Palaeolithic radiocarbon chronology: quantifying our confidence beyond two half-lives
Palaeolithic radiocarbon chronology: quantifying our confidence beyond two half-lives
It is now three decades since Waterbolk introduced evaluation criteria to 14C chronology. Despite this, and other subsequent attempts to introduce quality control in the use of 14C data, no systematic procedure has been adopted by the archaeological community. As a result, our databases may be significantly weakened by questionable dates and/or questionable associations between dated samples and the archaeological phenomena they are intended to represent. As the use of chronometric data in general becomes more ambitious, we must pause and assess how reliable these data are. Here, we forward a set of evaluation criteria which take into account archaeological (e.g. associational, stratigraphic) and chronometric (e.g. pre-treatment and measurement) criteria. We intend to use such criteria to evaluate a large 14C dataset we have assembled to investigate Late Glacial settlement in Europe, the Near East and North Africa, supported by the Leverhulme Trust. We suggest that the procedure presented here may at least form the basis of the development of more rigorous, scientific use of 14C dates.
1685-1693
Pettitt, P.B
42b5d1d2-3c7a-4fca-b958-02bd034f48b9
Davies, W.
e3eb963e-359c-41c3-b4e6-a721e6399633
Gamble, C.S.
1cbd0b26-ddac-4dc2-9cf7-59c66d06103a
Richards, M.B.
00cca585-9db6-4f3c-84dd-1589f7296379
December 2003
Pettitt, P.B
42b5d1d2-3c7a-4fca-b958-02bd034f48b9
Davies, W.
e3eb963e-359c-41c3-b4e6-a721e6399633
Gamble, C.S.
1cbd0b26-ddac-4dc2-9cf7-59c66d06103a
Richards, M.B.
00cca585-9db6-4f3c-84dd-1589f7296379
Pettitt, P.B, Davies, W., Gamble, C.S. and Richards, M.B.
(2003)
Palaeolithic radiocarbon chronology: quantifying our confidence beyond two half-lives.
Journal of Archaeological Science, 30 (12), .
(doi:10.1016/S0305-4403(03)00070-0).
Abstract
It is now three decades since Waterbolk introduced evaluation criteria to 14C chronology. Despite this, and other subsequent attempts to introduce quality control in the use of 14C data, no systematic procedure has been adopted by the archaeological community. As a result, our databases may be significantly weakened by questionable dates and/or questionable associations between dated samples and the archaeological phenomena they are intended to represent. As the use of chronometric data in general becomes more ambitious, we must pause and assess how reliable these data are. Here, we forward a set of evaluation criteria which take into account archaeological (e.g. associational, stratigraphic) and chronometric (e.g. pre-treatment and measurement) criteria. We intend to use such criteria to evaluate a large 14C dataset we have assembled to investigate Late Glacial settlement in Europe, the Near East and North Africa, supported by the Leverhulme Trust. We suggest that the procedure presented here may at least form the basis of the development of more rigorous, scientific use of 14C dates.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 6 May 2003
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 July 2003
Published date: December 2003
Organisations:
Archaeology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 391502
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/391502
ISSN: 0305-4403
PURE UUID: b950c019-d913-40a2-9edf-46dacf177ca6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Apr 2016 14:05
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 23:30
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
P.B Pettitt
Author:
W. Davies
Author:
M.B. Richards
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics