ward, and temporary increases in falls and medication errors in the acute assessment unit. However, because the case mix of the older people’s ward changed, and because the increase in falls and medication errors on the acute assessment ward did not last longer than six months, no clear effect of single rooms on the safety outcomes was demonstrated. There were no changes to safety events coinciding with the move at the new build control site.
Conclusion: For all changes in patient safety events that coincided with the move to single rooms, we found plausible alternative explanations such as case-mix change or disruption as a result of the re-organization of services after the move. The results provide no evidence of either benefit or harm from all single room accommodation in terms of safety-related outcomes, although there may be short-term risks associated with a move to single rooms.
Text
Simon-SingleRoomRoutineData-REMS.doc
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
Published Article Is single Room Hospital Accommodation Associated with differences in.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 18 November 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 24 January 2016
Published date: July 2016
Keywords:
health facility moving, hospitals, patient safety, quality of health care
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 386033
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/386033
PURE UUID: fbcbe474-c6d7-4983-8f93-b892432d3ed9
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 27 Jan 2016 14:39
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:37
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Michael Simon
Author:
Jill Maben
Author:
Trevor Murrells
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics