The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A longitudinal study of health related quality of life in children treated for cerebellar tumours compared with a non-tumour group

A longitudinal study of health related quality of life in children treated for cerebellar tumours compared with a non-tumour group
A longitudinal study of health related quality of life in children treated for cerebellar tumours compared with a non-tumour group
This thesis investigated health related quality of life (HRQoL) measured annually at three time points (T1, T2, T3) in children treated for medulloblastoma (SRM) or low grade cerebellar astrocytoma (LGCA) compared with a typically developing group of children. Four research questions were addressed. These were, first, whether HRQoL and other aspects of quality of survival differ between children treated for cerebellar tumours and a representative sample of children in the general population. Second, whether there are differences between HRQoL in children treated for SRM and LGCA. Third, whether HRQoL and the factors that impacted on it changed over time. Fourth whether there were any early modifiable predictors of subsequent HRQoL.

Children treated for cerebellar tumours had a significantly poorer HRQoL and IQ than the Comparison group. In addition, those in the SRM group had significantly poorer health status, and behavioural and executive functioning, the latter by teacher-report only.

Children in the SRM group had a significantly poorer HRQoL, health status (by parent-report only), and behavioural functioning (by teacher-report only) than children in the LGCA group. IQ and executive functioning were similar.

Longitudinally, in the SRM group, HRQoL and health status improved but remained very poor. Behaviour and IQ did not improve, and executive functioning declined (by teacher-report only). In the LGCA group HRQoL and IQ did not improve and remained poor. Specific help at school increased in the SRM group from 40% at T1 to 57% at T3. In the LGCA group the percentages were 11 and 24 compared with a consistent 3% in the Comparison group, indicating increasing need for educational support in both tumour groups.

Motor and sensory functioning, emotional functioning (except by parent-report at T3), and cognitive functioning (by child-report at T3 only) were consistent predictors of HRQoL over time. At T1, emotion and cognition (by child-and parent-report), child’s age (by child-report), and motor and sensory functioning (by parent-report) predicted subsequent HRQoL two years later.

These findings show that impairment is evident early on in children treated for cerebellar tumours and persists over time. HRQoL remains poor particularly in the LGCA group where no improvement was observed. These children need to be assessed regularly and monitored as early intervention to mitigate cognitive and emotional difficulties especially in older children, may help to improve subsequent HRQoL. Future research should focus on early interventions.
Bull, Kim
751f8b25-29ba-4d4f-96e2-6c339a83a47f
Bull, Kim
751f8b25-29ba-4d4f-96e2-6c339a83a47f
Kennedy, Colin
7c3aff62-0a86-4b44-b7d7-4bc01f23ec93
Liossi, Christina
fd401ad6-581a-4a31-a60b-f8671ffd3558

Bull, Kim (2012) A longitudinal study of health related quality of life in children treated for cerebellar tumours compared with a non-tumour group. University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, Doctoral Thesis, 224pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

This thesis investigated health related quality of life (HRQoL) measured annually at three time points (T1, T2, T3) in children treated for medulloblastoma (SRM) or low grade cerebellar astrocytoma (LGCA) compared with a typically developing group of children. Four research questions were addressed. These were, first, whether HRQoL and other aspects of quality of survival differ between children treated for cerebellar tumours and a representative sample of children in the general population. Second, whether there are differences between HRQoL in children treated for SRM and LGCA. Third, whether HRQoL and the factors that impacted on it changed over time. Fourth whether there were any early modifiable predictors of subsequent HRQoL.

Children treated for cerebellar tumours had a significantly poorer HRQoL and IQ than the Comparison group. In addition, those in the SRM group had significantly poorer health status, and behavioural and executive functioning, the latter by teacher-report only.

Children in the SRM group had a significantly poorer HRQoL, health status (by parent-report only), and behavioural functioning (by teacher-report only) than children in the LGCA group. IQ and executive functioning were similar.

Longitudinally, in the SRM group, HRQoL and health status improved but remained very poor. Behaviour and IQ did not improve, and executive functioning declined (by teacher-report only). In the LGCA group HRQoL and IQ did not improve and remained poor. Specific help at school increased in the SRM group from 40% at T1 to 57% at T3. In the LGCA group the percentages were 11 and 24 compared with a consistent 3% in the Comparison group, indicating increasing need for educational support in both tumour groups.

Motor and sensory functioning, emotional functioning (except by parent-report at T3), and cognitive functioning (by child-report at T3 only) were consistent predictors of HRQoL over time. At T1, emotion and cognition (by child-and parent-report), child’s age (by child-report), and motor and sensory functioning (by parent-report) predicted subsequent HRQoL two years later.

These findings show that impairment is evident early on in children treated for cerebellar tumours and persists over time. HRQoL remains poor particularly in the LGCA group where no improvement was observed. These children need to be assessed regularly and monitored as early intervention to mitigate cognitive and emotional difficulties especially in older children, may help to improve subsequent HRQoL. Future research should focus on early interventions.

PDF
Kim Bull PhD thesis .pdf - Other
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: November 2012
Organisations: University of Southampton, Clinical & Experimental Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 397080
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/397080
PURE UUID: b1dd6982-6b44-4d6e-8729-29c422cb65a2
ORCID for Kim Bull: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5541-4556

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Jul 2016 15:21
Last modified: 06 Jun 2018 12:54

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×