The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The theory-practice gap: impact of professional-bureaucratic work conflict on newly-qualified nurses

The theory-practice gap: impact of professional-bureaucratic work conflict on newly-qualified nurses
The theory-practice gap: impact of professional-bureaucratic work conflict on newly-qualified nurses
Aim: This paper reports the findings from a naturalistic enquiry undertaken in the United Kingdom into the extent to which the ideals and values of the preregistration nursing course are adopted by individual newly educated Registered Nurses.
Background: Research in several countries provides consistent evidence of the existence of a theory–practice gap in nursing. Clear disparities have been demonstrated between the best practice ideals and values that are taught and those actually encountered in everyday practice. Nurse education 'Project 2000' reforms in the United Kingdom were designed, in part, to address this issue. Few studies to date have examined the impact of these reforms on newly qualified Registered Nurses' ability to translate theory into practice.
Methods: A longitudinal study was carried out in three educational institutions in the United Kingdom from 1997 to 2000. Final year nursing students (n = 72) in three colleges of nursing completed questionnaires to elicit views on their ideals and values for practice. In-depth interviews with a purposive subsample of 26 participants (at 4–6 and 11–15 months postqualification) indicated the extent to which these ideals and values were adopted in practice. Interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed, and data were analysed using constant comparison and negative case analysis.
Findings: Although new nurses emerged from their programmes with a strong set of nursing values, a number of professional and organizational factors effectively sabotaged implementation. Professional sabotage includes obeying covert rules, lack of support and poor nursing role models. Organizational sabotage includes structural and organizational constraints such as time pressures, role constraints, staff shortages and work overload.
Conclusion: The disparity between nursing as taught and as practised may have profound implications for the future of the profession both in the United Kingdom and internationally, in terms of morale, job satisfaction and retention. Measures to improve resources and reduce the professional–bureaucratic work conflict are discussed.
longitudinal study, nursing, nursing students, staff shortages, theory-practice gap, values, work overload
0309-2402
465-477
Maben, J.
482f92f0-6339-42dd-9ee5-3fbc08d1e6f0
Latter, S.
83f100a4-95ec-4f2e-99a5-186095de2f3b
Macleod Clark, J.
3546dbbb-5ae9-4247-a520-58860d492e2f
Maben, J.
482f92f0-6339-42dd-9ee5-3fbc08d1e6f0
Latter, S.
83f100a4-95ec-4f2e-99a5-186095de2f3b
Macleod Clark, J.
3546dbbb-5ae9-4247-a520-58860d492e2f

Maben, J., Latter, S. and Macleod Clark, J. (2006) The theory-practice gap: impact of professional-bureaucratic work conflict on newly-qualified nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55 (4), 465-477. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03939.x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Aim: This paper reports the findings from a naturalistic enquiry undertaken in the United Kingdom into the extent to which the ideals and values of the preregistration nursing course are adopted by individual newly educated Registered Nurses.
Background: Research in several countries provides consistent evidence of the existence of a theory–practice gap in nursing. Clear disparities have been demonstrated between the best practice ideals and values that are taught and those actually encountered in everyday practice. Nurse education 'Project 2000' reforms in the United Kingdom were designed, in part, to address this issue. Few studies to date have examined the impact of these reforms on newly qualified Registered Nurses' ability to translate theory into practice.
Methods: A longitudinal study was carried out in three educational institutions in the United Kingdom from 1997 to 2000. Final year nursing students (n = 72) in three colleges of nursing completed questionnaires to elicit views on their ideals and values for practice. In-depth interviews with a purposive subsample of 26 participants (at 4–6 and 11–15 months postqualification) indicated the extent to which these ideals and values were adopted in practice. Interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed, and data were analysed using constant comparison and negative case analysis.
Findings: Although new nurses emerged from their programmes with a strong set of nursing values, a number of professional and organizational factors effectively sabotaged implementation. Professional sabotage includes obeying covert rules, lack of support and poor nursing role models. Organizational sabotage includes structural and organizational constraints such as time pressures, role constraints, staff shortages and work overload.
Conclusion: The disparity between nursing as taught and as practised may have profound implications for the future of the profession both in the United Kingdom and internationally, in terms of morale, job satisfaction and retention. Measures to improve resources and reduce the professional–bureaucratic work conflict are discussed.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: August 2006
Keywords: longitudinal study, nursing, nursing students, staff shortages, theory-practice gap, values, work overload

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 39300
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/39300
ISSN: 0309-2402
PURE UUID: c8bb9a29-d9ef-4033-a383-232c14074086
ORCID for S. Latter: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0973-0512

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Sep 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:16

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: J. Maben
Author: S. Latter ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×