Compulsory public service and the right to exit
Compulsory public service and the right to exit
This article addresses Michael Blake and Gillian Brock’s DEBATING BRAIN DRAIN. It argues, contra Blake, that the rights to exit may legitimately be subject to delay. It argues, contra Brock, that such delay is better conceived in terms of a general and reciprocal obligation on citizens that takes the form of compulsory public service.
Owen, David
9fc71bca-07d1-44af-9248-1b9545265a58
Owen, David
9fc71bca-07d1-44af-9248-1b9545265a58
Abstract
This article addresses Michael Blake and Gillian Brock’s DEBATING BRAIN DRAIN. It argues, contra Blake, that the rights to exit may legitimately be subject to delay. It argues, contra Brock, that such delay is better conceived in terms of a general and reciprocal obligation on citizens that takes the form of compulsory public service.
Text
Debating Brain Drain2.docx
- Author's Original
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 6 February 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 26 February 2016
Organisations:
Politics & International Relations
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 389691
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/389691
ISSN: 2194-5616
PURE UUID: 26a19ff3-172e-49d6-9908-32795c000aa0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Mar 2016 10:32
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:50
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics