The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Self-reported walking speed: a useful marker of physical performance among community-dwelling older people?

Self-reported walking speed: a useful marker of physical performance among community-dwelling older people?
Self-reported walking speed: a useful marker of physical performance among community-dwelling older people?
Background: Walking speed is central to emerging consensus definitions of sarcopenia and frailty as well as being a major predictor of future health outcomes in its own right. However, measurement is not always feasible in clinical settings. We hypothesized that self-reported walking speed might be a good marker of objectively measured walking speed for use in this context.

Methods: We investigated the relationship between self-reported and measured walking speed and their associations with clinical characteristics and mortality using data from 730 men and 999 women, aged 61 to 73 years, who participated in the Hertfordshire Cohort Study. Walking speed was measured over 3 meters. Participants rated their walking speed as “unable to walk,” “very slow,” “stroll at an easy pace,” “normal speed,” “fairly brisk,” or “fast.”

Results: Self-reported walking speed was strongly associated with measured walking speed among men and women (P < .001). Average walking speeds ranged from 0.78 m/s (95% CI 0.73–0.83) among men with “very slow” self-reported walking speed to 0.98 m/s (95% CI 0.93–1.03) among “fast” walkers (corresponding figures for women were 0.72 m/s [95% CI 0.68–0.75] and 1.01 m/s [95% CI 0.98–1.05]). Self-reported and measured walking speeds were similarly associated with clinical characteristics and mortality; among men and women, slower self-reported and measured walking speeds were associated (P < .05) with increased likelihood of poor physical function, having more systems medicated and with increased mortality risk, with and without adjustment for sociodemographic and lifestyle factors (hazard ratios for mortality per slower band of self-reported walking speed, adjusted for sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics: men 1.44 [95% CI 1.11–1.87]; women 1.35 [95% CI 1.02–1.81]).

Conclusion and Implications: Self-reported walking speed is a good marker of measured walking speed and could serve as a useful marker of physical performance in consensus definitions of sarcopenia and frailty when direct measurement of walking speed is not feasible.
1525-8610
323-328
Syddall, Holly
a0181a93-8fc3-4998-a996-7963f0128328
Westbury, Leo
5ed45df3-3df7-4bf9-bbad-07b63cd4b281
Cooper, Cyrus
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Aihie Sayer, Avan
fb4c2053-6d51-4fc1-9489-c3cb431b0ffb
Syddall, Holly
a0181a93-8fc3-4998-a996-7963f0128328
Westbury, Leo
5ed45df3-3df7-4bf9-bbad-07b63cd4b281
Cooper, Cyrus
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Aihie Sayer, Avan
fb4c2053-6d51-4fc1-9489-c3cb431b0ffb

Syddall, Holly, Westbury, Leo, Cooper, Cyrus and Aihie Sayer, Avan (2015) Self-reported walking speed: a useful marker of physical performance among community-dwelling older people? Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 16 (4), 323-328. (doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2014.11.004). (PMID:25523286)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Walking speed is central to emerging consensus definitions of sarcopenia and frailty as well as being a major predictor of future health outcomes in its own right. However, measurement is not always feasible in clinical settings. We hypothesized that self-reported walking speed might be a good marker of objectively measured walking speed for use in this context.

Methods: We investigated the relationship between self-reported and measured walking speed and their associations with clinical characteristics and mortality using data from 730 men and 999 women, aged 61 to 73 years, who participated in the Hertfordshire Cohort Study. Walking speed was measured over 3 meters. Participants rated their walking speed as “unable to walk,” “very slow,” “stroll at an easy pace,” “normal speed,” “fairly brisk,” or “fast.”

Results: Self-reported walking speed was strongly associated with measured walking speed among men and women (P < .001). Average walking speeds ranged from 0.78 m/s (95% CI 0.73–0.83) among men with “very slow” self-reported walking speed to 0.98 m/s (95% CI 0.93–1.03) among “fast” walkers (corresponding figures for women were 0.72 m/s [95% CI 0.68–0.75] and 1.01 m/s [95% CI 0.98–1.05]). Self-reported and measured walking speeds were similarly associated with clinical characteristics and mortality; among men and women, slower self-reported and measured walking speeds were associated (P < .05) with increased likelihood of poor physical function, having more systems medicated and with increased mortality risk, with and without adjustment for sociodemographic and lifestyle factors (hazard ratios for mortality per slower band of self-reported walking speed, adjusted for sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics: men 1.44 [95% CI 1.11–1.87]; women 1.35 [95% CI 1.02–1.81]).

Conclusion and Implications: Self-reported walking speed is a good marker of measured walking speed and could serve as a useful marker of physical performance in consensus definitions of sarcopenia and frailty when direct measurement of walking speed is not feasible.

Text
Self-reported walking speed
Download (607kB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 15 December 2014
Published date: 1 April 2015
Organisations: MRC Life-Course Epidemiology Unit

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 396138
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/396138
ISSN: 1525-8610
PURE UUID: 27092045-f887-4816-8aaa-7f3ddf3b9014
ORCID for Holly Syddall: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0171-0306
ORCID for Leo Westbury: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0008-5853-8096
ORCID for Cyrus Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Jun 2016 13:51
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:28

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Holly Syddall ORCID iD
Author: Leo Westbury ORCID iD
Author: Cyrus Cooper ORCID iD
Author: Avan Aihie Sayer

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×