The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Do clinical foot and ankle assessments improve the prediction of patient reported outcomes in knee arthroplasty?

Do clinical foot and ankle assessments improve the prediction of patient reported outcomes in knee arthroplasty?
Do clinical foot and ankle assessments improve the prediction of patient reported outcomes in knee arthroplasty?
Knee arthroplasty (KA) has been considered to be a successful and cost-effective intervention for individuals with severe end stage Osteoarthritis (OA). A number of clinically important predictors of outcomes following KA have been established, however there are still other factors to be identified to improve our ability to recognise patients at risk of poor KA outcomes. Although the relationship between foot, ankle and knee kinematics has become widely accepted, it is not known whether foot and ankle status affect KA outcomes. This thesis therefore aims to determine whether clinical foot and ankle measures are useful in predicting patient reported outcomes following KA. A formal literature review was firstly undertaken to identify current methods of assessing musculoskeletal foot and ankle status. Findings of the review revealed an absence of a standardised assessment protocol and a lack of agreement and validity for many current clinical measures. In response to this an international expert consensus study was undertaken to produce an agreed set of objective clinical musculoskeletal foot and ankle assessment measures to form a new protocol. Two measures identified from the review, and agreed via expert consensus, as the most robust assessment methods- the Foot Posture Index (FPI) and ankle dorsiflexion, were introduced to a large prospective cohort of patients awaiting knee arthroplasty, in addition to foot pain questions. Results show that ankle dorsiflexion and foot posture were not associated with one year knee outcomes, however pre-operative foot pain was associated to outcome; the presence of foot pain increased the risk of a poor post-operative clinical outcome. Findings suggest that it would be beneficial to address foot pain prior to surgery to reduce the risks associated with a poor outcome. Further work would be beneficial to establish the sequential link between foot pain and knee OA in order to inform the most appropriate method of the conservative management.
Gates, Lucy
bc67b8b8-110b-4358-8e1b-6f1d345bd503
Gates, Lucy
bc67b8b8-110b-4358-8e1b-6f1d345bd503
Cherry, Lindsey
95256156-ce8c-4e7c-b04d-b6e459232441

Gates, Lucy (2015) Do clinical foot and ankle assessments improve the prediction of patient reported outcomes in knee arthroplasty? University of Southampton, Faculty of Health Sciences, Doctoral Thesis, 406pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Knee arthroplasty (KA) has been considered to be a successful and cost-effective intervention for individuals with severe end stage Osteoarthritis (OA). A number of clinically important predictors of outcomes following KA have been established, however there are still other factors to be identified to improve our ability to recognise patients at risk of poor KA outcomes. Although the relationship between foot, ankle and knee kinematics has become widely accepted, it is not known whether foot and ankle status affect KA outcomes. This thesis therefore aims to determine whether clinical foot and ankle measures are useful in predicting patient reported outcomes following KA. A formal literature review was firstly undertaken to identify current methods of assessing musculoskeletal foot and ankle status. Findings of the review revealed an absence of a standardised assessment protocol and a lack of agreement and validity for many current clinical measures. In response to this an international expert consensus study was undertaken to produce an agreed set of objective clinical musculoskeletal foot and ankle assessment measures to form a new protocol. Two measures identified from the review, and agreed via expert consensus, as the most robust assessment methods- the Foot Posture Index (FPI) and ankle dorsiflexion, were introduced to a large prospective cohort of patients awaiting knee arthroplasty, in addition to foot pain questions. Results show that ankle dorsiflexion and foot posture were not associated with one year knee outcomes, however pre-operative foot pain was associated to outcome; the presence of foot pain increased the risk of a poor post-operative clinical outcome. Findings suggest that it would be beneficial to address foot pain prior to surgery to reduce the risks associated with a poor outcome. Further work would be beneficial to establish the sequential link between foot pain and knee OA in order to inform the most appropriate method of the conservative management.

Text
Final Thesis.pdf - Other
Download (7MB)

More information

Published date: September 2015
Organisations: University of Southampton, Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 388299
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/388299
PURE UUID: 820ac69f-53cf-4708-8e54-61205b88db74
ORCID for Lucy Gates: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8627-3418
ORCID for Lindsey Cherry: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3165-1004

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Feb 2016 11:49
Last modified: 20 Mar 2019 01:33

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×