The politics of incremental change: institutional change in old-age pensions and health care in Germany
The politics of incremental change: institutional change in old-age pensions and health care in Germany
This paper analyzes policy shifts in two core welfare state programs in Germany: old-age pensions and health care. Both programs are prototypes of Bismarckian/ conservative program design (benefits are based on occupational and family status; financing is based on payroll contributions, and administration is based on corporatist arrangements) and both have experienced tremendous cost pressures because of demographic change and rising non-wage labor costs. A series of reforms since the late 1980s has reduced the generosity of benefits and aims to change the governance structures of both programs. Although the reforms include substantial benefit cuts, key conservative principles concerning benefit entitlement and financing remain largely untouched. In both programs, derived rights based on family status remain strong, and occupational fragmentation continues to characterize the overall structure of both systems. The paper argues that this pattern of institutional change is not new, but is typical of the politics of muddling through that has characterized the German system since its inception. I emphasize the impact of German political institutions, the structure of electoral competition, and the legacies of conservative social policy to explain the contemporary pattern of policy development.
113-131
Anderson, Karen M.
219ba2d8-cef1-42f9-8153-19b855784e7d
August 2015
Anderson, Karen M.
219ba2d8-cef1-42f9-8153-19b855784e7d
Anderson, Karen M.
(2015)
The politics of incremental change: institutional change in old-age pensions and health care in Germany.
Journal for Labour Market Research, 48 (2), .
(doi:10.1007/s12651-015-0180-y).
Abstract
This paper analyzes policy shifts in two core welfare state programs in Germany: old-age pensions and health care. Both programs are prototypes of Bismarckian/ conservative program design (benefits are based on occupational and family status; financing is based on payroll contributions, and administration is based on corporatist arrangements) and both have experienced tremendous cost pressures because of demographic change and rising non-wage labor costs. A series of reforms since the late 1980s has reduced the generosity of benefits and aims to change the governance structures of both programs. Although the reforms include substantial benefit cuts, key conservative principles concerning benefit entitlement and financing remain largely untouched. In both programs, derived rights based on family status remain strong, and occupational fragmentation continues to characterize the overall structure of both systems. The paper argues that this pattern of institutional change is not new, but is typical of the politics of muddling through that has characterized the German system since its inception. I emphasize the impact of German political institutions, the structure of electoral competition, and the legacies of conservative social policy to explain the contemporary pattern of policy development.
Text
Anderson JLMR prepub.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 July 2015
Published date: August 2015
Organisations:
Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 395540
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/395540
ISSN: 1614-3485
PURE UUID: 6623ff11-ba35-4743-a7cb-b2348e452ea6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 31 May 2016 15:28
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 00:42
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Karen M. Anderson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics