‘Shaky’ times for arbitration clauses: rethinking business common sense
‘Shaky’ times for arbitration clauses: rethinking business common sense
English courts have held that clear words of incorporation of the arbitration clause (contained in the charterparty) are indispensable in the bill of lading, to bind consignees who had never witnessed the charterparty. This approach is for the protection of consignees as third parties. In this article, attention will be paid to the identification of problems relating to the form that a charterparty should have to be appropriate for incorporation. Whether charterparties can be superseded by other types of documents will also be examined. Last but not least, the author will critically assess the rules of construction followed in recent cases where ambiguous language has been used in incorporation clauses in bills of lading. In the last few months, three judgments have been issued which have produced highly controversial outcomes. The author asserts that the method of construction should not be considered as a distinct method from that of incorporation of clauses. Times have changed and, apparently, so has business common sense. However, ‘uncertain certainty’ has been caused because business common sense has been applied differently to judgments that have been issued with a couple of months difference.
199-221
Magklasi, Eleni
541b1483-3a0d-44f6-a268-395c1fb49a9f
1 March 2016
Magklasi, Eleni
541b1483-3a0d-44f6-a268-395c1fb49a9f
Magklasi, Eleni
(2016)
‘Shaky’ times for arbitration clauses: rethinking business common sense.
Arbitration International, 32 (1), .
(doi:10.1093/arbint/aiv067).
Abstract
English courts have held that clear words of incorporation of the arbitration clause (contained in the charterparty) are indispensable in the bill of lading, to bind consignees who had never witnessed the charterparty. This approach is for the protection of consignees as third parties. In this article, attention will be paid to the identification of problems relating to the form that a charterparty should have to be appropriate for incorporation. Whether charterparties can be superseded by other types of documents will also be examined. Last but not least, the author will critically assess the rules of construction followed in recent cases where ambiguous language has been used in incorporation clauses in bills of lading. In the last few months, three judgments have been issued which have produced highly controversial outcomes. The author asserts that the method of construction should not be considered as a distinct method from that of incorporation of clauses. Times have changed and, apparently, so has business common sense. However, ‘uncertain certainty’ has been caused because business common sense has been applied differently to judgments that have been issued with a couple of months difference.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 November 2015
Published date: 1 March 2016
Organisations:
Southampton Law School
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 394480
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/394480
ISSN: 0957-0411
PURE UUID: 5e06492d-e1cd-4365-8ef6-f9b39ac4d5ba
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 May 2016 11:33
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 00:23
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Eleni Magklasi
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics