The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Linking to the CEFR: validation using a priori and a posteriori evidence

Linking to the CEFR: validation using a priori and a posteriori evidence
Linking to the CEFR: validation using a priori and a posteriori evidence
Linking tests to international standards, such as the Common European Framework of Reference: learning, teaching, assessment (CEFR, Council of Europe, 2001), is a way of establishing criterion-referenced validity. This chapter reports on how CEFR scales were operationalized in practice in the course of developing the Pearson Test of English Academic. Measures to link the test to the CEFR were studied at different stages of test development. A posteriori statistical evidence was also collected from both field tests and live tests. Field test data were used to establish the extent to which scores from this test can be linked to the CEFR, which involved both a test-taker-centered approach and an item-centered approach.
83-100
Bloomsbury Academic
De Jong, J.
a38636ab-6597-4ddb-98c4-c39395f5a305
Zheng, Y.
abc38a5e-a4ba-460e-92e2-b766d11d2b29
Banerjee, J.
Tsagari, D.
De Jong, J.
a38636ab-6597-4ddb-98c4-c39395f5a305
Zheng, Y.
abc38a5e-a4ba-460e-92e2-b766d11d2b29
Banerjee, J.
Tsagari, D.

De Jong, J. and Zheng, Y. (2016) Linking to the CEFR: validation using a priori and a posteriori evidence. In, Banerjee, J. and Tsagari, D. (eds.) Contemporary Second Language Assessment. (Contemporary Applied Linguistics, 4) London, GB. Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 83-100.

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

Linking tests to international standards, such as the Common European Framework of Reference: learning, teaching, assessment (CEFR, Council of Europe, 2001), is a way of establishing criterion-referenced validity. This chapter reports on how CEFR scales were operationalized in practice in the course of developing the Pearson Test of English Academic. Measures to link the test to the CEFR were studied at different stages of test development. A posteriori statistical evidence was also collected from both field tests and live tests. Field test data were used to establish the extent to which scores from this test can be linked to the CEFR, which involved both a test-taker-centered approach and an item-centered approach.

Text
dejong zheng 2016_Validation- ch04 - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
7b3b131e-22de-4690-b2e6-8495c37f8b7c - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 30 June 2016
Organisations: Modern Languages and Linguistics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 396223
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/396223
PURE UUID: 7b3b131e-22de-4690-b2e6-8495c37f8b7c
ORCID for Y. Zheng: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2574-0358

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Jun 2016 11:22
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:48

Export record

Contributors

Author: J. De Jong
Author: Y. Zheng ORCID iD
Editor: J. Banerjee
Editor: D. Tsagari

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×