The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Chapter 18 - A Review of regression procedures for randomizedresponse data, including univariate and multivariatelogistic regression, the proportional odds model anditem response model, and self-protective responses

Chapter 18 - A Review of regression procedures for randomizedresponse data, including univariate and multivariatelogistic regression, the proportional odds model anditem response model, and self-protective responses
Chapter 18 - A Review of regression procedures for randomizedresponse data, including univariate and multivariatelogistic regression, the proportional odds model anditem response model, and self-protective responses
In survey research, it is often problematic to ask people sensitive questions because they may refuse to answer or they may provide a socially desirable answer that does not reveal their true status on the sensitive question. To solve this problem Warner (1965) proposed randomized response (RR). Here, a chance mechanism hides why respondents say yes or no to the question being asked. Thus far RR has been mainly used in research to estimate the prevalence of sensitive characteristics. It is not uncommon that researchers wrongly believe that the RR procedure has the drawback that it is not possible to relate the sensitive characteristics to explanatory variables. Here, we provide a review of the literature of regression procedures for dichotomous RR data. Univariate RR data can be analyzed with a version of logistic regression that is adapted so that it can handle data collected by RR. Subsequently the manuscript presents extensions towards repeated cross-sectional data that allowed for a change in the design with which the RR data are collected. We also review regression procedures for multivariate dichotomous RR data, such as the model by Glonek and McCullagh (1995), a model for the sum of a set of dichotomous RR data, and a model from item response theory that assumes a latent variable that explains the answers on the RR variables. We end with a discussion of a recent development in the analysis of multivariate RR data, namely models that take into account that there may be respondents that do not follow the instructions of the RR design by answering no whatever the sensitive question asked. These are coined self-protective responses.
0169-7161
287-315
Elsevier
Cruyff, M.
87113ca0-c784-493a-b96e-5ad4a9e16465
Bockenholt, U.
ab134de4-5066-4e1d-923b-3ff42cad840a
Van Der Heijden, Peter G.M.
85157917-3b33-4683-81be-713f987fd612
Frank, L.
0738f29c-ff34-4f14-8b35-c23f8106cba3
Chaudhuri, Arijit
Christofides, Tasos C.
Rao, C.R.
Cruyff, M.
87113ca0-c784-493a-b96e-5ad4a9e16465
Bockenholt, U.
ab134de4-5066-4e1d-923b-3ff42cad840a
Van Der Heijden, Peter G.M.
85157917-3b33-4683-81be-713f987fd612
Frank, L.
0738f29c-ff34-4f14-8b35-c23f8106cba3
Chaudhuri, Arijit
Christofides, Tasos C.
Rao, C.R.

Cruyff, M., Bockenholt, U., Van Der Heijden, Peter G.M. and Frank, L. (2016) Chapter 18 - A Review of regression procedures for randomizedresponse data, including univariate and multivariatelogistic regression, the proportional odds model anditem response model, and self-protective responses. In, Chaudhuri, Arijit, Christofides, Tasos C. and Rao, C.R. (eds.) Data Gathering, Analysis and Protection of Privacy through Randomized Response Techniques: Qualitative and Quantitative Human Traits. (Handbook of Statistics, 34) Amsterdam, NL. Elsevier, pp. 287-315. (doi:10.1016/bs.host.2016.01.016).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

In survey research, it is often problematic to ask people sensitive questions because they may refuse to answer or they may provide a socially desirable answer that does not reveal their true status on the sensitive question. To solve this problem Warner (1965) proposed randomized response (RR). Here, a chance mechanism hides why respondents say yes or no to the question being asked. Thus far RR has been mainly used in research to estimate the prevalence of sensitive characteristics. It is not uncommon that researchers wrongly believe that the RR procedure has the drawback that it is not possible to relate the sensitive characteristics to explanatory variables. Here, we provide a review of the literature of regression procedures for dichotomous RR data. Univariate RR data can be analyzed with a version of logistic regression that is adapted so that it can handle data collected by RR. Subsequently the manuscript presents extensions towards repeated cross-sectional data that allowed for a change in the design with which the RR data are collected. We also review regression procedures for multivariate dichotomous RR data, such as the model by Glonek and McCullagh (1995), a model for the sum of a set of dichotomous RR data, and a model from item response theory that assumes a latent variable that explains the answers on the RR variables. We end with a discussion of a recent development in the analysis of multivariate RR data, namely models that take into account that there may be respondents that do not follow the instructions of the RR design by answering no whatever the sensitive question asked. These are coined self-protective responses.

Text
1cfc6854-8aa4-4ad4-8122-c47e845d33ab - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Cruyff et al. 2016 uncorrected proof.pdf - Proof
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 29 March 2016
Published date: 2016
Organisations: Social Statistics & Demography

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 394572
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/394572
ISSN: 0169-7161
PURE UUID: 1cfc6854-8aa4-4ad4-8122-c47e845d33ab
ORCID for Peter G.M. Van Der Heijden: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3345-096X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 May 2016 16:24
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:46

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: M. Cruyff
Author: U. Bockenholt
Author: L. Frank
Editor: Arijit Chaudhuri
Editor: Tasos C. Christofides
Editor: C.R. Rao

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×