The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The development of audio-visual integration for temporal judgements

The development of audio-visual integration for temporal judgements
The development of audio-visual integration for temporal judgements
Adults combine information from different sensory modalities to estimate object properties such as size or location. This process is optimal in that (i) sensory information is weighted according to relative reliability: more reliable estimates have more influence on the combined estimate and (ii) the combined estimate is more reliable than the component uni-modal estimates. Previous studies suggest that optimal sensory integration does not emerge until around 10 years of age. Younger children rely on a single modality or combine information using inappropriate sensory weights.

Children aged 4-11 and adults completed a simple audio-visual task in which they reported either the number of beeps or the number of flashes in uni-modal and bi-modal conditions. In bi-modal trials, beeps and flashes differed in number by 0, 1 or 2.

Mutual interactions between the sensory signals were evident at all ages: the reported number of flashes was influenced by the number of simultaneously presented beeps and vice versa. Furthermore, for all ages, the relative strength of these interactions was predicted by the relative reliabilities of the two modalities, in other words, all observers weighted the signals appropriately.
The degree of cross-modal interaction decreased with age: the youngest observers could not ignore the task-irrelevant modality – they fully combined vision and audition such that they perceived equal numbers of flashes and beeps for bi-modal stimuli. Older observers showed much smaller effects of the task-irrelevant modality.

Do these interactions reflect optimal integration? Full or partial cross-modal integration predicts improved reliability in bi-modal conditions. In contrast, switching between modalities reduces reliability. Model comparison suggests that older observers employed partial integration, whereas younger observers (up to around 8 years) did not integrate, but followed a sub-optimal switching strategy, responding according to either visual or auditory information on each trial.
1553-734X
Adams, Wendy J.
25685aaa-fc54-4d25-8d65-f35f4c5ab688
Adams, Wendy J.
25685aaa-fc54-4d25-8d65-f35f4c5ab688

Adams, Wendy J. (2016) The development of audio-visual integration for temporal judgements PLoS Computational Biology (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004865).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Adults combine information from different sensory modalities to estimate object properties such as size or location. This process is optimal in that (i) sensory information is weighted according to relative reliability: more reliable estimates have more influence on the combined estimate and (ii) the combined estimate is more reliable than the component uni-modal estimates. Previous studies suggest that optimal sensory integration does not emerge until around 10 years of age. Younger children rely on a single modality or combine information using inappropriate sensory weights.

Children aged 4-11 and adults completed a simple audio-visual task in which they reported either the number of beeps or the number of flashes in uni-modal and bi-modal conditions. In bi-modal trials, beeps and flashes differed in number by 0, 1 or 2.

Mutual interactions between the sensory signals were evident at all ages: the reported number of flashes was influenced by the number of simultaneously presented beeps and vice versa. Furthermore, for all ages, the relative strength of these interactions was predicted by the relative reliabilities of the two modalities, in other words, all observers weighted the signals appropriately.
The degree of cross-modal interaction decreased with age: the youngest observers could not ignore the task-irrelevant modality – they fully combined vision and audition such that they perceived equal numbers of flashes and beeps for bi-modal stimuli. Older observers showed much smaller effects of the task-irrelevant modality.

Do these interactions reflect optimal integration? Full or partial cross-modal integration predicts improved reliability in bi-modal conditions. In contrast, switching between modalities reduces reliability. Model comparison suggests that older observers employed partial integration, whereas younger observers (up to around 8 years) did not integrate, but followed a sub-optimal switching strategy, responding according to either visual or auditory information on each trial.

Text Adams2016_PLOS_CompBio.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 14 March 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 14 April 2016
Published date: 14 April 2016

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 389779
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/389779
ISSN: 1553-734X
PURE UUID: 75a17fd8-adc6-4921-a632-4b14c0ce67e1
ORCID for Wendy J. Adams: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5832-1056

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Mar 2016 10:18
Last modified: 26 Oct 2017 16:33

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Wendy J. Adams ORCID iD

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×