The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A multicentre study of the evidence for customized margins in photon breast boost radiotherapy

A multicentre study of the evidence for customized margins in photon breast boost radiotherapy
A multicentre study of the evidence for customized margins in photon breast boost radiotherapy
Objective:To determine if subsets of patients may benefit from smaller or larger margins when using laser setup and bony anatomy verification of breast tumour bed (TB) boost radiotherapy (RT).

Methods: Verification imaging data acquired using cone-beam CT, megavoltage CT or two-dimensional kilovoltage imaging on 218 patients were used (1574 images). TB setup errors for laser-only setup (dlaser) and for bony anatomy verification (dbone) were determined using clips implanted into the TB as a gold standard for the TB position. Cases were grouped by centre-, patient- and treatment-related factors, including breast volume, TB position, seroma visibility and surgical technique. Systematic (?) and random (?) TB setup errors were compared between groups, and TB planning target volume margins (MTB) were calculated.

Results: For the study population, ?laser was between 2.8 and 3.4?mm, and ?bone was between 2.2 and 2.6?mm, respectively. Females with larger breasts (p?=?0.03), easily visible seroma (p???0.02) and open surgical technique (p???0.04) had larger ?laser. ?bone was larger for females with larger breasts (p?=?0.02) and lateral tumours (p?=?0.04). Females with medial tumours (p?<?0.01) had smaller ?bone.

Conclusion:If clips are not used, margins should be 8 and 10?mm for bony anatomy verification and laser setup, respectively. Individualization of TB margins may be considered based on breast volume, TB and seroma visibility.

Advances in knowledge:Setup accuracy using lasers and bony anatomy is influenced by patient and treatment factors. Some patients may benefit from clip-based image guidance more than others.
0007-1285
1-9
Harris, Emma J.
a7eb4cff-a6a3-47c7-a10f-de9288890a27
Mukesh, Mukesh B.
cd3d9c57-9455-44e7-9fb3-10d5eb3e9da7
Donovan, Ellen M.
34ca2855-1873-4324-a76f-e883a6a51647
Kirby, Anna M.
18e149ce-178f-4671-9e17-bca9b017ae6e
Haviland, Joanne S.
569aa43b-15bd-4e9d-b4a5-e68a84334cfe
Jena, Raj
03009c98-6680-4bf4-b8ac-71a78345ff32
Yarnold, John
16e929ca-7e4b-41b4-967c-2ead0e634ca1
Baker, Angela
066caa21-cc3a-4be5-9809-79bfdb806a92
Dean, June
f59c9159-30f5-478a-a268-a12cd5195b6d
Eagle, Sally
4afa7617-617e-4246-8e57-d608d3b31a84
Mayles, Helen
0bd54bfa-f610-448c-99b3-571e77115270
Griffin, Claire
3794177e-ead6-4563-87e6-67489eac06c8
Perry, Rosalind
a38b2e52-f3fa-4b30-a8ac-98f22714ddcc
Poynter, Andrew
5a2527e9-79d8-413f-9b99-463fd3cb7c2c
Coles, Charlotte E.
a57ae239-eac4-496f-96f4-367ad6f35350
Evans, Philip M.
0e96781e-fbd3-4253-9c74-660e16079759
Harris, Emma J.
a7eb4cff-a6a3-47c7-a10f-de9288890a27
Mukesh, Mukesh B.
cd3d9c57-9455-44e7-9fb3-10d5eb3e9da7
Donovan, Ellen M.
34ca2855-1873-4324-a76f-e883a6a51647
Kirby, Anna M.
18e149ce-178f-4671-9e17-bca9b017ae6e
Haviland, Joanne S.
569aa43b-15bd-4e9d-b4a5-e68a84334cfe
Jena, Raj
03009c98-6680-4bf4-b8ac-71a78345ff32
Yarnold, John
16e929ca-7e4b-41b4-967c-2ead0e634ca1
Baker, Angela
066caa21-cc3a-4be5-9809-79bfdb806a92
Dean, June
f59c9159-30f5-478a-a268-a12cd5195b6d
Eagle, Sally
4afa7617-617e-4246-8e57-d608d3b31a84
Mayles, Helen
0bd54bfa-f610-448c-99b3-571e77115270
Griffin, Claire
3794177e-ead6-4563-87e6-67489eac06c8
Perry, Rosalind
a38b2e52-f3fa-4b30-a8ac-98f22714ddcc
Poynter, Andrew
5a2527e9-79d8-413f-9b99-463fd3cb7c2c
Coles, Charlotte E.
a57ae239-eac4-496f-96f4-367ad6f35350
Evans, Philip M.
0e96781e-fbd3-4253-9c74-660e16079759

Harris, Emma J., Mukesh, Mukesh B., Donovan, Ellen M., Kirby, Anna M., Haviland, Joanne S., Jena, Raj, Yarnold, John, Baker, Angela, Dean, June, Eagle, Sally, Mayles, Helen, Griffin, Claire, Perry, Rosalind, Poynter, Andrew, Coles, Charlotte E. and Evans, Philip M. (2016) A multicentre study of the evidence for customized margins in photon breast boost radiotherapy. British Journal of Radiology, 89 (1058), 1-9. (doi:10.1259/bjr.20150603). (PMID:26585543)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective:To determine if subsets of patients may benefit from smaller or larger margins when using laser setup and bony anatomy verification of breast tumour bed (TB) boost radiotherapy (RT).

Methods: Verification imaging data acquired using cone-beam CT, megavoltage CT or two-dimensional kilovoltage imaging on 218 patients were used (1574 images). TB setup errors for laser-only setup (dlaser) and for bony anatomy verification (dbone) were determined using clips implanted into the TB as a gold standard for the TB position. Cases were grouped by centre-, patient- and treatment-related factors, including breast volume, TB position, seroma visibility and surgical technique. Systematic (?) and random (?) TB setup errors were compared between groups, and TB planning target volume margins (MTB) were calculated.

Results: For the study population, ?laser was between 2.8 and 3.4?mm, and ?bone was between 2.2 and 2.6?mm, respectively. Females with larger breasts (p?=?0.03), easily visible seroma (p???0.02) and open surgical technique (p???0.04) had larger ?laser. ?bone was larger for females with larger breasts (p?=?0.02) and lateral tumours (p?=?0.04). Females with medial tumours (p?<?0.01) had smaller ?bone.

Conclusion:If clips are not used, margins should be 8 and 10?mm for bony anatomy verification and laser setup, respectively. Individualization of TB margins may be considered based on breast volume, TB and seroma visibility.

Advances in knowledge:Setup accuracy using lasers and bony anatomy is influenced by patient and treatment factors. Some patients may benefit from clip-based image guidance more than others.

Other
bjr.20150603 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (787kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 19 November 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 January 2016
Published date: February 2016
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 386824
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/386824
ISSN: 0007-1285
PURE UUID: e6e2dbeb-ffdc-41e7-91c1-d533b49a1ed3

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Feb 2016 15:23
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 22:38

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Emma J. Harris
Author: Mukesh B. Mukesh
Author: Ellen M. Donovan
Author: Anna M. Kirby
Author: Joanne S. Haviland
Author: Raj Jena
Author: John Yarnold
Author: Angela Baker
Author: June Dean
Author: Sally Eagle
Author: Helen Mayles
Author: Claire Griffin
Author: Rosalind Perry
Author: Andrew Poynter
Author: Charlotte E. Coles
Author: Philip M. Evans

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×