Dating European Palaeolithic rock art: progress, prospects, problems.
Dating European Palaeolithic rock art: progress, prospects, problems.
Over the last decade several dozen direct dates on cave art pigments or associated materials have supplemented more traditional style-based attempts to establish a chronological (and developmental) scheme for cave art. In the “post-stylistic” era an holistic integration of pigment “recipe” analysis, formal stylistic analysis and direct chronometric dating have been applied to a handful of dates. Here, we examine the state-of-the-art of Palaeolithic cave art dating, with particular emphasis on certain radiocarbon and Uranium-series projects. We examine the relative successes and weaknesses of this cutting edge science. We conclude that there are several weaknesses in current applications that are in serious need of addressing. Issues of sample contamination and of the heuristic relationship between materials dated and the production of the art are particularly problematic. It follows that one should at present be very cautious about straightforward interpretations of apparent “dates” of cave art.
27-47
Pettitt, Paul
c16321c1-e3aa-4413-9963-80fac13ea4e9
Pike, Alistair
e8603e20-0a89-4d57-a294-247b983fc857
March 2007
Pettitt, Paul
c16321c1-e3aa-4413-9963-80fac13ea4e9
Pike, Alistair
e8603e20-0a89-4d57-a294-247b983fc857
Pettitt, Paul and Pike, Alistair
(2007)
Dating European Palaeolithic rock art: progress, prospects, problems.
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14 (1), .
(doi:10.1007/s10816-007-9026-4).
Abstract
Over the last decade several dozen direct dates on cave art pigments or associated materials have supplemented more traditional style-based attempts to establish a chronological (and developmental) scheme for cave art. In the “post-stylistic” era an holistic integration of pigment “recipe” analysis, formal stylistic analysis and direct chronometric dating have been applied to a handful of dates. Here, we examine the state-of-the-art of Palaeolithic cave art dating, with particular emphasis on certain radiocarbon and Uranium-series projects. We examine the relative successes and weaknesses of this cutting edge science. We conclude that there are several weaknesses in current applications that are in serious need of addressing. Issues of sample contamination and of the heuristic relationship between materials dated and the production of the art are particularly problematic. It follows that one should at present be very cautious about straightforward interpretations of apparent “dates” of cave art.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: March 2007
Organisations:
Archaeology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 394412
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/394412
ISSN: 1072-5369
PURE UUID: ed35a8c9-a8a8-4baf-90bd-57990a9c6bfc
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 27 Jun 2016 15:54
Last modified: 11 Jul 2024 01:50
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Paul Pettitt
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics