The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Listening laboratory study of low height roadside noise barrier performance compared against in-situ field data

Listening laboratory study of low height roadside noise barrier performance compared against in-situ field data
Listening laboratory study of low height roadside noise barrier performance compared against in-situ field data
A listening laboratory study conducted using simulated soundfields with and without a low (1 m) height roadside noise barrier suggested that small but significant improvements in the perceived or subjective soundscape could be achieved. The laboratory study closely replicated the acoustic conditions observed in an earlier in-situ field study (Rådsten-Ekman et al. [18]) which had also found similar improvements in subjective impressions. Comparing the two sets of data suggested that the modest acoustical performance of the low height road traffic noise barrier was sufficient to explain the observed subjective differences. In the laboratory study, reported loudness and annoyance were reduced by up to 25% and reported calmness was increased by up to 43%. In the laboratory study, there was no indication that the increased relative importance of low frequency content within the overall frequency spectrum behind the noise barrier had any material effect on the results.
noise barrier, perceptual assessment, acoustical performance, spectral attenuation, sound environment
0360-1323
216-225
Torija, Antonio J.
6dd0d982-fcd6-42b6-9148-211175fd3287
Flindell, Ian
92801193-de59-4b33-af0a-e1a13a77a055
Torija, Antonio J.
6dd0d982-fcd6-42b6-9148-211175fd3287
Flindell, Ian
92801193-de59-4b33-af0a-e1a13a77a055

Torija, Antonio J. and Flindell, Ian (2014) Listening laboratory study of low height roadside noise barrier performance compared against in-situ field data. Building and Environment, 81, 216-225. (doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.07.006).

Record type: Article

Abstract

A listening laboratory study conducted using simulated soundfields with and without a low (1 m) height roadside noise barrier suggested that small but significant improvements in the perceived or subjective soundscape could be achieved. The laboratory study closely replicated the acoustic conditions observed in an earlier in-situ field study (Rådsten-Ekman et al. [18]) which had also found similar improvements in subjective impressions. Comparing the two sets of data suggested that the modest acoustical performance of the low height road traffic noise barrier was sufficient to explain the observed subjective differences. In the laboratory study, reported loudness and annoyance were reduced by up to 25% and reported calmness was increased by up to 43%. In the laboratory study, there was no indication that the increased relative importance of low frequency content within the overall frequency spectrum behind the noise barrier had any material effect on the results.

Text
Torija_Flindell_BAE_2014.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 July 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 10 July 2014
Published date: November 2014
Keywords: noise barrier, perceptual assessment, acoustical performance, spectral attenuation, sound environment
Organisations: Acoustics Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 386678
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/386678
ISSN: 0360-1323
PURE UUID: 830e2cad-217b-42fe-bcaa-65c53f692648
ORCID for Antonio J. Torija: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5915-3736

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Feb 2016 11:54
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 22:35

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Antonio J. Torija ORCID iD
Author: Ian Flindell

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×