The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Why self-enhancement provokes dislike: The hubris hypothesis and the aversiveness of explicit self-superiority claims

Record type: Article

Most people believe that they are in many respects superior to others. When they publicly express their superiority, they may do so in an explicitly or implicitly comparative manner (“I am better than others” vs. “I am good”). According to the hubris hypothesis, observers dislike explicit self-superiority claims, because these suggest a negative view of others and hence of the observers. The results of two experiments were consistent with the hubris hypothesis. Participants evaluated explicit self-superiority claimants more unfavorably than implicit self-superiority claimants (Experiments 1–2). They attributed less warmth, but not less competence, to explicit than implicit self-superiority claimants (Experiment 2), and this occurred to the extent that participants inferred a negative view of others (Experiments 1–2) and hence of them (Experiment 2).

PDF __filestore.soton.ac.uk_Users_gg_mydocuments_constantine publications pdf's_2016_Van Damme Hoorens Sedikides 2016 (3).pdfeprints.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (1MB)

Citation

Van Damme, C., Hoorens, V. and Sedikides, C. (2016) Why self-enhancement provokes dislike: The hubris hypothesis and the aversiveness of explicit self-superiority claims Self and Identity, 15, (2), pp. 173-190. (doi:10.1080/15298868.2015.1095232).

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 14 September 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 10 November 2015
Published date: February 2016
Keywords: self-enhancement, superiority, self-presentation, social comparison, hubris hypothesis

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 388225
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/388225
ISSN: 1529-8868
PURE UUID: 5ad151b4-1668-4c8a-af29-e84cc52b2ebc

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Feb 2016 16:42
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 19:39

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: C. Van Damme
Author: V. Hoorens
Author: C. Sedikides

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×