Factors affecting the human attribution of emotions toward animals
Factors affecting the human attribution of emotions toward animals
Attribution of emotions to animals can affect human–animal interactions and dictate animal welfare laws. However, little is known about the factors that influence these attributions. We investigated the effect of belief in animal mind, pet ownership, emotional intelligence, eating orientation, and gender on the attribution of different emotions to a variety of species, from different taxonomic classes, considered as Pet, Use (e.g., used for food, experimentation), or Pest animals. Three hundred and forty-seven participants, aged between 16 and 65 years, completed a questionnaire that measured their belief in the capacity for animals to experience seven primary and secondary emotions. The results showed that attribution of emotions to animals is inconsistent. The ambiguity appears to hinge, in part, upon an animal's functional category and their perceived place in the commonly supposed, though inaccurate, linear hierarchy of species. Nonetheless, the wide range of emotions that were attributed to all species highlights the complex and potentially disorganized thoughts that humans have concerning animals. Belief in animal mind was found to be the strongest and only predictor of emotion attribution to animals in general, but is probably because both are part of the same underlying construct. Ownership of some species—rabbits, horses, rodents and birds—mediated the emotions attributed to that particular species. We conclude that ambiguous attitudes influence the standards of welfare for animals used by humans and that the dichotomous attitudes permit exploitation and welfare violations against animals. Greater understanding of emotion attribution has the potential to improve humane education methods, and suggestions for future research are made.
357-369
Wilkins, A.M.
96177cb3-cae2-4bb9-9a05-eb0138d78bc2
McCrae, L.S.
f29110b3-2d4d-4282-90c6-eece5bda5c65
Mcbride, E.A.
8f13b829-a141-4b67-b2d7-08f839972646
Wilkins, A.M.
96177cb3-cae2-4bb9-9a05-eb0138d78bc2
McCrae, L.S.
f29110b3-2d4d-4282-90c6-eece5bda5c65
Mcbride, E.A.
8f13b829-a141-4b67-b2d7-08f839972646
Wilkins, A.M., McCrae, L.S. and Mcbride, E.A.
(2015)
Factors affecting the human attribution of emotions toward animals.
Anthrozoos A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals, 28 (3), .
(doi:10.1080/08927936.2015.1052270).
Abstract
Attribution of emotions to animals can affect human–animal interactions and dictate animal welfare laws. However, little is known about the factors that influence these attributions. We investigated the effect of belief in animal mind, pet ownership, emotional intelligence, eating orientation, and gender on the attribution of different emotions to a variety of species, from different taxonomic classes, considered as Pet, Use (e.g., used for food, experimentation), or Pest animals. Three hundred and forty-seven participants, aged between 16 and 65 years, completed a questionnaire that measured their belief in the capacity for animals to experience seven primary and secondary emotions. The results showed that attribution of emotions to animals is inconsistent. The ambiguity appears to hinge, in part, upon an animal's functional category and their perceived place in the commonly supposed, though inaccurate, linear hierarchy of species. Nonetheless, the wide range of emotions that were attributed to all species highlights the complex and potentially disorganized thoughts that humans have concerning animals. Belief in animal mind was found to be the strongest and only predictor of emotion attribution to animals in general, but is probably because both are part of the same underlying construct. Ownership of some species—rabbits, horses, rodents and birds—mediated the emotions attributed to that particular species. We conclude that ambiguous attitudes influence the standards of welfare for animals used by humans and that the dichotomous attitudes permit exploitation and welfare violations against animals. Greater understanding of emotion attribution has the potential to improve humane education methods, and suggestions for future research are made.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 6 October 2015
Organisations:
Psychology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 395493
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/395493
ISSN: 0892-7936
PURE UUID: f371b390-a262-4f7f-84e6-5d78b45d6de8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 31 May 2016 11:09
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 00:41
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
A.M. Wilkins
Author:
L.S. McCrae
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics