The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Is single room hospital accommodation associated with differences in health care associated infection, falls, pressure ulcers or medication errors? A natural experiment with non-equivalent controls

Is single room hospital accommodation associated with differences in health care associated infection, falls, pressure ulcers or medication errors? A natural experiment with non-equivalent controls
Is single room hospital accommodation associated with differences in health care associated infection, falls, pressure ulcers or medication errors? A natural experiment with non-equivalent controls
Objectives: A wide range of patient benefits have been attributed to single room hospital accommodation including a reduction in adverse patient safety events. However, studies have been limited to the US with limited evidence from elsewhere. The aim of this study was to assess the impact on safety outcomes of the move to a newly built all single room acute hospital.

Methods: A natural experiment investigating the move to 100% single room accommodation in acute assessment, surgical and older people’s wards. Move to 100% single room accommodation compared to ‘steady state’ and ‘new build’ control hospitals. Falls, pressure ulcer, medication error, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile rates from routine data sources were measured over 36 months.

Results: Five of 15 time series in the wards that moved to single room accommodation revealed changes that coincided with the move to the new all single room hospital: specifically, increased fall, pressure ulcer and Clostridium difficile rates in the older people’s ward, and temporary increases in falls and medication errors in the acute assessment unit. However, because the case mix of the older people’s ward changed, and because the increase in falls and medication errors on the acute assessment ward did not last longer than six months, no clear effect of single rooms on the safety outcomes was demonstrated. There were no changes to safety events coinciding with the move at the new build control site.

Conclusion: For all changes in patient safety events that coincided with the move to single rooms, we found plausible alternative explanations such as case-mix change or disruption as a result of the re-organization of services after the move. The results provide no evidence of either benefit or harm from all single room accommodation in terms of safety-related outcomes, although there may be short-term risks associated with a move to single rooms.
health facility moving, hospitals, patient safety, quality of health care
147-155
Simon, Michael
40c7fa62-277a-469d-993e-6be6c6714896
Maben, Jill
3240b527-420c-498e-9f66-557b96561f40
Murrells, Trevor
9a57589a-d893-415c-8c3d-8b25d052f42c
Griffiths, Peter
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b
Simon, Michael
40c7fa62-277a-469d-993e-6be6c6714896
Maben, Jill
3240b527-420c-498e-9f66-557b96561f40
Murrells, Trevor
9a57589a-d893-415c-8c3d-8b25d052f42c
Griffiths, Peter
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b

Simon, Michael, Maben, Jill, Murrells, Trevor and Griffiths, Peter (2016) Is single room hospital accommodation associated with differences in health care associated infection, falls, pressure ulcers or medication errors? A natural experiment with non-equivalent controls. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 21 (3), 147-155. (doi:10.1177/1355819615625700). (PMID:26811373)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: A wide range of patient benefits have been attributed to single room hospital accommodation including a reduction in adverse patient safety events. However, studies have been limited to the US with limited evidence from elsewhere. The aim of this study was to assess the impact on safety outcomes of the move to a newly built all single room acute hospital.

Methods: A natural experiment investigating the move to 100% single room accommodation in acute assessment, surgical and older people’s wards. Move to 100% single room accommodation compared to ‘steady state’ and ‘new build’ control hospitals. Falls, pressure ulcer, medication error, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile rates from routine data sources were measured over 36 months.

Results: Five of 15 time series in the wards that moved to single room accommodation revealed changes that coincided with the move to the new all single room hospital: specifically, increased fall, pressure ulcer and Clostridium difficile rates in the older people’s ward, and temporary increases in falls and medication errors in the acute assessment unit. However, because the case mix of the older people’s ward changed, and because the increase in falls and medication errors on the acute assessment ward did not last longer than six months, no clear effect of single rooms on the safety outcomes was demonstrated. There were no changes to safety events coinciding with the move at the new build control site.

Conclusion: For all changes in patient safety events that coincided with the move to single rooms, we found plausible alternative explanations such as case-mix change or disruption as a result of the re-organization of services after the move. The results provide no evidence of either benefit or harm from all single room accommodation in terms of safety-related outcomes, although there may be short-term risks associated with a move to single rooms.

Text
Simon-SingleRoomRoutineData-REMS.doc - Accepted Manuscript
Download (119kB)
Text
Published Article Is single Room Hospital Accommodation Associated with differences in.pdf - Version of Record
Download (614kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 18 November 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 24 January 2016
Published date: July 2016
Keywords: health facility moving, hospitals, patient safety, quality of health care
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 386033
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/386033
PURE UUID: fbcbe474-c6d7-4983-8f93-b892432d3ed9
ORCID for Peter Griffiths: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2439-2857

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Jan 2016 14:39
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Michael Simon
Author: Jill Maben
Author: Trevor Murrells
Author: Peter Griffiths ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×