The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Factors affecting the human attribution of emotions toward animals

Factors affecting the human attribution of emotions toward animals
Factors affecting the human attribution of emotions toward animals
Attribution of emotions to animals can affect human–animal interactions and dictate animal welfare laws. However, little is known about the factors that influence these attributions. We investigated the effect of belief in animal mind, pet ownership, emotional intelligence, eating orientation, and gender on the attribution of different emotions to a variety of species, from different taxonomic classes, considered as Pet, Use (e.g., used for food, experimentation), or Pest animals. Three hundred and forty-seven participants, aged between 16 and 65 years, completed a questionnaire that measured their belief in the capacity for animals to experience seven primary and secondary emotions. The results showed that attribution of emotions to animals is inconsistent. The ambiguity appears to hinge, in part, upon an animal's functional category and their perceived place in the commonly supposed, though inaccurate, linear hierarchy of species. Nonetheless, the wide range of emotions that were attributed to all species highlights the complex and potentially disorganized thoughts that humans have concerning animals. Belief in animal mind was found to be the strongest and only predictor of emotion attribution to animals in general, but is probably because both are part of the same underlying construct. Ownership of some species—rabbits, horses, rodents and birds—mediated the emotions attributed to that particular species. We conclude that ambiguous attitudes influence the standards of welfare for animals used by humans and that the dichotomous attitudes permit exploitation and welfare violations against animals. Greater understanding of emotion attribution has the potential to improve humane education methods, and suggestions for future research are made.
0892-7936
357-369
Wilkins, A.M.
96177cb3-cae2-4bb9-9a05-eb0138d78bc2
McCrae, L.S.
f29110b3-2d4d-4282-90c6-eece5bda5c65
Mcbride, E.A.
8f13b829-a141-4b67-b2d7-08f839972646
Wilkins, A.M.
96177cb3-cae2-4bb9-9a05-eb0138d78bc2
McCrae, L.S.
f29110b3-2d4d-4282-90c6-eece5bda5c65
Mcbride, E.A.
8f13b829-a141-4b67-b2d7-08f839972646

Wilkins, A.M., McCrae, L.S. and Mcbride, E.A. (2015) Factors affecting the human attribution of emotions toward animals. Anthrozoos A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals, 28 (3), 357-369. (doi:10.1080/08927936.2015.1052270).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Attribution of emotions to animals can affect human–animal interactions and dictate animal welfare laws. However, little is known about the factors that influence these attributions. We investigated the effect of belief in animal mind, pet ownership, emotional intelligence, eating orientation, and gender on the attribution of different emotions to a variety of species, from different taxonomic classes, considered as Pet, Use (e.g., used for food, experimentation), or Pest animals. Three hundred and forty-seven participants, aged between 16 and 65 years, completed a questionnaire that measured their belief in the capacity for animals to experience seven primary and secondary emotions. The results showed that attribution of emotions to animals is inconsistent. The ambiguity appears to hinge, in part, upon an animal's functional category and their perceived place in the commonly supposed, though inaccurate, linear hierarchy of species. Nonetheless, the wide range of emotions that were attributed to all species highlights the complex and potentially disorganized thoughts that humans have concerning animals. Belief in animal mind was found to be the strongest and only predictor of emotion attribution to animals in general, but is probably because both are part of the same underlying construct. Ownership of some species—rabbits, horses, rodents and birds—mediated the emotions attributed to that particular species. We conclude that ambiguous attitudes influence the standards of welfare for animals used by humans and that the dichotomous attitudes permit exploitation and welfare violations against animals. Greater understanding of emotion attribution has the potential to improve humane education methods, and suggestions for future research are made.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 6 October 2015
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 395493
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/395493
ISSN: 0892-7936
PURE UUID: f371b390-a262-4f7f-84e6-5d78b45d6de8

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 May 2016 11:09
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 00:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A.M. Wilkins
Author: L.S. McCrae
Author: E.A. Mcbride

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×