The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Trans-dimensional Bayesian inversion of controlled-source electromagnetic data in the German North Sea

Trans-dimensional Bayesian inversion of controlled-source electromagnetic data in the German North Sea
Trans-dimensional Bayesian inversion of controlled-source electromagnetic data in the German North Sea
This paper presents the first controlled-source electromagnetic survey carried out in the German North Sea with a recently developed seafloor-towed electrical dipole–dipole system, i.e., HYDRA II. Controlled-source electromagnetic data are measured, processed, and inverted in the time domain to estimate an electrical resistivity model of the sub-seafloor. The controlled-source electromagnetic survey targeted a shallow, phase-reversed, seismic reflector, which potentially indicates free gas. To compare the resistivity model to reflection seismic data and draw a combined interpretation, we apply a trans-dimensional Bayesian inversion that estimates model parameters and uncertainties, and samples probabilistically over the number of layers of the resistivity model. The controlled-source electromagnetic data errors show time-varying correlations, and we therefore apply a non-Toeplitz data covariance matrix in the inversion that is estimated from residual analysis. The geological interpretation drawn from controlled-source electromagnetic inversion results and borehole and reflection seismic data yield resistivities of ?1 ?m at the seafloor, which are typical for fine-grained marine deposits, whereas resistivities below ?20 mbsf increase to 2–4 ?m and can be related to a transition from fine-grained (Holocene age) to unsorted, coarse-grained, and compacted glacial sediments (Pleistocene age). Interface depths from controlled-source electromagnetic inversion generally match the seismic reflector related to the contrast between the different depositional environments. Resistivities decrease again at greater depths to ?1 ?m with a minimum resistivity at ?300 mbsf where a seismic reflector (that marks a major flooding surface of late Miocene age) correlates with an increased gamma-ray count, indicating an increased amount of fine-grained sediments. We suggest that the grain size may have a major impact on the electrical resistivity of the sediment with lower resistivities for fine-grained sediments. Concerning the phase-reversed seismic reflector that was targeted by the survey, controlled-source electromagnetic inversion results yield no indication for free gas below it as resistivities are generally elevated above the reflector. We suggest that the elevated resistivities are caused by an overall decrease in porosity in the glacial sediments and that the seismic reflector could be caused by an impedance contrast at a thin low-velocity layer. Controlled-source electromagnetic interface depths near the reflector are quite uncertain and variable. We conclude that the seismic interface cannot be resolved with the controlled-source electromagnetic data, but the thickness of the corresponding resistive layer follows the trend of the reflector that is inclined towards the west.
0016-8025
1314-1333
Gehrmann, Romina A.S.
1ee547b2-aa53-4d38-9d36-a2ccc3aa52e2
Dettmer, Jan
80073ff8-2dca-4bf4-ab59-65d17296d637
Schwalenberg, Katrin
2d6f4b27-eb47-4c1c-9b26-11ae3dfbf6dc
Engels, Martin
7da68be4-0918-41b6-88ed-23b86bbad308
Dosso, Stan E.
ed7785b7-0513-4660-b6bc-6eee51d84179
Özmaral, Asli
a4b3a6fd-9cd0-481f-90d6-b84e07d27eb0
Gehrmann, Romina A.S.
1ee547b2-aa53-4d38-9d36-a2ccc3aa52e2
Dettmer, Jan
80073ff8-2dca-4bf4-ab59-65d17296d637
Schwalenberg, Katrin
2d6f4b27-eb47-4c1c-9b26-11ae3dfbf6dc
Engels, Martin
7da68be4-0918-41b6-88ed-23b86bbad308
Dosso, Stan E.
ed7785b7-0513-4660-b6bc-6eee51d84179
Özmaral, Asli
a4b3a6fd-9cd0-481f-90d6-b84e07d27eb0

Gehrmann, Romina A.S., Dettmer, Jan, Schwalenberg, Katrin, Engels, Martin, Dosso, Stan E. and Özmaral, Asli (2015) Trans-dimensional Bayesian inversion of controlled-source electromagnetic data in the German North Sea. Geophysical Prospecting, 63 (6), 1314-1333. (doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12308).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper presents the first controlled-source electromagnetic survey carried out in the German North Sea with a recently developed seafloor-towed electrical dipole–dipole system, i.e., HYDRA II. Controlled-source electromagnetic data are measured, processed, and inverted in the time domain to estimate an electrical resistivity model of the sub-seafloor. The controlled-source electromagnetic survey targeted a shallow, phase-reversed, seismic reflector, which potentially indicates free gas. To compare the resistivity model to reflection seismic data and draw a combined interpretation, we apply a trans-dimensional Bayesian inversion that estimates model parameters and uncertainties, and samples probabilistically over the number of layers of the resistivity model. The controlled-source electromagnetic data errors show time-varying correlations, and we therefore apply a non-Toeplitz data covariance matrix in the inversion that is estimated from residual analysis. The geological interpretation drawn from controlled-source electromagnetic inversion results and borehole and reflection seismic data yield resistivities of ?1 ?m at the seafloor, which are typical for fine-grained marine deposits, whereas resistivities below ?20 mbsf increase to 2–4 ?m and can be related to a transition from fine-grained (Holocene age) to unsorted, coarse-grained, and compacted glacial sediments (Pleistocene age). Interface depths from controlled-source electromagnetic inversion generally match the seismic reflector related to the contrast between the different depositional environments. Resistivities decrease again at greater depths to ?1 ?m with a minimum resistivity at ?300 mbsf where a seismic reflector (that marks a major flooding surface of late Miocene age) correlates with an increased gamma-ray count, indicating an increased amount of fine-grained sediments. We suggest that the grain size may have a major impact on the electrical resistivity of the sediment with lower resistivities for fine-grained sediments. Concerning the phase-reversed seismic reflector that was targeted by the survey, controlled-source electromagnetic inversion results yield no indication for free gas below it as resistivities are generally elevated above the reflector. We suggest that the elevated resistivities are caused by an overall decrease in porosity in the glacial sediments and that the seismic reflector could be caused by an impedance contrast at a thin low-velocity layer. Controlled-source electromagnetic interface depths near the reflector are quite uncertain and variable. We conclude that the seismic interface cannot be resolved with the controlled-source electromagnetic data, but the thickness of the corresponding resistive layer follows the trend of the reflector that is inclined towards the west.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: November 2015
Organisations: Geology & Geophysics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 386355
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/386355
ISSN: 0016-8025
PURE UUID: ef135051-0766-4ce1-afbf-15d0d33e5d3a
ORCID for Romina A.S. Gehrmann: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3099-2771

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Jan 2016 16:39
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 22:30

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Romina A.S. Gehrmann ORCID iD
Author: Jan Dettmer
Author: Katrin Schwalenberg
Author: Martin Engels
Author: Stan E. Dosso
Author: Asli Özmaral

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×