People and places: understanding geographical accuracy in administrative data from the census and healthcare systems
People and places: understanding geographical accuracy in administrative data from the census and healthcare systems
Administrative systems such as health care registration are of increasing importance in providing information for statistical, research, and policy purposes. There is thus a pressing need to understand better the detailed relationship between population characteristics as recorded in such systems and conventional censuses. This paper explores these issues using the unique Northern Ireland Longitudinal Study (NILS). It takes the 2001 Census enumeration as a benchmark and analyses the social, demographic and spatial patterns of mismatch with the health register at individual level. Descriptive comparison is followed by multivariate and multilevel analyses which show that approximately 25% of individuals are reported to be in different addresses and that age, rurality, education, and housing type are all important factors. This level of mismatch appears to be maintained over time, as earlier migrants who update their address details are replaced by others who have not yet done so. In some cases, apparent mismatches seem likely to reflect complex multi-address living arrangements rather than data error.
Administrative data, census, accuracy, spatial referencing
594-610
Shuttleworth, Ian
dc187c0c-3a9b-46a6-8675-ac05c21676de
Martin, David
e5c52473-e9f0-4f09-b64c-fa32194b162f
March 2016
Shuttleworth, Ian
dc187c0c-3a9b-46a6-8675-ac05c21676de
Martin, David
e5c52473-e9f0-4f09-b64c-fa32194b162f
Shuttleworth, Ian and Martin, David
(2016)
People and places: understanding geographical accuracy in administrative data from the census and healthcare systems.
Environment and Planning A, 48 (3), .
(doi:10.1177/0308518X15618205).
Abstract
Administrative systems such as health care registration are of increasing importance in providing information for statistical, research, and policy purposes. There is thus a pressing need to understand better the detailed relationship between population characteristics as recorded in such systems and conventional censuses. This paper explores these issues using the unique Northern Ireland Longitudinal Study (NILS). It takes the 2001 Census enumeration as a benchmark and analyses the social, demographic and spatial patterns of mismatch with the health register at individual level. Descriptive comparison is followed by multivariate and multilevel analyses which show that approximately 25% of individuals are reported to be in different addresses and that age, rurality, education, and housing type are all important factors. This level of mismatch appears to be maintained over time, as earlier migrants who update their address details are replaced by others who have not yet done so. In some cases, apparent mismatches seem likely to reflect complex multi-address living arrangements rather than data error.
Text
Shuttleworth and Martin 2016 complete.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 4 December 2015
Published date: March 2016
Keywords:
Administrative data, census, accuracy, spatial referencing
Organisations:
Geography & Environment
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 388361
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/388361
ISSN: 0308-518X
PURE UUID: e34ac3fd-e5d3-4700-a673-781a6ceeee07
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Feb 2016 15:22
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:45
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Ian Shuttleworth
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics