The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Effectiveness of steam inhalation and nasal irrigation for chronic or recurrent sinus symptoms in primary care: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Effectiveness of steam inhalation and nasal irrigation for chronic or recurrent sinus symptoms in primary care: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
Effectiveness of steam inhalation and nasal irrigation for chronic or recurrent sinus symptoms in primary care: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
Background: Systematic reviews support saline nasal irrigation for chronic/recurrent sinus symptoms but the trials are small, and few in typical primary care settings. Steam inhalation is poorly evidence-based. Our aim was to estimate the impact of brief pragmatic interventions to use steam and nasal irrigation.

Methods: Adults with a history of recurrent/chronic sinusitis and reporting significant impact on quality-of-life from 72 UK general practices, were randomised to four advice strategies by a practice nurse, using numbered opaque sealed envelopes: 1) usual care 2) steam inhalation daily 3) saline nasal irrigation daily supported by a demonstration video 4) Irrigation and steam inhalation.

Results: 961 individuals consented. 871 returned baseline questionnaires (respectively n=210,n=219,n=232,n=210) and 671/871 (77%) participants self-reported Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) scores at 3 months (the primary outcome). Multiple imputation avoided assuming data was missing completely at random. RSDI scores improved with both nasal irrigation and no irrigation (-7.4 and -5.2 respectively; adjusted estimate of the difference -2.51, 95% confidence intervals -4.65 to -0.37, p=0.021). By 6 months, significantly more patients maintained a 10 point clinically important improvement in the RSDI (44.1%, 36.6% respectively); fewer used over-the-counter (OTC) medications (59.4%, 68%) or intended to consult the doctor. Steam inhalation reduced headache but no other outcomes. There was no evidence of harms with either intervention.

Interpretation: Steam inhalation for chronic sinus symptoms in primary care is not effective. A brief pragmatic intervention to encourage nasal irrigation is less effective than prior evidence suggests, but provides some symptomatic benefit, and empowers self- management.
ISRCTN88204146
0820-3946
940-949
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Stuart, Beth
626862fc-892b-4f6d-9cbb-7a8d7172b209
Mullee, Mark
fd3f91c3-5e95-4f56-8d73-260824eeb362
Thomas, Tammy
742fc3b2-61cb-4f87-8466-afa31b3c8d8e
Johnson, Sophie
9919c64a-b60b-4371-81bc-9540db19a56b
Leydon, Gerry
c5cdaff5-0fa1-4d38-b575-b97c2892ec40
Rabago, David
9fb58149-3df1-48cc-8ae1-497d2d490d8a
Richards-Hall, Samantha
dec677d7-b6a7-4e99-b10e-c1e22b3055cf
Williamson, Ian
12381296-edbf-4ac5-969b-dcb559c22f27
Yao, Lily
d777f84c-cf3d-4fad-bbc1-ea01dec01695
Raftery, James
27c2661d-6c4f-448a-bf36-9a89ec72bd6b
Zhu, Shihua
13511f9c-151c-483c-9dfd-2da13421db5c
Moore, Michael
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Stuart, Beth
626862fc-892b-4f6d-9cbb-7a8d7172b209
Mullee, Mark
fd3f91c3-5e95-4f56-8d73-260824eeb362
Thomas, Tammy
742fc3b2-61cb-4f87-8466-afa31b3c8d8e
Johnson, Sophie
9919c64a-b60b-4371-81bc-9540db19a56b
Leydon, Gerry
c5cdaff5-0fa1-4d38-b575-b97c2892ec40
Rabago, David
9fb58149-3df1-48cc-8ae1-497d2d490d8a
Richards-Hall, Samantha
dec677d7-b6a7-4e99-b10e-c1e22b3055cf
Williamson, Ian
12381296-edbf-4ac5-969b-dcb559c22f27
Yao, Lily
d777f84c-cf3d-4fad-bbc1-ea01dec01695
Raftery, James
27c2661d-6c4f-448a-bf36-9a89ec72bd6b
Zhu, Shihua
13511f9c-151c-483c-9dfd-2da13421db5c
Moore, Michael
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99

Little, Paul, Stuart, Beth, Mullee, Mark, Thomas, Tammy, Johnson, Sophie, Leydon, Gerry, Rabago, David, Richards-Hall, Samantha, Williamson, Ian, Yao, Lily, Raftery, James, Zhu, Shihua and Moore, Michael (2016) Effectiveness of steam inhalation and nasal irrigation for chronic or recurrent sinus symptoms in primary care: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 118 (13), 940-949. (doi:10.1503/cmaj.160362).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Systematic reviews support saline nasal irrigation for chronic/recurrent sinus symptoms but the trials are small, and few in typical primary care settings. Steam inhalation is poorly evidence-based. Our aim was to estimate the impact of brief pragmatic interventions to use steam and nasal irrigation.

Methods: Adults with a history of recurrent/chronic sinusitis and reporting significant impact on quality-of-life from 72 UK general practices, were randomised to four advice strategies by a practice nurse, using numbered opaque sealed envelopes: 1) usual care 2) steam inhalation daily 3) saline nasal irrigation daily supported by a demonstration video 4) Irrigation and steam inhalation.

Results: 961 individuals consented. 871 returned baseline questionnaires (respectively n=210,n=219,n=232,n=210) and 671/871 (77%) participants self-reported Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) scores at 3 months (the primary outcome). Multiple imputation avoided assuming data was missing completely at random. RSDI scores improved with both nasal irrigation and no irrigation (-7.4 and -5.2 respectively; adjusted estimate of the difference -2.51, 95% confidence intervals -4.65 to -0.37, p=0.021). By 6 months, significantly more patients maintained a 10 point clinically important improvement in the RSDI (44.1%, 36.6% respectively); fewer used over-the-counter (OTC) medications (59.4%, 68%) or intended to consult the doctor. Steam inhalation reduced headache but no other outcomes. There was no evidence of harms with either intervention.

Interpretation: Steam inhalation for chronic sinus symptoms in primary care is not effective. A brief pragmatic intervention to encourage nasal irrigation is less effective than prior evidence suggests, but provides some symptomatic benefit, and empowers self- management.
ISRCTN88204146

Text
A Primary Care RCT of Steam inhalation and nasal irrigation for recurrent or chronic sinus symptom (SNIFS) trial CMAJ May 2016.docx - Accepted Manuscript
Download (96kB)
Text
SNIFSpaperdraftaclean.docx - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 13 May 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 September 2016
Published date: 20 September 2016
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 394376
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/394376
ISSN: 0820-3946
PURE UUID: b33c1488-3d2a-4b09-8ea1-9b3a8391bb60
ORCID for Paul Little: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3664-1873
ORCID for Beth Stuart: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5432-7437
ORCID for Gerry Leydon: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5986-3300
ORCID for Michael Moore: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-4509

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 May 2016 08:11
Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 01:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Paul Little ORCID iD
Author: Beth Stuart ORCID iD
Author: Mark Mullee
Author: Tammy Thomas
Author: Sophie Johnson
Author: Gerry Leydon ORCID iD
Author: David Rabago
Author: Samantha Richards-Hall
Author: Ian Williamson
Author: Lily Yao
Author: James Raftery
Author: Shihua Zhu
Author: Michael Moore ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×