The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Phytoplankton dynamics in contrasting early stage North Atlantic spring blooms: composition, succession, and potential drivers

Phytoplankton dynamics in contrasting early stage North Atlantic spring blooms: composition, succession, and potential drivers
Phytoplankton dynamics in contrasting early stage North Atlantic spring blooms: composition, succession, and potential drivers
The spring bloom is a key annual event in the phenology of pelagic ecosystems, making a major contribution to the oceanic biological carbon pump through the production and export of organic carbon. However, there is little consensus as to the main drivers of spring bloom formation, exacerbated by a lack of in situ observations of the phytoplankton community composition and its evolution during this critical period.

We investigated the dynamics of the phytoplankton community structure at two contrasting sites in the Iceland and Norwegian basins during the early stage (25 March–25 April) of the 2012 North Atlantic spring bloom. The plankton composition and characteristics of the initial stages of the bloom were markedly different between the two basins. The Iceland Basin (ICB) appeared well mixed down to >400 m, yet surface chlorophyll a (0.27–2.2 mg m?3) and primary production (0.06–0.66 mmol C m?3 d?1) were elevated in the upper 100 m. Although the Norwegian Basin (NWB) had a persistently shallower mixed layer (<100 m), chlorophyll a (0.58–0.93 mg m?3) and primary production (0.08–0.15 mmol C m?3 d?1) remained lower than in the ICB, with picoplankton (<2 ?m) dominating chlorophyll a biomass. The ICB phytoplankton composition appeared primarily driven by the physicochemical environment, with periodic events of increased mixing restricting further increases in biomass. In contrast, the NWB phytoplankton community was potentially limited by physicochemical and/or biological factors such as grazing.

Diatoms dominated the ICB, with the genus Chaetoceros (1–166 cells mL?1) being succeeded by Pseudo-nitzschia (0.2–210 cells mL?1). However, large diatoms (>10 ?m) were virtually absent (<0.5 cells mL?1) from the NWB, with only small nano-sized (<5 ?m) diatoms (i.e. Minidiscus spp.) present (101–600 cells mL?1). We suggest microzooplankton grazing, potentially coupled with the lack of a seed population of bloom-forming diatoms, was restricting diatom growth in the NWB, and that large diatoms may be absent in NWB spring blooms. Despite both phytoplankton communities being in the early stages of bloom formation, different physicochemical and biological factors controlled bloom formation at the two sites. If these differences in phytoplankton composition persist, the subsequent spring blooms are likely to be significantly different in terms of biogeochemistry and trophic interactions throughout the growth season, with important implications for carbon cycling and organic matter export.
1726-4170
2395-2409
Daniels, C.J.
924ebfd2-3de7-4dd9-8592-b4bbe033df4c
Poulton, A.J.
14bf64a7-d617-4913-b882-e8495543e717
Esposito, M.
0b8e33b4-9e00-4481-8ec9-0cded382dd68
Paulsen, M.L.
e0cd9bbf-7432-4f0f-9a1e-483d9c78e3ff
Bellerby, R.
b47af480-b080-4962-91e4-82f30008f1d5
St John, M.
b1a55fe6-7941-4bac-9a3a-f5ca53fd7915
Martin, A.P.
9d0d480d-9b3c-44c2-aafe-bb980ed98a6d
Daniels, C.J.
924ebfd2-3de7-4dd9-8592-b4bbe033df4c
Poulton, A.J.
14bf64a7-d617-4913-b882-e8495543e717
Esposito, M.
0b8e33b4-9e00-4481-8ec9-0cded382dd68
Paulsen, M.L.
e0cd9bbf-7432-4f0f-9a1e-483d9c78e3ff
Bellerby, R.
b47af480-b080-4962-91e4-82f30008f1d5
St John, M.
b1a55fe6-7941-4bac-9a3a-f5ca53fd7915
Martin, A.P.
9d0d480d-9b3c-44c2-aafe-bb980ed98a6d

Daniels, C.J., Poulton, A.J., Esposito, M., Paulsen, M.L., Bellerby, R., St John, M. and Martin, A.P. (2015) Phytoplankton dynamics in contrasting early stage North Atlantic spring blooms: composition, succession, and potential drivers. Biogeosciences, 12 (8), 2395-2409. (doi:10.5194/bg-12-2395-2015).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The spring bloom is a key annual event in the phenology of pelagic ecosystems, making a major contribution to the oceanic biological carbon pump through the production and export of organic carbon. However, there is little consensus as to the main drivers of spring bloom formation, exacerbated by a lack of in situ observations of the phytoplankton community composition and its evolution during this critical period.

We investigated the dynamics of the phytoplankton community structure at two contrasting sites in the Iceland and Norwegian basins during the early stage (25 March–25 April) of the 2012 North Atlantic spring bloom. The plankton composition and characteristics of the initial stages of the bloom were markedly different between the two basins. The Iceland Basin (ICB) appeared well mixed down to >400 m, yet surface chlorophyll a (0.27–2.2 mg m?3) and primary production (0.06–0.66 mmol C m?3 d?1) were elevated in the upper 100 m. Although the Norwegian Basin (NWB) had a persistently shallower mixed layer (<100 m), chlorophyll a (0.58–0.93 mg m?3) and primary production (0.08–0.15 mmol C m?3 d?1) remained lower than in the ICB, with picoplankton (<2 ?m) dominating chlorophyll a biomass. The ICB phytoplankton composition appeared primarily driven by the physicochemical environment, with periodic events of increased mixing restricting further increases in biomass. In contrast, the NWB phytoplankton community was potentially limited by physicochemical and/or biological factors such as grazing.

Diatoms dominated the ICB, with the genus Chaetoceros (1–166 cells mL?1) being succeeded by Pseudo-nitzschia (0.2–210 cells mL?1). However, large diatoms (>10 ?m) were virtually absent (<0.5 cells mL?1) from the NWB, with only small nano-sized (<5 ?m) diatoms (i.e. Minidiscus spp.) present (101–600 cells mL?1). We suggest microzooplankton grazing, potentially coupled with the lack of a seed population of bloom-forming diatoms, was restricting diatom growth in the NWB, and that large diatoms may be absent in NWB spring blooms. Despite both phytoplankton communities being in the early stages of bloom formation, different physicochemical and biological factors controlled bloom formation at the two sites. If these differences in phytoplankton composition persist, the subsequent spring blooms are likely to be significantly different in terms of biogeochemistry and trophic interactions throughout the growth season, with important implications for carbon cycling and organic matter export.

Text
bg-12-2395-2015.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Other.
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: 24 April 2015
Organisations: Marine Biogeochemistry

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 388164
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/388164
ISSN: 1726-4170
PURE UUID: fea9aeaa-5deb-43fc-abb9-7f81bdf9348f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Feb 2016 12:02
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 22:53

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: C.J. Daniels
Author: A.J. Poulton
Author: M. Esposito
Author: M.L. Paulsen
Author: R. Bellerby
Author: M. St John
Author: A.P. Martin

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×