The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Inferentialism and our knowledge of others’ minds

Inferentialism and our knowledge of others’ minds
Inferentialism and our knowledge of others’ minds
Our knowledge of each others’ mental features is sometimes epistemically basic or non-inferential. The alternative to this claim is Inferentialism, the view that such knowledge is always epistemically inferential. Here, I argue that Inferentialism is not plausible. My argument takes the form of an inference to the best explanation. Given the nature of the task involved in recognizing what mental features others have on particular occasions, and our capacity to perform that task, we should not expect always to find good inferential explanations of our knowledge. This conclusion is an epistemological one. The motivation for it is independent of metaphysical concerns about functionalism or about the best way to model the cognitive architecture which produces our knowledge of others’ minds. Given this it is compatible both with the truth of functionalism and theory–theory construed as a cognitive model.
0031-8116
1435-1454
Mcneill, William
be33c4df-0f0e-42bf-8b9b-3c0afe8cb69e
Mcneill, William
be33c4df-0f0e-42bf-8b9b-3c0afe8cb69e

Mcneill, William (2015) Inferentialism and our knowledge of others’ minds. Philosophical Studies, 172 (6), 1435-1454. (doi:10.1007/s11098-014-0358-0).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Our knowledge of each others’ mental features is sometimes epistemically basic or non-inferential. The alternative to this claim is Inferentialism, the view that such knowledge is always epistemically inferential. Here, I argue that Inferentialism is not plausible. My argument takes the form of an inference to the best explanation. Given the nature of the task involved in recognizing what mental features others have on particular occasions, and our capacity to perform that task, we should not expect always to find good inferential explanations of our knowledge. This conclusion is an epistemological one. The motivation for it is independent of metaphysical concerns about functionalism or about the best way to model the cognitive architecture which produces our knowledge of others’ minds. Given this it is compatible both with the truth of functionalism and theory–theory construed as a cognitive model.

Text
IKOM journal issue 2015
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (314kB)
Request a copy

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 5 August 2014
Published date: June 2015
Organisations: Philosophy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 393212
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/393212
ISSN: 0031-8116
PURE UUID: 3392c369-ca15-4d68-a5b6-829106b9582f
ORCID for William Mcneill: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3647-0720

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 May 2016 12:59
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:53

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×